IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v328y2022ics0306261922014027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of solid oxide steam-electrolysis cell systems: Thermodynamics and thermal integration

Author

Listed:
  • Min, Gyubin
  • Choi, Saeyoung
  • Hong, Jongsup

Abstract

As the world is advancing towards a hydrogen society, solid oxide electrolysis cell systems are gaining increasing attention owing to their overwhelming thermodynamic advantages. Solid oxide electrolysis cell systems operate at high temperatures; therefore, they can achieve a substantially high energy conversion efficiency, which is critical in determining the techno-economic feasibility of green hydrogen production. However, one key concern to be resolved prior to market deployment is maintaining high operating temperatures. In this study, the thermal aspects of currently verified solid oxide electrolysis cell systems are reviewed based on standardized criteria. First, the basic concept of the thermal integration of solid oxide electrolysis cell systems is introduced. Second, standardized thermodynamic indices are introduced to enable consistent performance evaluation and capture thermal characteristics from a system-level perspective. Particularly, this review presents complete information on the system efficiency, specific energy consumption, specific thermal energy consumption, and system thermoneutral voltages. Third, based on the aforementioned discussion, the recently verified solid oxide electrolysis cell systems are reviewed, focusing on their thermal aspects. The analysis on ten verified SOEC systems from different institutions suggest that system thermal integration and operating conditions must be designed considering external thermal energy consumption. Furthermore, several future milestones in solid oxide electrolysis cell system verification are discussed. Currently, five institutions are developing kilowatts to megawatt scale SOEC systems and most of them are considering ironworks and nuclear power plants as external heat sources. This review is expected to shed light on the hitherto overlooked thermal aspect of solid oxide electrolysis cell systems and suggest a future direction for system design and demonstration.

