IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v279y2020ics0306261920312782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations for maintaining resource adequacy of electricity systems with high penetrations of PV and storage

Author

Listed:
  • Cole, Wesley
  • Greer, Daniel
  • Ho, Jonathan
  • Margolis, Robert

Abstract

Solar photovoltaic (PV) and energy storage deployment has grown rapidly in recent years and is expected to continue as the costs of these technologies continues to decline. As PV penetration grows, peak net load hours—where net load is load minus variable renewable energy generation—become increasingly important for understanding resource adequacy of power systems. In this work, we evaluate scenarios of a future U.S. power system with high penetrations of PV. We do so by using a national-scale capacity expansion model to consider 15 scenarios with national annual PV generation penetration levels of 16%–47%, combined wind and PV penetrations are 40%–64%, and storage capacity ranging from 5% to 47% of peak demand. The modeled scenarios incorporate 7-years of coincident weather data and load profiles (2007–2013) for the contiguous United States. In doing so, we evaluate when peak net load hours occur and how their occurrence is impacted by PV penetration, region, and weather. We find that with increasing PV penetration, peak net load hours move from afternoon periods to evenings or from midmorning to early morning, and that the frequency of winter peak net load hours increases. We also simulate hourly system dispatch in 3 of the 15 scenarios using a commercially available unit commitment and dispatch model—PLEXOS-- to evaluate with much greater resolution how the systems behave under specific weather conditions observed from 2007 to 2013. The hourly results show substantial shifts in how peak net load hours are served as PV penetration increases, and that how the system serves those top peak net load hours varies considerably across different regions of the country. Finally, we employ a simple method for estimating the impacts of snow cover in the high PV penetration scenarios and find that for the moderate and highest levels of PV we examine, snow cover has the potential to result in capacity and energy shortfalls.

