IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v253y2019ic67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of a hybrid energy plant by integrating the cumulative energy demand

Author

Listed:
  • Bahlawan, Hilal
  • Morini, Mirko
  • Pinelli, Michele
  • Poganietz, Witold-Roger
  • Spina, Pier Ruggero
  • Venturini, Mauro

Abstract

This paper deals with the optimal design of a hybrid energy plant, which can include the following energy systems: solar thermal collector, photovoltaic panel, hybrid photovoltaic/thermal solar system, combined heat and power system, organic Rankine cycle, absorption chiller, air source heat pump, ground source heat pump and thermal energy storage. Three different configurations are analyzed. In the first configuration, the abovementioned systems are considered with the exception of the hybrid photovoltaic/thermal solar system and organic Rankine cycle. In the second configuration, a hybrid photovoltaic/thermal solar system is also included and in the third configuration the use of an organic Rankine cycle as the bottoming cycle of the combined heat and power system is evaluated. The optimization goal is to minimize the primary energy demanded throughout the manufacturing and operation phase of the hybrid energy plant. The challenge of non-linear life cycle inventory scaling of energy systems is also addressed. A tower located in northern Italy is selected as a case study and two different approaches are evaluated. The first approach consists of solving the sizing optimization by minimizing primary energy consumption only during the operation phase, while in the second approach primary energy consumption is minimized throughout the life cycle of the plant by integrating the life cycle assessment into the optimization process. The results show that, if life cycle assessment is integrated, the optimal sizes of plant components are different and the primary energy saving throughout the life cycle is always higher. With reference to the LCA integrated approach and compared to the first configuration, the use of a hybrid photovoltaic/thermal solar system instead of separate solar thermal collector and photovoltaic panels is more efficient and may allow a primary energy saving of about 4%. Furthermore, compared to a conventional plant, the primary energy saving achievable with the first configuration is approximately 14%, while the primary energy saving increases to about 17% for the second and third configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahlawan, Hilal & Morini, Mirko & Pinelli, Michele & Poganietz, Witold-Roger & Spina, Pier Ruggero & Venturini, Mauro, 2019. "Optimization of a hybrid energy plant by integrating the cumulative energy demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:253:y:2019:i:c:67
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919311584
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allouhi, A. & Agrouaz, Y. & Benzakour Amine, Mohammed & Rehman, S. & Buker, M.S. & Kousksou, T. & Jamil, A. & Benbassou, A., 2017. "Design optimization of a multi-temperature solar thermal heating system for an industrial process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 382-392.
    2. Frederick T. Moore, 1959. "Economies of Scale: Some Statistical Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 73(2), pages 232-245.
    3. Wieland, Christoph & Meinel, Dominik & Eyerer, Sebastian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2016. "Innovative CHP concept for ORC and its benefit compared to conventional concepts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 478-490.
    4. Colclough, Shane & McGrath, Teresa, 2015. "Net energy analysis of a solar combi system with Seasonal Thermal Energy Store," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 611-616.
    5. Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Bernal-Agustín, José L. & Yusta-Loyo, José M. & Domínguez-Navarro, José A. & Ramírez-Rosado, Ignacio J. & Lujano, Juan & Aso, Ismael, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV–wind–diesel systems with batteries storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4033-4041.
    6. Desideri, Umberto & Proietti, Stefania & Zepparelli, Francesco & Sdringola, Paolo & Bini, Silvia, 2012. "Life Cycle Assessment of a ground-mounted 1778kWp photovoltaic plant and comparison with traditional energy production systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 930-943.
    7. Lantz, Mikael, 2012. "The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – A comparison of different CHP technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 502-511.
    8. Comodi, Gabriele & Bevilacqua, Maurizio & Caresana, Flavio & Paciarotti, Claudia & Pelagalli, Leonardo & Venella, Paola, 2016. "Life cycle assessment and energy-CO2-economic payback analyses of renewable domestic hot water systems with unglazed and glazed solar thermal panels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 944-955.
    9. Kelly, K.A. & McManus, M.C. & Hammond, G.P., 2014. "An energy and carbon life cycle assessment of industrial CHP (combined heat and power) in the context of a low carbon UK," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 812-821.
