IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v57y2025i3s0890838924002774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female lead auditors, audit fees, and audit quality

Author

Listed:
  • Jérôme, Tiphaine
  • Poretti, Cédric
  • Schatt, Alain

Abstract

We investigate whether female lead auditors are associated with higher audit fees and audit quality. We expect female lead auditors to have a significant influence on these audit outcomes for two reasons. First, female auditors are more risk averse and less tolerant of opportunistic behaviours than their male counterparts. Second, lead auditors perform more numerous and varied tasks and spend more time on the audit of a given client than concurring auditors. Our results show that female lead auditors are associated with higher audit quality but not with higher audit fees. However, these results only hold for female lead auditors with low client-specific experience (i.e., in a riskier context). Finally, additional analyses suggest that female lead auditors and female concurring auditors have a different influence on audit fees and audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérôme, Tiphaine & Poretti, Cédric & Schatt, Alain, 2025. "Female lead auditors, audit fees, and audit quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:57:y:2025:i:3:s0890838924002774
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924002774
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jere R. Francis & Paul N. Michas & Scott E. Seavey, 2013. "Does Audit Market Concentration Harm the Quality of Audited Earnings? Evidence from Audit Markets in 42 Countries," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 325-355, March.
    2. Costa, Mabel D. & Habib, Ahsan, 2023. "Local creative culture and audit fees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    3. Jeff L. McMullin & Bryce Schonberger, 2020. "Entropy-balanced accruals," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 84-119, March.
    4. Hainmueller, Jens, 2012. "Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 25-46, January.
    5. repec:eme:maj000:02686901111171448 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. De George, Emmanuel T. & Li, Xi & Shivakumar, Lakshmanan, 2016. "A review of the IFRS adoption literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67599, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Kausar, Asad & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2016. "Real effects of the audit choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 157-181.
    8. Downar, Benedikt & Ernstberger, Jürgen & Koch, Christopher, 2021. "Who makes partner in Big 4 audit firms? – Evidence from Germany," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Jones, Jj, 1991. "Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 193-228.
    10. Kris Hardies & Diane Breesch & Joël Branson, 2016. "Do (Fe)Male Auditors Impair Audit Quality? Evidence from Going-Concern Opinions," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 7-34, May.
    11. Jyrki Niskanen & Jukka Karjalainen & Mervi Niskanen & Jussi Karjalainen, 2011. "Auditor gender and corporate earnings management behavior in private Finnish firms," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(9), pages 778-793, October.
    12. Jong†Hag Choi & Jeong†Bon Kim & Xiaohong Liu & Dan A. Simunic, 2008. "Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory and Cross†country Evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 55-99, March.
    13. Dou, Yiwei & Khan, Mozaffar & Zou, Youli, 2016. "Labor unemployment insurance and earnings management," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 166-184.
    14. Agoglia, Christopher P. & Hatfield, Richard C. & Lambert, Tamara A., 2015. "Audit team time reporting: An agency theory perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Husam Aldamen & Janice Hollindale & Jennifer L. Ziegelmayer, 2018. "Female audit committee members and their influence on audit fees," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(1), pages 57-89, March.
    16. Richard A. Bernardi & Donald F. Arnold, 1997. "An Examination of Moral Development within Public Accounting by Gender, Staff Level, and Firm," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 653-668, December.
    17. Jyrki Niskanen & Jukka Karjalainen & Mervi Niskanen & Jussi Karjalainen, 2011. "Auditor gender and corporate earnings management behavior in private Finnish firms," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(9), pages 778-793, October.
    18. David C. Hay & W. Robert Knechel & Norman Wong, 2006. "Audit Fees: A Meta†analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 141-191, March.
    19. C. S. Agnes Cheng & Kun Wang & Yanping Xu & Ning Zhang, 2020. "The impact of revealing auditor partner quality: evidence from a long panel," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1475-1506, December.
    20. David Windisch, 2021. "Enforcement, Managerial Discretion, and the Informativeness of Accruals," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 705-732, August.
    21. Rachel Croson & Uri Gneezy, 2009. "Gender Differences in Preferences," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 448-474, June.
    22. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri, 2012. "Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 50-58.
    23. Radwan Hussien Alkebsee & Gao-Liang Tian & Muhammad Usman & Muhammad Abubakkar Siddique & Adeeb A. Alhebry, 2021. "Gender diversity in audit committees and audit fees: evidence from China," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 72-104, March.
    24. Xavier Giroud, 2013. "Proximity and Investment: Evidence from Plant-Level Data," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(2), pages 861-915.
    25. Kevin Koh & Li Li & Xuejiao Liu & Chunfei Wang, 2023. "The Effect of Audit Partner Diversity on Audit Quality: Evidence from China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(1), pages 340-380, March.
    26. repec:hal:journl:hal-02312196 is not listed on IDEAS
    27. Wei Chen & Paul Hribar & Samuel Melessa, 2018. "Incorrect Inferences When Using Residuals as Dependent Variables," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 751-796, June.
    28. Downar, Benedikt & Ernstberger, Jürgen & Koch, Christopher, 2021. "Determinants and consequences of auditor dyad formation at the top level of audit teams," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    29. repec:eme:maj000:maj-12-2018-2121 is not listed on IDEAS