Suggested Citation

  • Min, Gyubin & Choi, Saeyoung & Hong, Jongsup, 2022. "A review of solid oxide steam-electrolysis cell systems: Thermodynamics and thermal integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:328:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922014027
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922014027
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Ligang & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Madi, Hossein & Diethelm, Stefan & herle, Jan Van & Maréchal, François, 2018. "Optimal design of solid-oxide electrolyzer based power-to-methane systems: A comprehensive comparison between steam electrolysis and co-electrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1060-1079.
    2. Penner, S.S., 2006. "Steps toward the hydrogen economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 33-43.
    3. Stempien, Jan Pawel & Ni, Meng & Sun, Qiang & Chan, Siew Hwa, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis of combined Solid Oxide Electrolyzer and Fischer–Tropsch processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 682-690.
    4. Karamarkovic, Rade & Karamarkovic, Vladan, 2010. "Energy and exergy analysis of biomass gasification at different temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 537-549.
    5. Hepbasli, Arif & Ozgener, Leyla, 2004. "Development of geothermal energy utilization in Turkey: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 433-460, October.
    6. Yue, Meiling & Lambert, Hugo & Pahon, Elodie & Roche, Robin & Jemei, Samir & Hissel, Daniel, 2021. "Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Hong, Jongsup & Chaudhry, Gunaranjan & Brisson, J.G. & Field, Randall & Gazzino, Marco & Ghoniem, Ahmed F., 2009. "Analysis of oxy-fuel combustion power cycle utilizing a pressurized coal combustor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1332-1340.
    8. Sun, Yi & Hu, Xiongfeng & Gao, Jun & Han, Yu & Sun, Anwei & Zheng, Nan & Shuai, Wei & Xiao, Gang & Guo, Meiting & Ni, Meng & Xu, Haoran, 2022. "Solid oxide electrolysis cell under real fluctuating power supply with a focus on thermal stress analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    9. Srikanth, S. & Heddrich, M.P. & Gupta, S. & Friedrich, K.A., 2018. "Transient reversible solid oxide cell reactor operation – Experimentally validated modeling and analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 473-488.
    10. Sonja Renssen, 2020. "The hydrogen solution?," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(9), pages 799-801, September.
    11. Jeanmonod, Guillaume & Wang, Ligang & Diethelm, Stefan & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan, 2019. "Trade-off designs of power-to-methane systems via solid-oxide electrolyzer and the application to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 572-581.
    12. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    13. Buttler, Alexander & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2018. "Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2440-2454.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan Shao & Yongwei Li & Zaiguo Fu & Jingfa Li & Qunzhi Zhu, 2023. "Numerical Investigation on the Performance of IT-SOEC with Double-Layer Composite Electrode," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Youchan Kim & Kisung Lim & Hassan Salihi & Seongku Heo & Hyunchul Ju, 2023. "The Effects of Stack Configurations on the Thermal Management Capabilities of Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Jesús Rey & Francisca Segura & José Manuel Andújar, 2023. "Green Hydrogen: Resources Consumption, Technological Maturity, and Regulatory Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Xia, Zhiping & Zhao, Dongqi & Li, Yuanzheng & Deng, Zhonghua & Kupecki, Jakub & Fu, Xiaowei & Li, Xi, 2023. "Control-oriented dynamic process optimization of solid oxide electrolysis cell system with the gas characteristic regarding oxygen electrode delamination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reznicek, Evan P. & Braun, Robert J., 2020. "Reversible solid oxide cell systems for integration with natural gas pipeline and carbon capture infrastructure for grid energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Socio-technical barriers to domestic hydrogen futures: Repurposing pipelines, policies, and public perceptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Yueshi Wu & Weihong Yang & Wlodzimierz Blasiak, 2014. "Energy and Exergy Analysis of High Temperature Agent Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    5. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of biomass-to-methanol with solid-oxide electrolyzer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    7. del Pozo Gonzalez, Hector & Bernadet, Lucile & Torrell, Marc & Bianchi, Fernando D. & Tarancón, Albert & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Dominguez-Garcia, Jose Luis, 2023. "Power transition cycles of reversible solid oxide cells and its impacts on microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    8. Shaojie Song & Haiyang Lin & Peter Sherman & Xi Yang & Chris P. Nielsen & Xinyu Chen & Michael B. McElroy, 2021. "Production of hydrogen from offshore wind in China and cost-competitive supply to Japan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Sun, Yi & Qian, Tang & Zhu, Jingdong & Zheng, Nan & Han, Yu & Xiao, Gang & Ni, Meng & Xu, Haoran, 2023. "Dynamic simulation of a reversible solid oxide cell system for efficient H2 production and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    10. Ahmad Baroutaji & Arun Arjunan & John Robinson & Tabbi Wilberforce & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Abdul Ghani Olabi, 2021. "PEMFC Poly-Generation Systems: Developments, Merits, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    11. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    12. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    13. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    14. Son, Yeong Geon & Choi, Sungyun & Aquah, Moses Amoasi & Kim, Sung Yul, 2023. "Systematic planning of power-to-gas for improving photovoltaic acceptance rate: Application of the potential RES penetration index," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    15. Safarian, Sahar & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "The equivalence of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric methods for modeling gasification and other reaction equilibria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Blanco, Herib & Leaver, Jonathan & Dodds, Paul E. & Dickinson, Robert & García-Gusano, Diego & Iribarren, Diego & Lind, Arne & Wang, Changlong & Danebergs, Janis & Baumann, Martin, 2022. "A taxonomy of models for investigating hydrogen energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Wang, Ligang & Rao, Megha & Diethelm, Stefan & Lin, Tzu-En & Zhang, Hanfei & Hagen, Anke & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan, 2019. "Power-to-methane via co-electrolysis of H2O and CO2: The effects of pressurized operation and internal methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1432-1445.
    18. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Landon, Robert Stephen & Kim, Jeongdong & Liu, Yi & Moon, Il, 2022. "Continuous and flexible Renewable-Power-to-Methane via liquid CO2 energy storage: Revisiting the techno-economic potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Gábor Pörzse & Zoltán Csedő & Máté Zavarkó, 2021. "Disruption Potential Assessment of the Power-to-Methane Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Wehrle, Lukas & Schmider, Daniel & Dailly, Julian & Banerjee, Aayan & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2022. "Benchmarking solid oxide electrolysis cell-stacks for industrial Power-to-Methane systems via hierarchical multi-scale modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:328:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922014027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.