IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i18p6557-d1238147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Integration Approach to the Methanol (MeOH) Production Variability from Syngas and Industrial Waste Gases

Author

Listed:
  • Abu Yousuf

    (Department of Chemical Engineering & Polymer Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh
    Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Md Shahadat Hossain

    (Department of Chemical Engineering & Polymer Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh
    Department of Chemical Engineering, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • Nishat Paul

    (Department of Chemical Engineering & Polymer Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh)

  • Md Woashib Shikder

    (Department of Chemical Engineering & Polymer Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh)

  • Deepak Kumar

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • Domenico Pirozzi

    (Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Ahmed Nazmus Sakib

    (Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Pejman Kazempoor

    (Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

Abstract

Methanol is expected to be a possible solution for reducing global greenhouse gas emissions and minimizing the dependency on fossil fuels. This paper presents a systematic approach of methanol (MeOH) production from industrial waste gases including flue gas (FG) and coke oven gas (COG) that are considered an important threat to the environment. The impact of process parameters, including dimensional parameters (length, diameter, and number of tubes) and operational parameters (reactor temperature, pressure, and thermal fluid temperature) over the MeOH synthesis, are investigated by Aspen Plus. Firstly, the synthesis process is designed and optimized using syngas (SG) as a feed material. Secondly, by replacing the feed material with FG and COG, methanol production variability is investigated and demonstrated for the same optimized process. Afterward, an efficient heat exchange network system is developed for all three different processes using Aspen Energy Analyzer. The optimized dimensional parameters of the MeOH synthesis reactor are determined to be a length of 12 m, a diameter of 0.06 m, and 5000 tubes for achieving a conversion rate of 75%. Meanwhile, the optimized operational parameters are identified as a reactor temperature of 209 ° C , reactor pressure of 70 bar, and thermal fluid temperature of 196 ° C . Furthermore, the influence of the stoichiometric number (SN) on the process was observed with higher SN values resulting in increased hydrogen (H 2 ) concentration and an improved forward reaction of MeOH synthesis, leading to higher conversion rates. The findings and insights gained from this study can serve further improvements and advancements in MeOH synthesis processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Abu Yousuf & Md Shahadat Hossain & Nishat Paul & Md Woashib Shikder & Deepak Kumar & Domenico Pirozzi & Ahmed Nazmus Sakib & Pejman Kazempoor, 2023. "Process Integration Approach to the Methanol (MeOH) Production Variability from Syngas and Industrial Waste Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6557-:d:1238147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Nianqi & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Sunden, Bengt & Wu, Zan & Wang, Qiuwang & Zeng, Min, 2022. "Heat exchanger network synthesis considering detailed thermal-hydraulic performance: Methods and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Balki, Mustafa Kemal & Sayin, Cenk, 2014. "The effect of compression ratio on the performance, emissions and combustion of an SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with pure ethanol, methanol and unleaded gasoline," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 194-201.
    3. Anicic, B. & Trop, P. & Goricanec, D., 2014. "Comparison between two methods of methanol production from carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 279-289.
    4. Al-Kalbani, Haitham & Xuan, Jin & García, Susana & Wang, Huizhi, 2016. "Comparative energetic assessment of methanol production from CO2: Chemical versus electrochemical process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Simon Araya & Vincenzo Liso & Xiaoti Cui & Na Li & Jimin Zhu & Simon Lennart Sahlin & Søren Højgaard Jensen & Mads Pagh Nielsen & Søren Knudsen Kær, 2020. "A Review of The Methanol Economy: The Fuel Cell Route," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Chintala, V. & Subramanian, K.A., 2015. "Experimental investigations on effect of different compression ratios on enhancement of maximum hydrogen energy share in a compression ignition engine under dual-fuel mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 448-462.
