IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v192y2024ics0167947323001974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burn-in selection in simulating stationary time series

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yuanbo
  • Chan, Chu Kin
  • Yau, Chun Yip
  • Ng, Wai Leong
  • Lam, Henry

Abstract

Many time series models are defined in a recursive manner, which prohibits exact simulations. In practice, one appeals to simulating a long time series and discarding a large number of initial simulated observations, known as the burn-in. For autoregressive models where the dependence decays exponentially fast, the choice of the burn-in is not critical. However, for long-memory time series where the dependence from the remote past is strong, it is not clear how to select the burn-in number. By combining several samplers with randomized burn-in numbers, a method for exactly simulating the expectation of a statistic computed from a time series is developed. Moreover, with some suitably chosen statistics, the exact simulation method can be applied to quantify the effect of burn-in numbers on the simulated sample. Simulation studies are conducted to provide some practical guidances for burn-in selections.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yuanbo & Chan, Chu Kin & Yau, Chun Yip & Ng, Wai Leong & Lam, Henry, 2024. "Burn-in selection in simulating stationary time series," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0167947323001974
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2023.107886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947323001974
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2023.107886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0167947323001974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.