IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v274y2020ics0306261920308047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redox mediator-modified biocathode enables highly efficient microbial electro-synthesis of methane from carbon dioxide

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Hou-Yun
  • Wang, Yi-Xuan
  • He, Chuan-Shu
  • Qin, Yuan
  • Li, Wen-Qiang
  • Li, Wei-Hua
  • Mu, Yang

Abstract

Regulating cathodic interface properties towards highly effective CH4 production from CO2 is of great importance for energy storage using microbial electro-synthesis (MES). Herein, the feasibility and mechanism of two typical redox mediators, neutral red (NR) and anthraquinone-2, 6-disulfonate (AQDS), were evaluated for the improvement of CH4 formation from CO2 reduction in mixed-culture biocathodes of MESs. Results showed that the CH4 formation rates of biocathodes after modification with NR and AQDS were 5.8 and 3.5 times higher than that of unaltered cathodes. Moreover, the coulombic efficiency of CH4 formation improved from 44.27 ± 4.01% of the control cathode to 64.30 ± 4.83% and 62.26 ± 2.87% after modification with NR and AQDS, respectively. Consequently, the energy efficiency of MESs after cathode modification with NR and AQDS increased to 58.33 ± 3.17% and 53.21 ± 4.11% compared to 38.20 ± 3.12% without modification. Such improvements were likely attributed to the enhanced extracellular electron transfer of microbes, the reduction in internal resistances and the enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the mixed-culture biocathodes after modification with NR and AQDS. This study provides an alternative strategy to regulate cathodic interface in MESs for renewable energy storage and biomethane production from CO2.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Hou-Yun & Wang, Yi-Xuan & He, Chuan-Shu & Qin, Yuan & Li, Wen-Qiang & Li, Wei-Hua & Mu, Yang, 2020. "Redox mediator-modified biocathode enables highly efficient microbial electro-synthesis of methane from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:274:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920308047
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920308047
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alivand, Masood S. & Mazaheri, Omid & Wu, Yue & Stevens, Geoffrey W. & Scholes, Colin A. & Mumford, Kathryn A., 2019. "Development of aqueous-based phase change amino acid solvents for energy-efficient CO2 capture: The role of antisolvent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Xie, Yujiao & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2 separation from biogas with conventional ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 75-87.
    3. Gorre, Jachin & Ortloff, Felix & van Leeuwen, Charlotte, 2019. "Production costs for synthetic methane in 2030 and 2050 of an optimized Power-to-Gas plant with intermediate hydrogen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Collet, Pierre & Flottes, Eglantine & Favre, Alain & Raynal, Ludovic & Pierre, Hélène & Capela, Sandra & Peregrina, Carlos, 2017. "Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 282-295.
    5. Al-Kalbani, Haitham & Xuan, Jin & García, Susana & Wang, Huizhi, 2016. "Comparative energetic assessment of methanol production from CO2: Chemical versus electrochemical process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pelaz, Guillermo & González, Rubén & Morán, Antonio & Escapa, Adrián, 2023. "Elucidating the impact of power interruptions on microbial electromethanogenesis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    2. Pan, Qin & Tian, Xiaochun & Li, Junpeng & Wu, Xuee & Zhao, Feng, 2021. "Interfacial electron transfer for carbon dioxide valorization in hybrid inorganic-microbial systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    3. Bian, Bin & Shi, Le & Katuri, Krishna P. & Xu, Jiajie & Wang, Peng & Saikaly, Pascal E., 2020. "Efficient solar-to-acetate conversion from CO2 through microbial electrosynthesis coupled with stable photoanode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corey Duncan & Robin Roche & Samir Jemei & Marie-Cécile Péra, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Post-Print hal-03692975, HAL.
    2. Masoud Khatibi & Abbas Rabiee & Amir Bagheri, 2023. "Integrated Electricity and Gas Systems Planning: New Opportunities, and a Detailed Assessment of Relevant Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    3. Ghafoori, Mohammad Samim & Loubar, Khaled & Marin-Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand, 2022. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of biomethane production via landfill biogas upgrading and power-to-gas technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    4. Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & de Santoli, Livio, 2022. "Can the renewable energy share increase in electricity and gas grids takes out the competitiveness of gas-driven CHP plants for distributed generation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    5. Duncan, Corey & Roche, Robin & Jemei, Samir & Pera, Marie-Cécile, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    6. Katla, Daria & Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2020. "Evaluation of electricity generation subsystem of power-to-gas-to-power unit using gas expander and heat recovery steam generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Hijazi, O. & Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Amer, B.M.A. & Amer, M.A. & Badr, M. & Bernhardt, H., 2020. "Life cycle assessment of the use of nanomaterials in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 417-424.
    8. Victor Hugo Souza de Abreu & Victória Gonçalves Ferreira Pereira & Laís Ferreira Crispino Proença & Fabio Souza Toniolo & Andrea Souza Santos, 2023. "A Systematic Study on Techno-Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Fambri, Gabriele & Diaz-Londono, Cesar & Mazza, Andrea & Badami, Marco & Sihvonen, Teemu & Weiss, Robert, 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of Power-to-Gas plants in a gas and electricity distribution network system with high renewable energy penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    10. Singlitico, Alessandro & Goggins, Jamie & Monaghan, Rory F.D., 2019. "The role of life cycle assessment in the sustainable transition to a decarbonised gas network through green gas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 16-28.
    11. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    12. Abu Yousuf & Md Shahadat Hossain & Nishat Paul & Md Woashib Shikder & Deepak Kumar & Domenico Pirozzi & Ahmed Nazmus Sakib & Pejman Kazempoor, 2023. "Process Integration Approach to the Methanol (MeOH) Production Variability from Syngas and Industrial Waste Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Jacopo Bacenetti, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy from Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-5, July.
    14. Zhong, Like & Yao, Erren & Zou, Hansen & Xi, Guang, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a directly solar-driven power-to-methane system by detailed distributed parameter method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    15. Guilera, Jordi & Andreu, Teresa & Basset, Núria & Boeltken, Tim & Timm, Friedemann & Mallol, Ignasi & Morante, Joan Ramon, 2020. "Synthetic natural gas production from biogas in a waste water treatment plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1301-1308.
    16. Gaballah, Eid S. & Abdelkader, Tarek Kh & Luo, Shuai & Yuan, Qiaoxia & El-Fatah Abomohra, Abd, 2020. "Enhancement of biogas production by integrated solar heating system: A pilot study using tubular digester," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Barbera, Elena & Menegon, Silvia & Banzato, Donatella & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Bertucco, Alberto, 2019. "From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-673.
    18. Masood S. Alivand & Omid Mazaheri & Yue Wu & Ali Zavabeti & Andrew J. Christofferson & Nastaran Meftahi & Salvy P. Russo & Geoffrey W. Stevens & Colin A. Scholes & Kathryn A. Mumford, 2022. "Engineered assembly of water-dispersible nanocatalysts enables low-cost and green CO2 capture," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Yusuf, Noor & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    20. Ingrao, Carlo & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Adamczyk, Janusz & Ferrante, Valentina & Messineo, Antonio & Huisingh, Donald, 2019. "Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems: A comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 296-307.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:274:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920308047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.