    10. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Ayodele, T.R. & Akinola, O.A., 2016. "Optimal allocation and sizing of PV/Wind/Split-diesel/Battery hybrid energy system for minimizing life cycle cost, carbon emission and dump energy of remote residential building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 153-171.
    11. Landelle, Arnaud & Tauveron, Nicolas & Haberschill, Philippe & Revellin, Rémi & Colasson, Stéphane, 2017. "Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1172-1187.
    12. Varun & Bhat, I.K. & Prakash, Ravi, 2009. "LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 1067-1073, June.
    13. Jing, You-Yin & Bai, He & Wang, Jiang-Jiang, 2012. "Multi-objective optimization design and operation strategy analysis of BCHP system based on life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 405-416.
    14. Wang, Jiangjiang & Yang, Ying & Mao, Tianzhi & Sui, Jun & Jin, Hongguang, 2015. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) optimization of solar-assisted hybrid CCHP system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 38-52.
    15. Marloes Caduff & Mark A.J. Huijbregts & Annette Koehler & Hans-Jörg Althaus & Stefanie Hellweg, 2014. "Scaling Relationships in Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 393-406, May.
    16. Whiting, Andrew & Azapagic, Adisa, 2014. "Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 181-193.
    17. Kabakian, V. & McManus, M.C. & Harajli, H., 2015. "Attributional life cycle assessment of mounted 1.8kWp monocrystalline photovoltaic system with batteries and comparison with fossil energy production system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 428-437.
    18. Huang, Pei & Huang, Gongsheng & Sun, Yongjun, 2018. "Uncertainty-based life-cycle analysis of near-zero energy buildings for performance improvements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 486-498.
    19. Moore, A.D. & Urmee, T. & Bahri, P.A. & Rezvani, S. & Baverstock, G.F., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of domestic hot water systems in Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 187-196.
    20. Kang, Jing & Wang, Shengwei, 2018. "Robust optimal design of distributed energy systems based on life-cycle performance analysis using a probabilistic approach considering uncertainties of design inputs and equipment degradations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 615-627.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isye Hayatina & Amar Auckaili & Mohammed Farid, 2023. "Review on the Life Cycle Assessment of Thermal Energy Storage Used in Building Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan & Azadi, Hossein & Van Passel, Steven & Saber, Zahra & Hosseini-Fashami, Fatemeh & Mostashari-Rad, Fatemeh & Ghasemi-Mobtaker, Hassan, 2021. "Prospects of solar systems in production chain of sunflower oil using cold press method with concentrating energy and life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Zou, Run & Li, Yuan & Liu, Jinxiang & Wang, Nana & Zeng, Qinghan & Li, Jiong, 2023. "Numerical study on the effects of spark strategies on knocking combustion in a downsized gasoline rotary engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    4. Pina, Eduardo A. & Lozano, Miguel A. & Ramos, José C. & Serra, Luis M., 2020. "Tackling thermal integration in the synthesis of polygeneration systems for buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Wang, Meng & Yu, Hang & Yang, Yikun & Lin, Xiaoyu & Guo, Haijin & Li, Chaoen & Zhou, Yue & Jing, Rui, 2021. "Unlocking emerging impacts of carbon tax on integrated energy systems through supply and demand co-optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    6. Tafavogh, Mahyar & Zahedi, Alireza, 2021. "Design and production of a novel encapsulated nano phase change materials to improve thermal efficiency of a quintuple renewable geothermal/hydro/biomass/solar/wind hybrid system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 358-378.
    7. Ren, Fukang & Wei, Ziqing & Zhai, Xiaoqiang, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization and evaluation of hybrid CCHP systems for different building types," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    8. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Alavi & Akbar Maleki & Ali Khaleghi, 2022. "Optimal site selection for wind power plant using multi-criteria decision-making methods: A case study in eastern Iran [Selection of optimal location and design of a stand-alone photovoltaic scheme," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 17, pages 1319-1337.
