IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v310y2022ics0306261922000927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nearly-zero carbon optimal operation model and benefit allocation strategy for a novel virtual power plant using carbon capture, power-to-gas, and waste incineration power in rural areas

Author

Listed:
  • Ju, Liwei
  • Yin, Zhe
  • Zhou, Qingqing
  • Li, Qiaochu
  • Wang, Peng
  • Tian, Wenxu
  • Li, Peng
  • Tan, Zhongfu

Abstract

Aiming at utilizing a large number of distributed energy sources in rural areas such as straw and garbage biomass, rooftop photovoltaics, and decentralized wind power, this study designed a novel structure of a virtual power plant connected with gas-power plant carbon capture (GPPCC), power-to-gas (P2G), and waste incineration power (WI), namely, a GPW-VPP. Then, the information gap decision theory (IGDT) and fuzzy satisfaction method were applied to construct a nearly-zero carbon optimal operation model. In this model, the maximum revenue and minimum carbon emissions were selected as the initial objectives, which were converted into one maximum satisfaction objective. Three uncertainty variables, namely, wind power, photovoltaic power, and user’s load, were described using the IGDT. Secondly, to optimize the distribution of the cooperative operation revenue for the entities in GPW-VPP, a Nash negotiation-based benefit allocation strategy is established considering the multidimensional contribution factors of risks, benefits, and carbon emissions. Finally, the Lankao Rural Energy Revolution Pilot program in China was selected as the case study, the results showed: (1) GPW-VPP can aggregate and utilize different types of distributed energy sources such as rural wind power plants (WPPs) and photovoltaic power generation (PVs) to realize the electricity–carbon–electricity cycle effect. (2) The proposed operation optimization model can measure the uncertainty risk and formulate an optimal plan considering the above dual objectives. When the deviation coefficient of the predicted objectives is 0.5, the uncertainty degree is 0.142, and the cost of the decision plan is less than the expected cost of decision maker. Compared with the maximum revenue objective, the operation revenue and carbon emissions reduced by 4.6% and 35.76% under the comprehensive optimization objective, respectively, (3) The proposed benefit distribution strategy can be used to formulate a better benefit distribution plan that meets the comprehensive contributions of multiple entities. Affected by the risk of output uncertainty, the benefit proportion of WPP and PV increased, but it was 1.64% lower than that in the traditional distribution plan. Affected by carbon emissions, the benefit proportion of biomass power generation decreased, but it was 0.57% higher than that in the traditional distribution plan. Overall, the proposed operation optimization model and benefit distribution strategy can balance the interest requirements of different entities and promote the optimal aggregation and utilization of rural distributed energy resources, which is conducive to the realization of a clean and low-carbon transformation of the overall energy structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Ju, Liwei & Yin, Zhe & Zhou, Qingqing & Li, Qiaochu & Wang, Peng & Tian, Wenxu & Li, Peng & Tan, Zhongfu, 2022. "Nearly-zero carbon optimal operation model and benefit allocation strategy for a novel virtual power plant using carbon capture, power-to-gas, and waste incineration power in rural areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:310:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922000927
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922000927
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Qing & Wang, Hao & Wang, Taotao & Zhang, Shengli & Wu, Xiaoxiao & Wang, Hui, 2021. "Blockchain-based decentralized energy management platform for residential distributed energy resources in a virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    2. Tajeddini, Mohammad Amin & Rahimi-Kian, Ashkan & Soroudi, Alireza, 2014. "Risk averse optimal operation of a virtual power plant using two stage stochastic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 958-967.
    3. Nosratabadi, Seyyed Mostafa & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Gholipour, Eskandar, 2016. "Stochastic profit-based scheduling of industrial virtual power plant using the best demand response strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 590-606.
    4. Wang, Shubin & Sun, Shaolong & Zhao, Erlong & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "Urban and rural differences with regional assessment of household energy consumption in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Zhou, Huan & Fan, Shuai & Wu, Qing & Dong, Lianxin & Li, Zuyi & He, Guangyu, 2021. "Stimulus-response control strategy based on autonomous decentralized system theory for exploitation of flexibility by virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Tan, Zhongfu & Wang, Guan & Ju, Liwei & Tan, Qingkun & Yang, Wenhai, 2017. "Application of CVaR risk aversion approach in the dynamical scheduling optimization model for virtual power plant connected with wind-photovoltaic-energy storage system with uncertainties and demand r," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 198-213.
    7. Ju, Liwei & Zhao, Rui & Tan, Qinliang & Lu, Yan & Tan, Qingkun & Wang, Wei, 2019. "A multi-objective robust scheduling model and solution algorithm for a novel virtual power plant connected with power-to-gas and gas storage tank considering uncertainty and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1336-1355.
