IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v297y2021ics0306261921006036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the temporal granularity of joint energy-reserve markets in a high-RES system

Author

Listed:
  • Hermans, Mathias
  • Bruninx, Kenneth
  • Van den Bergh, Kenneth
  • Poncelet, Kris
  • Delarue, Erik

Abstract

The cost-efficient integration of variable renewable power (vRES) requires adequate operating reserve and energy markets. This paper focusses on the benefits of increasing the temporal granularity of joint energy-operating reserve markets in a case study on two high-vRES systems. Specifically, the impact of the frequency (i.e., how often reserves are sized and procured) and the resolution or contract duration (i.e., the length of the sizing and procurement blocks) is isolated by comparing year-long unit commitment and economic dispatch simulation results. We optimize the power system’s operation in consecutive stages: scheduling of generation units with procurement of reserves, intra-day adjustments of generation schedules and real-time activation of flexibility to compensate for imbalances. The results suggest that dynamic and more frequent sizing, limiting the reserve procurement contract duration and a higher procurement frequency allow reducing the total operating cost by 1.5–1.8%, while eliminating scarcity on reserve markets. These design changes facilitate the integration of intermittent renewables in reserve markets. Finally, some challenges following the proposed market design changes are highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Hermans, Mathias & Bruninx, Kenneth & Van den Bergh, Kenneth & Poncelet, Kris & Delarue, Erik, 2021. "On the temporal granularity of joint energy-reserve markets in a high-RES system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:297:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921006036
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921006036
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10016 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Schulze, Tim & McKinnon, Ken, 2016. "The value of stochastic programming in day-ahead and intra-day generation unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 592-605.
    3. Jacqueline Boucher & Yves Smeers, 2001. "Alternative Models of Restructured Electricity Systems, Part 1: No Market Power," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 821-838, December.
    4. Kristof De Vos & Nicolas Stevens & Olivier Devolder & Anthony Papavasiliou & Bob Hebb & James Matthys-Donnadieu, 2019. "Dynamic dimensioning approach for operations reserves: proof of concept in Belgium," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2993, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Dallinger, Bettina & Auer, Hans & Lettner, Georg, 2018. "Impact of harmonised common balancing capacity procurement in selected Central European electricity balancing markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 351-368.
    6. Tuohy, Aidan & Meibom, Peter & Denny, Eleanor & O'Malley, Mark, 2009. "Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration," MPRA Paper 34849, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Borne, Olivier & Perez, Yannick & Petit, Marc, 2018. "Market integration or bids granularity to enhance flexibility provision by batteries of electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 140-148.
    8. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S., 2018. "Incorporating unit commitment aspects to the European electricity markets algorithm: An optimization model for the joint clearing of energy and reserve markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 235-258.
    9. Marco Cometto & Jan Horst Keppler, 2012. "Nuclear Energy and Renewables - System Effects in Low-Carbon Electricity Systems," Working Papers hal-01609471, HAL.
    10. De Vos, K. & Stevens, N. & Devolder, O. & Papavasiliou, A. & Hebb, B. & Matthys-Donnadieu, J., 2019. "Dynamic dimensioning approach for operating reserves: Proof of concept in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.
    11. Poplavskaya, Ksenia & Lago, Jesus & de Vries, Laurens, 2020. "Effect of market design on strategic bidding behavior: Model-based analysis of European electricity balancing markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    12. BOUCHER , Jacqueline & SMEERS, Yves, 2001. "Alternative models of restructured electricity systems, part 1: no market power," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1538, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristian Balzer & Joaquín Lazo & David Watts, 2023. "Economic Model of Ancillary Services in Real Time for Frequency Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Gao, Shuang & Jurasz, Jakub & Li, Hailong & Corsetti, Edoardo & Yan, Jinyue, 2022. "Potential benefits from participating in day-ahead and regulation markets for CHPs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hermans, Mathias & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2020. "Impact of generator start-up lead times on short-term scheduling with high shares of renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Rancilio, G. & Rossi, A. & Falabretti, D. & Galliani, A. & Merlo, M., 2022. "Ancillary services markets in europe: Evolution and regulatory trade-offs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Martin Weibelzahl & Alexandra Märtz, 2020. "Optimal storage and transmission investments in a bilevel electricity market model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 911-940, April.
    4. Gurkan, G. & Langestraat, R., 2013. "Modeling And Analysis Of Renewable Energy Obligations And Technology Bandings In the UK Electricity Market," Discussion Paper 2013-016, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Frederic Murphy & Axel Pierru & Yves Smeers, 2016. "A Tutorial on Building Policy Models as Mixed-Complementarity Problems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 465-481, December.
    6. Benjamin F. Hobbs & J. S. Pang, 2007. "Nash-Cournot Equilibria in Electric Power Markets with Piecewise Linear Demand Functions and Joint Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 113-127, February.
    7. Kang, Jidong & Wu, Zhuochun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2023. "A stochastic-robust optimization model for inter-regional power system planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1234-1248.
    8. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Le Cadre, Hélène & Mezghani, Ilyès & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 317-339.
    10. Ambrosius, M. & Egerer, J. & Grimm, V. & Weijde, A.H. van der, 2020. "Uncertain bidding zone configurations: The role of expectations for transmission and generation capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 343-359.
    11. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A. Ismael F., 2021. "A review of co-optimization approaches for operational and planning problems in the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    12. Gurkan, G. & Langestraat, R. & Ozdemir, O., 2013. "Introducing CO2 Allowances, Higher Prices For All Consumers; Higher Revenues For Whom?," Other publications TiSEM 5c180250-ae89-406a-992d-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Lago, Jesus & Poplavskaya, Ksenia & Suryanarayana, Gowri & De Schutter, Bart, 2021. "A market framework for grid balancing support through imbalances trading," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Atakan, Semih & Gangammanavar, Harsha & Sen, Suvrajeet, 2022. "Towards a sustainable power grid: Stochastic hierarchical planning for high renewable integration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 381-391.
    15. Gürkan, G. & Ozdemir, O. & Smeers, Y., 2013. "Strategic Generation Capacity Choice under Demand Uncertainty : Analysis of Nash Equilibria in Electricity Markets," Discussion Paper 2013-044, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Gürkan, G. & Ozdemir, O. & Smeers, Y., 2013. "Generation Capacity Investments in Electricity Markets : Perfect Competition," Discussion Paper 2013-045, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    17. Elisabetta Allevi & Adriana Gnudi & Igor V. Konnov & Giorgia Oggioni, 2017. "Dynamic Spatial Auction Market Models with General Cost Mappings," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 367-403, June.
    18. Ambrosius, Mirjam & Egerer, Jonas & Grimm, Veronika & van der Weijde, Adriaan H., 2022. "Risk aversion in multilevel electricity market models with different congestion pricing regimes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Heffron, Raphael J. & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Sumarno, Theresia & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2022. "How different electricity pricing systems affect the energy trilemma: Assessing Indonesia's electricity market transition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Krebs, Vanessa & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin, 2018. "Uniqueness and multiplicity of market equilibria on DC power flow networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 165-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:297:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921006036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.