    9. Tilahun, Fitsum Bekele & Bhandari, Ramchandra & Mamo, Mengesha, 2021. "Design optimization of a hybrid solar-biomass plant to sustainably supply energy to industry: Methodology and case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    10. Bahlawan, Hilal & Morini, Mirko & Spina, Pier Ruggero & Venturini, Mauro, 2021. "Inventory scaling, life cycle impact assessment and design optimization of distributed energy plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xiaoyue & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Kailong, 2022. "Development of a stochastic multistage lifecycle programming model for electric power system planning – A case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Comodi, Gabriele & Bevilacqua, Maurizio & Caresana, Flavio & Paciarotti, Claudia & Pelagalli, Leonardo & Venella, Paola, 2016. "Life cycle assessment and energy-CO2-economic payback analyses of renewable domestic hot water systems with unglazed and glazed solar thermal panels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 944-955.
    3. Bany Mousa, Osama & Kara, Sami & Taylor, Robert A., 2019. "Comparative energy and greenhouse gas assessment of industrial rooftop-integrated PV and solar thermal collectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 113-123.
    4. Carnevale, E. & Lombardi, L. & Zanchi, L., 2014. "Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems: Comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 434-446.
    5. Gemina Quest & Rosalie Arendt & Christian Klemm & Vanessa Bach & Janik Budde & Peter Vennemann & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2022. "Integrated Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Power and Heat Supply for a Neighborhood: A Case Study of Herne, Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Nguyen, Hai Tra & Safder, Usman & Nhu Nguyen, X.Q. & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2020. "Multi-objective decision-making and optimal sizing of a hybrid renewable energy system to meet the dynamic energy demands of a wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Yihsuan Wu & Jian Hua, 2022. "Investigating a Retrofit Thermal Power Plant from a Sustainable Environment Perspective—A Fuel Lifecycle Assessment Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Leidong Yuan & Cheng Xu, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Low-Rank Coal Utilization for Power Generation and Energy Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Mahmud, M.A. Parvez & Huda, Nazmul & Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan & Lang, Candace, 2020. "Life-cycle impact assessment of renewable electricity generation systems in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1028-1045.
    10. Si, Pengfei & Feng, Ya & Lv, Yuexia & Rong, Xiangyang & Pan, Yungang & Liu, Xichen & Yan, Jinyue, 2017. "An optimization method applied to active solar energy systems for buildings in cold plateau areas – The case of Lhasa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 487-498.
    11. Chennaif, Mohammed & Maaouane, Mohamed & Zahboune, Hassan & Elhafyani, Mohammed & Zouggar, Smail, 2022. "Tri-objective techno-economic sizing optimization of Off-grid and On-grid renewable energy systems using Electric system Cascade Extended analysis and system Advisor Model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    12. Adefarati, T. & Bansal, R.C., 2019. "Reliability, economic and environmental analysis of a microgrid system in the presence of renewable energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1089-1114.
    13. Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail & Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro & Stamford, Laurence & Azapagic, Adisa, 2020. "Design and environmental sustainability assessment of small-scale off-grid energy systems for remote rural communities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Alexander Lavrik & Yuri Zhukovskiy & Pavel Tcvetkov, 2021. "Optimizing the Size of Autonomous Hybrid Microgrids with Regard to Load Shifting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Gazda, Wiesław & Stanek, Wojciech, 2016. "Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 138-149.
    16. Mayer, Martin János & Szilágyi, Artúr & Gróf, Gyula, 2020. "Environmental and economic multi-objective optimization of a household level hybrid renewable energy system by genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Bahlawan, Hilal & Morini, Mirko & Spina, Pier Ruggero & Venturini, Mauro, 2021. "Inventory scaling, life cycle impact assessment and design optimization of distributed energy plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    18. Chen, Yuzhu & Hua, Huilian & Xu, Jinzhao & Yun, Zhonghua & Wang, Jun & Lund, Peter D., 2022. "Techno-economic cost assessment of a combined cooling heating and power system coupled to organic Rankine cycle with life cycle method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    19. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & He, Hongzhou & Jin, Hongguang & Chen, Zhijie & Zheng, Jieqing & Yang, Shaohui & Zhang, Xiaodong, 2020. "Using moderate carbon dioxide separation to improve the performance of solar-driven biogas reforming process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    20. Gao, Datong & Kwan, Trevor Hocksun & Hu, Maobin & Pei, Gang, 2022. "The energy, exergy, and techno-economic analysis of a solar seasonal residual energy utilization system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:253:y:2019:i:c:67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.