    8. Kong, Xiangyu & Xiao, Jie & Liu, Dehong & Wu, Jianzhong & Wang, Chengshan & Shen, Yu, 2020. "Robust stochastic optimal dispatching method of multi-energy virtual power plant considering multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Shenbo Yang & Zhongfu Tan & Liwei Ju & Hongyu Lin & Gejirifu De & Qingkun Tan & Feng’ao Zhou, 2018. "An Income Distributing Optimization Model for Cooperative Operation among Different Types of Power Sellers Considering Different Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Bassano, Claudia & Deiana, Paolo & Vilardi, Giorgio & Verdone, Nicola, 2020. "Modeling and economic evaluation of carbon capture and storage technologies integrated into synthetic natural gas and power-to-gas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    11. Liu, Jing & Huang, Fubin & Wang, Zihan & Shuai, Chuanmin, 2021. "What is the anti-poverty effect of solar PV poverty alleviation projects? Evidence from rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Sui, Quan & Wei, Fanrong & Zhang, Rui & Lin, Xiangning & Tong, Ning & Wang, Zhixun & Li, Zhengtian, 2019. "Optimal use of electric energy oriented water-electricity combined supply system for the building-integrated-photovoltaics community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 549-558.
    13. Wei, Congying & Xu, Jian & Liao, Siyang & Sun, Yuanzhang & Jiang, Yibo & Ke, Deping & Zhang, Zhen & Wang, Jing, 2018. "A bi-level scheduling model for virtual power plants with aggregated thermostatically controlled loads and renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 659-670.
    14. Majidi, M. & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. & Soroudi, A., 2019. "Application of information gap decision theory in practical energy problems: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 157-165.
    15. Ju, Liwei & Tan, Zhongfu & Yuan, Jinyun & Tan, Qingkun & Li, Huanhuan & Dong, Fugui, 2016. "A bi-level stochastic scheduling optimization model for a virtual power plant connected to a wind–photovoltaic–energy storage system considering the uncertainty and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 184-199.
    16. Aien, Morteza & Hajebrahimi, Ali & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud, 2016. "A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1077-1089.
    17. Chen, Yang & Park, Byungkwon & Kou, Xiao & Hu, Mengqi & Dong, Jin & Li, Fangxing & Amasyali, Kadir & Olama, Mohammed, 2020. "A comparison study on trading behavior and profit distribution in local energy transaction games," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    18. Yu, Songyuan & Fang, Fang & Liu, Yajuan & Liu, Jizhen, 2019. "Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 454-470.
    19. Shen, Jianjian & Cheng, Chuntian & Zhang, Xiufei & Zhou, Binbin, 2018. "Coordinated operations of multiple-reservoir cascaded hydropower plants with cooperation benefit allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 509-518.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Xusheng & Lou, Suhua & Chen, Zhe & Wu, Yaowu, 2022. "Flexible operation of integrated energy system with HVDC infeed considering multi-retrofitted combined heat and power units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    2. Mostafa Darvishi & Mehrdad Tahmasebi & Ehsan Shokouhmand & Jagadeesh Pasupuleti & Pitshou Bokoro & Jwan Satei Raafat, 2023. "Optimal Operation of Sustainable Virtual Power Plant Considering the Amount of Emission in the Presence of Renewable Energy Sources and Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Wu, Qunli & Li, Chunxiang, 2023. "Modeling and operation optimization of hydrogen-based integrated energy system with refined power-to-gas and carbon-capture-storage technologies under carbon trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Mohammad Mohammadi Roozbehani & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Saeed Hasanzadeh & Seifeddine Ben Elghali, 2022. "Virtual Power Plant Operational Strategies: Models, Markets, Optimization, Challenges, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Elisabetta Allevi & Maria Elena Giuli & Ruth Domínguez & Giorgia Oggioni, 2023. "Evaluating the role of waste-to-energy and cogeneration units in district heatings and electricity markets," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-49, December.
    6. Ye, Jianan & Xie, Min & Zhang, Shiping & Huang, Ying & Liu, Mingbo & Wang, Qiong, 2023. "Stochastic optimal scheduling of electricity–hydrogen enriched compressed natural gas urban integrated energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1024-1044.
    7. Zhang, Bin & Wu, Xuewei & Ghias, Amer M.Y.M. & Chen, Zhe, 2023. "Coordinated carbon capture systems and power-to-gas dynamic economic energy dispatch strategy for electricity–gas coupled systems considering system uncertainty: An improved soft actor–critic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    8. Xu, Jiazhu & Yi, Yuqin, 2023. "Multi-microgrid low-carbon economy operation strategy considering both source and load uncertainty: A Nash bargaining approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    9. Ju, Liwei & Lu, Xiaolong & Yang, Shenbo & Li, Gen & Fan, Wei & Pan, Yushu & Qiao, Huiting, 2022. "A multi-time scale dispatching optimal model for rural biomass waste energy conversion system-based micro-energy grid considering multi-energy demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    10. Zhiming Lu & Youting Li & Guying Zhuo & Chuanbo Xu, 2023. "Configuration Optimization of Hydrogen-Based Multi-Microgrid Systems under Electricity Market Trading and Different Hydrogen Production Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Ju, Liwei & Yin, Zhe & Lu, Xiaolong & Yang, Shenbo & Li, Peng & Rao, Rao & Tan, Zhongfu, 2022. "A Tri-dimensional Equilibrium-based stochastic optimal dispatching model for a novel virtual power plant incorporating carbon Capture, Power-to-Gas and electric vehicle aggregator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    12. Zhang, Junxia & Li, Xingmei & Jia, Dongqing & Zhou, Yuexin, 2023. "A Bi-level programming for union battery swapping stations location-routing problem under joint distribution and cost allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. Li, Jiamei & Ai, Qian & Chen, Minyu, 2023. "Strategic behavior modeling and energy management for electric-thermal-carbon-natural gas integrated energy system considering ancillary service," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naval, Natalia & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "Virtual power plant models and electricity markets - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Yu, Songyuan & Fang, Fang & Liu, Yajuan & Liu, Jizhen, 2019. "Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 454-470.