    3. Renzi, Massimiliano & Bietresato, Marco & Mazzetto, Fabrizio, 2016. "An experimental evaluation of the performance of a SI internal combustion engine for agricultural purposes fuelled with different bioethanol blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1069-1080.
    4. Teng, Sin Yong & Orosz, Ákos & How, Bing Shen & Jansen, Jeroen J. & Friedler, Ferenc, 2023. "Retrofit heat exchanger network optimization via graph-theoretical approach: Pinch-bounded N-best solutions allows positional swapping," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Süleyman Şimşek & Hasan Saygın & Bülent Özdalyan, 2020. "Improvement of Fusel Oil Features and Effect of Its Use in Different Compression Ratios for an SI Engine on Performance and Emission," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Dhahad, Hayder Abed & Hasan, Ahmed Mudheher & Chaichan, Miqdam Tariq & Kazem, Hussein A., 2022. "Prognostic of diesel engine emissions and performance based on an intelligent technique for nanoparticle additives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    7. Galadima, Ahmad & Muraza, Oki, 2019. "Catalytic thermal conversion of CO2 into fuels: Perspective and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Oleg Bazaluk & Valerii Havrysh & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Elena A. Tarkhanova, 2020. "Assessment of Green Methanol Production Potential and Related Economic and Environmental Benefits: The Case of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Gong, Changming & Yi, Lin & Zhang, Zilei & Sun, Jingzhen & Liu, Fenghua, 2020. "Assessment of ultra-lean burn characteristics for a stratified-charge direct-injection spark-ignition methanol engine under different high compression ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Gong, Changming & Liu, Fenghua & Sun, Jingzhen & Wang, Kang, 2016. "Effect of compression ratio on performance and emissions of a stratified-charge DISI (direct injection spark ignition) methanol engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 166-175.
    11. Goel, Varun & Kumar, Naresh & Singh, Paramvir, 2018. "Impact of modified parameters on diesel engine characteristics using biodiesel: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2716-2729.
    12. Galusnyak, Stefan Cristian & Petrescu, Letitia & Chisalita, Dora Andreea & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of methanol production and conversion into various chemical intermediates and products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Michał Wojcieszyk & Lotta Knuutila & Yuri Kroyan & Mário de Pinto Balsemão & Rupali Tripathi & Juha Keskivali & Anna Karvo & Annukka Santasalo-Aarnio & Otto Blomstedt & Martti Larmi, 2021. "Performance of Anisole and Isobutanol as Gasoline Bio-Blendstocks for Spark Ignition Engines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Zhennan Zhu & Kun Liang & Xinwen Chen & Zhongwei Meng & Wenbin He & Hao Song, 2020. "Laminar Flame Characteristics of Premixed Methanol–Water–Air Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Svitnič, Tibor & Sundmacher, Kai, 2022. "Renewable methanol production: Optimization-based design, scheduling and waste-heat utilization with the FluxMax approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    16. Biswal, Abinash & Kale, Rakesh & Balusamy, Saravanan & Banerjee, Raja & Kolhe, Pankaj, 2019. "Lemon peel oil as an alternative fuel for GDI engines: A spray characterization perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 249-263.
    17. Tang, Qingli & Ji, Wenchao & Russell, Christopher K. & Cheng, Zhiwen & Zhang, Yulong & Fan, Maohong & Shen, Zhemin, 2019. "Understanding the catalytic mechanisms of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on unsupported and supported Ga-Ni clusters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Hotta, Santosh Kumar & Sahoo, Niranjan & Mohanty, Kaustubha & Kulkarni, Vinayak, 2020. "Ignition timing and compression ratio as effective means for the improvement in the operating characteristics of a biogas fueled spark ignition engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 854-867.
    19. Nuthan Prasad, B.S. & Pandey, Jayashish Kumar & Kumar, G.N., 2020. "Impact of changing compression ratio on engine characteristics of an SI engine fueled with equi-volume blend of methanol and gasoline," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Ma, Qian & Chang, Yuan & Yuan, Bo & Song, Zhaozheng & Xue, Jinjun & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2022. "Utilizing carbon dioxide from refinery flue gas for methanol production: System design and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6557-:d:1238147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.