    30. repec:eme:maj000:maj-06-2019-2326 is not listed on IDEAS
    31. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Tawhid Chtioui, 2018. "Gender-diverse audit partners and audit fee premium: The case of mandatory joint audit," Post-Print hal-02380486, HAL.
    32. Kothari, S.P. & Leone, Andrew J. & Wasley, Charles E., 2005. "Performance matched discretionary accrual measures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 163-197, February.
    33. Paul André & GéRaldine Broye & Christopher Pong & Alain Schatt, 2016. "Are Joint Audits Associated with Higher Audit Fees?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 245-274, June.
    34. Francis, Jere R., 2023. "Going big, going small: A perspective on strategies for researching audit quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    35. Yosra Mnif Sellami & Imen Cherif, 2020. "Female audit committee directorship and audit fees," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 398-428, January.
    36. Mara Cameran & Angelo Ditillo & Angela Pettinicchio, 2018. "Audit Team Attributes Matter: How Diversity Affects Audit Quality," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 595-621, August.
    37. Alhababsah, Salem & Alhaj-Ismail, Alaa, 2023. "Does shared tenure between audit committee chair and engagement partner affect audit outcomes? Evidence from the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    38. Karen M. Y. Lai & Bin Srinidhi & Ferdinand A. Gul & Judy S. L. Tsui, 2017. "Board Gender Diversity, Auditor Fees, and Auditor Choice," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 1681-1714, September.
    39. Chen, Huimin (Amy) & Francis, Bill B. & Shen, Yinjie (Victor) & Wu, Qiang, 2024. "The impact of hedge fund activism on audit pricing," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    40. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    41. Emmanuel T. De George & Xi Li & Lakshmanan Shivakumar, 2016. "A review of the IFRS adoption literature," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 898-1004, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    2. Garcia-Blandon, Josep & Argilés-Bosch, Josep Maria & Ravenda, Diego, 2019. "Is there a gender effect on the quality of audit services?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 238-249.
    3. Godsell, David & Huang, Kelly & Lao, Brent, 2023. "Managers’ rank & file employee coordination costs and real activities manipulation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Krishnan, Gopal V. & Singer, Zvi & Zhang, Jing, 2023. "Audit partner ethnicity and salient audit phenomena," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Andrews Owusu & Alaa Mansour Zalata & Kamil Omoteso & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Is There a Trade-Off Between Accrual-Based and Real Earnings Management Activities in the Presence of (fe) Male Auditors?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 815-836, February.
    6. Badertscher, Brad A. & Kim, Jaewoo & Kinney, William R. & Owens, Edward, 2023. "Assurance level choice, CPA fees, and financial reporting benefits: Inferences from U.S. private firms," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2).
    7. Marcel Haak & Michelle Muraz & Roland Zieseniß, 2018. "Joint Audits: Does the Allocation of Audit Work Affect Audit Quality and Audit Fees?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 55-80, January.
    8. Pan, Yue & Shroff, Nemit & Zhang, Pengdong, 2023. "The dark side of audit market competition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    9. Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni Mohd & Basioudis, Ilias G & Farooque, Omar Al, 2021. "Effects of the Big 4 national and city-level industry expertise on audit quality in the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    10. Wen, Fenghua & Chen, Meng & Zhang, Yun & Miao, Xiao, 2023. "Oil price uncertainty and audit fees: Evidence from the energy industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Masoud Azizkhani & Sarowar Hossain & Mai Nguyen, 2023. "Effects of audit committee chair characteristics on auditor choice, audit fee and audit quality," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3675-3707, September.
    12. Fangfang Hou, 2025. "Foreign capital exposure and firms’ financial reporting behavior: international evidence from equity market openings," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 621-662, February.
    13. Owusu, Andrews & Zalata, Alaa Mansour, 2023. "Credit rating agency response to appointment of female audit partners: Evidence from the UK," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    14. Bona-Sánchez, Carolina & Fleitas-Castillo, Gema C. & Pérez-Alemán, Jerónimo & Santana-Martín, Domingo J., 2024. "Gender diversity and audit fees: Insights from a principal-principal agency conflict setting," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    15. Andreea Georgiana PASCARU & Camelia-Daniela HATEGAN, 2024. "Audit Quality and Audit Market at European Level," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 22(176), pages 758-768, October.
    16. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati & Riadh Manita, 2023. "Homophily versus monitoring : Do all female board directors drive the gender assignment of audit partners?," Post-Print hal-04325648, HAL.
    17. Inder K. Khurana & Nathan G. Lundstrom & K. K. Raman, 2021. "PCAOB Inspections and the Differential Audit Quality Effect for Big 4 and Non–Big 4 US Auditors," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 376-411, March.
    18. Liwei Shan & Albert Tsang & Xiaoxue Zhang, 2024. "Transporting Audit Quality Across Countries: Returnee CEOs and Audit Fees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(4), pages 845-874, July.
    19. Ammar Ali Gull & Ammar Abid & Rashid Latief & Muhammad Usman, 2021. "Women on board and auditors’ assessment of the risk of material misstatement," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 679-708, December.
    20. Tarek Abdelfattah & Mohamed Elmahgoub & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2021. "Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 177-197, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:57:y:2025:i:3:s0890838924002774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.