    3. Mohammad Mohammadi Roozbehani & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Saeed Hasanzadeh & Seifeddine Ben Elghali, 2022. "Virtual Power Plant Operational Strategies: Models, Markets, Optimization, Challenges, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Amit Kumer Podder & Sayemul Islam & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Pulivarthi Nageswara Rao & Kushal A. Prasad & T. Logeswaran & Kabir A. Mamun, 2020. "Systematic Categorization of Optimization Strategies for Virtual Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-46, November.
    5. Ju, Liwei & Yin, Zhe & Lu, Xiaolong & Yang, Shenbo & Li, Peng & Rao, Rao & Tan, Zhongfu, 2022. "A Tri-dimensional Equilibrium-based stochastic optimal dispatching model for a novel virtual power plant incorporating carbon Capture, Power-to-Gas and electric vehicle aggregator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    6. Mohseni, Soheil & Brent, Alan C. & Kelly, Scott & Browne, Will N., 2022. "Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Kong, Xiangyu & Xiao, Jie & Wang, Chengshan & Cui, Kai & Jin, Qiang & Kong, Deqian, 2019. "Bi-level multi-time scale scheduling method based on bidding for multi-operator virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 178-189.
    8. Wafa Nafkha-Tayari & Seifeddine Ben Elghali & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Mohamed Benbouzid, 2022. "Virtual Power Plants Optimization Issue: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Solutions, and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Fang, Fang & Yu, Songyuan & Liu, Mingxi, 2020. "An improved Shapley value-based profit allocation method for CHP-VPP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Dong, Lianxin & Fan, Shuai & Wang, Zhihua & Xiao, Jucheng & Zhou, Huan & Li, Zuyi & He, Guangyu, 2021. "An adaptive decentralized economic dispatch method for virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    11. Yang, Shenbo & Tan, Zhongfu & Lin, Hongyu & Li, Peng & De, Gejirifu & Zhou, Feng’ao & Ju, Liwei, 2020. "A two-stage optimization model for Park Integrated Energy System operation and benefit allocation considering the effect of Time-Of-Use energy price," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Tong Xing & Hongyu Lin & Zhongfu Tan & Liwei Ju, 2019. "Coordinated Energy Management for Micro Energy Systems Considering Carbon Emissions Using Multi-Objective Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Zhang, Junxia & Li, Xingmei & Jia, Dongqing & Zhou, Yuexin, 2023. "A Bi-level programming for union battery swapping stations location-routing problem under joint distribution and cost allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    14. Ju, Liwei & Zhao, Rui & Tan, Qinliang & Lu, Yan & Tan, Qingkun & Wang, Wei, 2019. "A multi-objective robust scheduling model and solution algorithm for a novel virtual power plant connected with power-to-gas and gas storage tank considering uncertainty and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1336-1355.
    15. Rahim, Sahar & Wang, Zhen & Ju, Ping, 2022. "Overview and applications of Robust optimization in the avant-garde energy grid infrastructure: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    16. Michelle Maceas Henao & Jairo José Espinosa Oviedo, 2022. "Bidding Strategy for VPP and Economic Feasibility Study of the Optimal Sizing of Storage Systems to Face the Uncertainty of Solar Generation Modelled with IGDT," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Mei, Shufan & Tan, Qinliang & Liu, Yuan & Trivedi, Anupam & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2023. "Optimal bidding strategy for virtual power plant participating in combined electricity and ancillary services market considering dynamic demand response price and integrated consumption satisfaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    18. Natalia Naval & Jose M. Yusta, 2020. "Water-Energy Management for Demand Charges and Energy Cost Optimization of a Pumping Stations System under a Renewable Virtual Power Plant Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Mahmud, Khizir & Khan, Behram & Ravishankar, Jayashri & Ahmadi, Abdollah & Siano, Pierluigi, 2020. "An internet of energy framework with distributed energy resources, prosumers and small-scale virtual power plants: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    20. Sun, Qie & Fu, Yu & Lin, Haiyang & Wennersten, Ronald, 2022. "A novel integrated stochastic programming-information gap decision theory (IGDT) approach for optimization of integrated energy systems (IESs) with multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:310:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922000927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.