Suggested Citation

  • Cole, Wesley & Greer, Daniel & Ho, Jonathan & Margolis, Robert, 2020. "Considerations for maintaining resource adequacy of electricity systems with high penetrations of PV and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:279:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920312782
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920312782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denholm, Paul & Nunemaker, Jacob & Gagnon, Pieter & Cole, Wesley, 2020. "The potential for battery energy storage to provide peaking capacity in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1269-1277.
    2. Michael Milligan & Bethany Frew & Eduardo Ibanez & Juha Kiviluoma & Hannele Holttinen & Lennart Söder, 2017. "Capacity value assessments of wind power," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), January.
    3. Mai, Trieu & Mulcahy, David & Hand, M. Maureen & Baldwin, Samuel F., 2014. "Envisioning a renewable electricity future for the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 374-386.
    4. Draxl, Caroline & Clifton, Andrew & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & McCaa, Jim, 2015. "The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 355-366.
    5. Cohen, Stuart M. & Caron, Justin, 2018. "The economic impacts of high wind penetration scenarios in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 558-573.
    6. Sengupta, Manajit & Xie, Yu & Lopez, Anthony & Habte, Aron & Maclaurin, Galen & Shelby, James, 2018. "The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 51-60.
    7. Cole, Wesley & Frew, Bethany & Gagnon, Pieter & Reimers, Andrew & Zuboy, Jarett & Margolis, Robert, 2018. "Envisioning a low-cost solar future: Exploring the potential impact of Achieving the SunShot 2030 targets for photovoltaics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 690-704.
    8. Pfenninger, Stefan, 2017. "Dealing with multiple decades of hourly wind and PV time series in energy models: A comparison of methods to reduce time resolution and the planning implications of inter-annual variability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Zhou, Ella & Cole, Wesley & Frew, Bethany, 2018. "Valuing variable renewable energy for peak demand requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 499-511.
    10. Björn Nykvist & Måns Nilsson, 2015. "Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 329-332, April.
    11. Ryan Wiser & Karen Jenni & Joachim Seel & Erin Baker & Maureen Hand & Eric Lantz & Aaron Smith, 2016. "Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(10), pages 1-8, October.
    12. Crago, Christine L. & Koegler, Eric, 2018. "Drivers of growth in commercial-scale solar PV capacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 481-491.
    13. Murphy, Sinnott & Lavin, Luke & Apt, Jay, 2020. "Resource adequacy implications of temperature-dependent electric generator availability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    14. Zhao, Jiayun & Kucuksari, Sadik & Mazhari, Esfandyar & Son, Young-Jun, 2013. "Integrated analysis of high-penetration PV and PHEV with energy storage and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 35-51.
    15. Reimers, Andrew & Cole, Wesley & Frew, Bethany, 2019. "The impact of planning reserve margins in long-term planning models of the electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Lantz, Eric & Mai, Trieu & Wiser, Ryan H. & Krishnan, Venkat, 2016. "Long-term implications of sustained wind power growth in the United States: Direct electric system impacts and costs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 832-846.
    17. Felix Creutzig & Peter Agoston & Jan Christoph Goldschmidt & Gunnar Luderer & Gregory Nemet & Robert C. Pietzcker, 2017. "The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 1-9, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elkholy, M.H. & Metwally, Hamid & Farahat, M.A. & Senjyu, Tomonobu & Elsayed Lotfy, Mohammed, 2022. "Smart centralized energy management system for autonomous microgrid using FPGA," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    2. Song, Siming & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2022. "Low carbon transition of China's electric and heating sector considering reliability: A modelling and optimization approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Ploussard, Quentin & Veselka, Thomas D. & Oikonomou, Konstantinos & Voisin, Nathalie, 2022. "Hydro-economics tradeoff surfaces to guide unit commitment in production cost models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    4. Mai, Trieu & Lopez, Anthony & Mowers, Matthew & Lantz, Eric, 2021. "Interactions of wind energy project siting, wind resource potential, and the evolution of the U.S. power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Sohani, Ali & Cornaro, Cristina & Shahverdian, Mohammad Hassan & Moser, David & Pierro, Marco & Olabi, Abdul Ghani & Karimi, Nader & Nižetić, Sandro & Li, Larry K.B. & Doranehgard, Mohammad Hossein, 2023. "Techno-economic evaluation of a hybrid photovoltaic system with hot/cold water storage for poly-generation in a residential building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    6. Deakin, Matthew & Bloomfield, Hannah & Greenwood, David & Sheehy, Sarah & Walker, Sara & Taylor, Phil C., 2021. "Impacts of heat decarbonization on system adequacy considering increased meteorological sensitivity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    7. Schleifer, Anna H. & Murphy, Caitlin A. & Cole, Wesley J. & Denholm, Paul, 2022. "Exploring the design space of PV-plus-battery system configurations under evolving grid conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    8. Khaled Osmani & Ahmad Haddad & Mohammad Alkhedher & Thierry Lemenand & Bruno Castanier & Mohamad Ramadan, 2023. "A Novel MPPT-Based Lithium-Ion Battery Solar Charger for Operation under Fluctuating Irradiance Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Tumiran & Lesnanto Multa Putranto & Sarjiya & Fransisco Danang Wijaya & Adi Priyanto & Ira Savitri, 2022. "Generation Expansion Planning Based on Local Renewable Energy Resources: A Case Study of the Isolated Ambon-Seram Power System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Wu, Jing & Zhang, Ling & Liu, Zhongbing & Wu, Zhenghong, 2021. "Coupled optical-electrical-thermal analysis of a semi-transparent photovoltaic glazing façade under building shadow," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mai, Trieu & Cole, Wesley & Reimers, Andrew, 2019. "Setting cost targets for zero-emission electricity generation technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 582-592.
    2. Mai, Trieu & Bistline, John & Sun, Yinong & Cole, Wesley & Marcy, Cara & Namovicz, Chris & Young, David, 2018. "The role of input assumptions and model structures in projections of variable renewable energy: A multi-model perspective of the U.S. electricity system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 313-324.
    3. Bromley-Dulfano, Isaac & Florez, Julian & Craig, Michael T., 2021. "Reliability benefits of wide-area renewable energy planning across the Western United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1487-1499.
    4. Frazier, A. Will & Cole, Wesley & Denholm, Paul & Greer, Daniel & Gagnon, Pieter, 2020. "Assessing the potential of battery storage as a peaking capacity resource in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    5. Mai, Trieu & Lopez, Anthony & Mowers, Matthew & Lantz, Eric, 2021. "Interactions of wind energy project siting, wind resource potential, and the evolution of the U.S. power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Mills, Andrew D. & Rodriguez, Pía, 2020. "A simple and fast algorithm for estimating the capacity credit of solar and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    7. Denholm, Paul & Mai, Trieu, 2019. "Timescales of energy storage needed for reducing renewable energy curtailment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 388-399.
    8. Bistline, John & Blanford, Geoffrey & Mai, Trieu & Merrick, James, 2021. "Modeling variable renewable energy and storage in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    9. Morgenthaler, Simon & Dünzen, Justus & Stadler, Ingo & Witthaut, Dirk, 2021. "Three stages in the co-transformation of the energy and mobility sectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Craig, Michael & Guerra, Omar J. & Brancucci, Carlo & Pambour, Kwabena Addo & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2020. "Valuing intra-day coordination of electric power and natural gas system operations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Zimmerman, Ryan & Panda, Anurag & Bulović, Vladimir, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment and deployment strategies for vertically-mounted photovoltaic panels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Niina Helistö & Juha Kiviluoma & Hannele Holttinen & Jose Daniel Lara & Bri‐Mathias Hodge, 2019. "Including operational aspects in the planning of power systems with large amounts of variable generation: A review of modeling approaches," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), September.
    13. Italo Fernandes & Felipe M. Pimenta & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2022. "Exploring the Complementarity of Offshore Wind Sites to Reduce the Seasonal Variability of Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Harrison-Atlas, Dylan & Murphy, Caitlin & Schleifer, Anna & Grue, Nicholas, 2022. "Temporal complementarity and value of wind-PV hybrid systems across the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 111-123.
    15. Jayadev, Gopika & Leibowicz, Benjamin D. & Kutanoglu, Erhan, 2020. "U.S. electricity infrastructure of the future: Generation and transmission pathways through 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    16. Svitnič, Tibor & Sundmacher, Kai, 2022. "Renewable methanol production: Optimization-based design, scheduling and waste-heat utilization with the FluxMax approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    17. Taylan G. Topcu & Konstantinos Triantis, 2022. "An ex-ante DEA method for representing contextual uncertainties and stakeholder risk preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 395-423, February.
    18. Ogunmodede, Oluwaseun & Anderson, Kate & Cutler, Dylan & Newman, Alexandra, 2021. "Optimizing design and dispatch of a renewable energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    19. Li, Can & Conejo, Antonio J. & Liu, Peng & Omell, Benjamin P. & Siirola, John D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2022. "Mixed-integer linear programming models and algorithms for generation and transmission expansion planning of power systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1071-1082.
    20. Weber, Juliane & Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula & Gillessen, Bastian & Schumann, Diana & Hörsch, Jonas & Brown, Tom & Witthaut, Dirk, 2019. "Counter-intuitive behaviour of energy system models under CO2 caps and prices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 22-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:279:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920312782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.