IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v45y2013i1p58-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

UK charity accounting: An exercise in widening stakeholder engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Connolly, Ciaran
  • Hyndman, Noel
  • McConville, Danielle

Abstract

Given the economic and social impact of the charity sector in the United Kingdom (UK), the importance of good governance has been recognised as a basis for underpinning effective and efficient performance, and for ensuring that charities meet the legitimate aspirations of key stakeholders. A major aspect of this is high-quality accounting and reporting. Over the past 25 years attempts have been made to improve this through the medium of successive, evolving versions of a Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) for charities. As a foundation for the future review of the SORP (expected to be published in 2015), the SORP Committee undertook its largest ever consultation on an accounting pronouncement. This paper presents the findings of that consultation and, analysing them using stakeholder theory, concludes that this ambitious exercise facilitated much wider stakeholder engagement than had been experienced before and has the potential to legitimise further the SORP.

Suggested Citation

  • Connolly, Ciaran & Hyndman, Noel & McConville, Danielle, 2013. "UK charity accounting: An exercise in widening stakeholder engagement," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 58-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:45:y:2013:i:1:p:58-69
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2012.12.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838912000820
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2012.12.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grant Samkin & Annika Schneider, 2010. "Accountability, narrative reporting and legitimation," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(2), pages 256-289, February.
    2. Lore Wellens & Marc Jegers, 2011. "Beneficiaries' participation in nonprofit organizations: a theory-based approach," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 175-182, May.
    3. Roberts, John, 1991. "The possibilities of accountability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 355-368.
    4. Gareth G. Morgan, 2011. "The role of independent examiners in the accountability of UK charities," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 183-192, May.
    5. Hyndman, Noel & McMahon, Danielle, 2010. "The evolution of the UK charity Statement of Recommended Practice: The influence of key stakeholders," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 455-466, December.
    6. Kreander, Niklas & Beattie, Vivien & McPhail, Ken, 2009. "Putting our money where their mouth is: Alignment of charitable aims with charity investments – Tensions in policy and practice," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 154-168.
    7. Andrew Hind, 2011. "New development: Increasing public trust and confidence in charities: on the side of the angels," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 201-205, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Moggi & Gina Rossi & Chiara Leardini, 2019. "How to be accountable to local stakeholders: A lesson from savings banks," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 35-67.
    2. Vien Chu & Belinda Luke, 2021. "Understanding success in micro‐enterprise development: Dimensions and misconceptions," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 63-78, May.
    3. Ramesh Nair & Roshayani Arshad & Ruhaini Muda & Siti Aeisha Joharry, 2023. "Web-disclosure practices for transparency and the sustainability of non-profit organisations," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Elka Johansson & Peter Carey & George Tanewski & Iliyas Yusoff, 2022. "The effect of members on charities’ annual reporting: evidence from companies limited by guarantee in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1851-1886, April.
    5. Yasmin, Sofia & Ghafran, Chaudhry & Haslam, Jim, 2021. "Centre-staging beneficiaries in charity accountability: Insights from an Islamic post-secular perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Alexander, Anna & Pilonato, Silvia & Redigolo, Giulia, 2023. "Do institutional donors value social media activity and engagement? Empirical evidence on Italian non-profit grantees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    7. Kingston, Kylie L. & Luke, Belinda & Furneaux, Craig & Alderman, Lyn, 2023. "Examining the re-territorialisation of beneficiary accountability: Digitising nonprofit services in response to COVID-19," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    8. Janet Mack & Gareth G. Morgan & Oonagh B. Breen & Carolyn J. Cordery, 2017. "Financial reporting by charities: a matched case study analysis from four countries," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 165-172, April.
    9. Henderson, Elisa & Lambert, Vicky, 2018. "Negotiating for survival: Balancing mission and money," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 185-198.
    10. Sheila Ellwood & Javier Garcia-Lacalle, 2015. "The Influence of Presence and Position of Women on the Boards of Directors: The Case of NHS Foundation Trusts," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 69-84, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karunakaran, Arvind & Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2022. "Crowd-based accountability: examining how social media commentary reconfigures organizational accountability," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114401, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Vassili Joannides & N. Berland, 2008. "Grounded theory: quels usages dans les recherches en contrôle de gestion?," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00676580, HAL.
    3. Wasswa Asaph Senoga, 2023. "The Effect of Accountability, Transparency, And Integrity of Church Leaders on Fraud Prevention in The Management of Church Funds," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(1), pages 1388-1409, January.
    4. Roberts, John, 2021. "The boundary of the ‘economic’: Financial accounting, corporate ‘imaginaries’ and human sentience," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Johansen, Thomas Riise, 2008. "‘Blaming oneself’: Examining the dual accountability role of employees," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 544-571.
    6. Lai Ken Tan & Matthew Egan, 2018. "The Public Accountability Value of a Triple Bottom Line Approach to Performance Reporting in the Water Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(2), pages 235-250, June.
    7. Vassili Joannides, 2012. "Accounterability and the problematics of accountability," Post-Print hal-00676561, HAL.
    8. Sofia Yasmin & Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2014. "Communicated Accountability by Faith-Based Charity Organisations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 103-123, June.
    9. Young, Joni J., 1996. "Institutional thinking: The case of financial instruments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 487-512, July.
    10. Hasan, Rashedul & Siraj, Siti Alawiah, 2017. "Toward Developing a Model of Stakeholder Trust in Waqf Institutions," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 25, pages 85-109.
    11. Irvine, Helen & Moerman, Lee, 2017. "Gambling with the public sphere: Accounting’s contribution to debate on social issues," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 35-52.
    12. Ahrens, Thomas & Mollona, Massimiliano, 2007. "Organisational control as cultural practice--A shop floor ethnography of a Sheffield steel mill," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 305-331.
    13. Vassili Joannides & N. Berland, 2008. "Grounded theory: quels usages dans les recherches en contrôle de gestion?," Post-Print hal-00676580, HAL.
    14. Lai, Alessandro & Leoni, Giulia & Stacchezzini, Riccardo, 2014. "The socializing effects of accounting in flood recovery," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 579-603.
    15. Cooper, Stuart M. & Owen, David L., 2007. "Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 649-667.
    16. Aresu, Simone & Monfardini, Patrizio, 2023. "Oppressed by consumerism: The emancipatory role of household accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Martinez, Daniel E. & Cooper, David J., 2017. "Assembling international development: Accountability and the disarticulation of a social movement," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 6-20.
    18. Oakes, Leslie S. & Young, Joni J., 2010. "Reconciling conflict: The role of accounting in the American Indian Trust Fund debacle," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 63-75.
    19. Cooper, Christine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2021. "Hillsborough: The fight for accountability," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Muhammad Wahyuddin Abdullah & Fetti Fatimah Yusuf & Andi Yustika Manrimawagau Bayan, 2020. "The Sustainability Governance: Reciprocation Accountability based Emotional Quotient," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 7(1), pages 183-200, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:45:y:2013:i:1:p:58-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.