IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v215y2018icp778-791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid CO2 capture system for natural gas combined cycles with selective exhaust gas recirculation

Author

Listed:
  • Diego, Maria Elena
  • Bellas, Jean-Michel
  • Pourkashanian, Mohamed

Abstract

This work analyses the implementation of CO2 capture in natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants using a hybrid system integrated by an amine scrubbing plant and a CO2 selective membrane. In this configuration, the membrane unit operates at close to atmospheric pressure and it is used to selectively recycle CO2 back to the inlet of the compressor, therefore increasing the CO2 content of the flue gas entering the capture system. A novel integration between the amine capture plant and the selective membrane is analysed here, which aims at exploiting the benefits of both the parallel and series selective exhaust gas recirculation (S-EGR) existing options. The mass and energy balances performed on this system indicate that the new configuration generates a flue gas with a CO2-enhanced concentration of 18%vol., which leads to a decrease in the energy demand in the reboiler by 6% with respect to an amine scrubbing system coupled to a conventional NGCC plant without S-EGR. Moreover, a reduction of 77% is achieved in the gas flowrate fed to the absorber of the amine plant, thus significantly reducing its size and cost. The calculated net electrical efficiency of the plant is 50.3%, which is 0.5 net percentage points higher than that of a conventional NGCC with amine-based capture and slightly lower than that of a reference plant with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). These values are dependent on the pressure drop associated with the membrane system, which has a large influence on the energy balance of the plant. Therefore, higher efficiency improvements can be achieved if membrane module designs with reduced pressure drop are used. A techno-economic evaluation reveals that the cost of the membrane system has a strong effect on the capital costs of the plant and thus, on the cost of electricity and the cost of CO2 avoided. These values vary between $81.9 and $93.9 per MWh and $82.6 and $121.8 per tonne of CO2 avoided, respectively, for the S-EGR cases studied at a reference capacity factor of 0.85. A sensitivity analysis shows that it is necessary to reduce the costs of the reference hybrid S-EGR system in order to make it competitive against current benchmark options. Therefore, further ongoing development towards membrane units with high CO2 permeance, limited pressure drop and reduced costs is particularly interesting for the S-EGR system studied in this work. The obtained results also indicate the targeted values of these parameters that can make the cost of the S-EGR configuration to be below that of conventional systems with amine capture and EGR options for CO2 capture in NGCC power plants under different scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego, Maria Elena & Bellas, Jean-Michel & Pourkashanian, Mohamed, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid CO2 capture system for natural gas combined cycles with selective exhaust gas recirculation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 778-791.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:215:y:2018:i:c:p:778-791
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918301934
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Hailong & Ditaranto, Mario & Berstad, David, 2011. "Technologies for increasing CO2 concentration in exhaust gas from natural gas-fired power production with post-combustion, amine-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1124-1133.
    2. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lu, Xiaohua, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation from gas mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 237-243.
    3. Adams, T. & Mac Dowell, N., 2016. "Off-design point modelling of a 420MW CCGT power plant integrated with an amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture and compression process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 681-702.
    4. Hu, Yue & Ahn, Hyungwoong, 2017. "Process integration of a Calcium-looping process with a natural gas combined cycle power plant for CO2 capture and its improvement by exhaust gas recirculation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 480-488.
    5. Maria Elena Diego & Muhammad Akram & Jean‐Michel Bellas & Karen N. Finney & Mohamed Pourkashanian, 2017. "Making gas‐CCS a commercial reality: The challenges of scaling up," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(5), pages 778-801, October.
    6. Li, Hailong & Ditaranto, Mario & Yan, Jinyue, 2012. "Carbon capture with low energy penalty: Supplementary fired natural gas combined cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 164-169.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barakat, Elsayed & Jin, Tai & Wang, Gaofeng, 2023. "Performance analysis of selective exhaust gas recirculation integrated with fogging cooling system for gas turbine power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    2. Mohammed N. Khan & Schalk Cloete & Shahriar Amini, 2020. "Efficient Production of Clean Power and Hydrogen Through Synergistic Integration of Chemical Looping Combustion and Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Qasem, Naef A.A. & Ben-Mansour, Rached, 2018. "Adsorption breakthrough and cycling stability of carbon dioxide separation from CO2/N2/H2O mixture under ambient conditions using 13X and Mg-MOF-74," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1093-1107.
    4. Oko, Eni & Ramshaw, Colin & Wang, Meihong, 2018. "Study of intercooling for rotating packed bed absorbers in intensified solvent-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 302-316.
    5. Choi, Jaeuk & Cho, Habin & Yun, Seokwon & Jang, Mun-Gi & Oh, Se-Young & Binns, Michael & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2019. "Process design and optimization of MEA-based CO2 capture processes for non-power industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 971-980.
    6. Jiang, L. & Gonzalez-Diaz, A. & Ling-Chin, J. & Roskilly, A.P. & Smallbone, A.J., 2019. "Post-combustion CO2 capture from a natural gas combined cycle power plant using activated carbon adsorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Pereira, Luís M.C. & Llovell, Fèlix & Vega, Lourdes F., 2018. "Thermodynamic characterisation of aqueous alkanolamine and amine solutions for acid gas processing by transferable molecular models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 687-703.
    8. Shamair, Zufishan & Habib, Nitasha & Gilani, Mazhar Amjad & Khan, Asim Laeeq, 2020. "Theoretical and experimental investigation of CO2 separation from CH4 and N2 through supported ionic liquid membranes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    9. Yun, Seokwon & Lee, Sunghoon & Jang, Mun-Gi & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2021. "Techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture integrated coal-fired power plant with energetic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    10. Lee, Sunghoon & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2020. "Process-integrated design of a sub-ambient membrane process for CO2 removal from natural gas power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Nazir, Shareq Mohd & Cloete, Jan Hendrik & Cloete, Schalk & Amini, Shahriar, 2019. "Gas switching reforming (GSR) for power generation with CO2 capture: Process efficiency improvement studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 757-765.
    12. Julio, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François & González, Aldemar Martínez & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2023. "Exergy and economic analysis of the trade-off for design of post-combustion CO2 capture plant by chemical absorption with MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    13. Otitoju, Olajide & Oko, Eni & Wang, Meihong, 2021. "Technical and economic performance assessment of post-combustion carbon capture using piperazine for large scale natural gas combined cycle power plants through process simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    14. Roussanaly, S. & Aasen, A. & Anantharaman, R. & Danielsen, B. & Jakobsen, J. & Heme-De-Lacotte, L. & Neji, G. & Sødal, A. & Wahl, P.E. & Vrana, T.K. & Dreux, R., 2019. "Offshore power generation with carbon capture and storage to decarbonise mainland electricity and offshore oil and gas installations: A techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 478-494.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, L. & Gonzalez-Diaz, A. & Ling-Chin, J. & Roskilly, A.P. & Smallbone, A.J., 2019. "Post-combustion CO2 capture from a natural gas combined cycle power plant using activated carbon adsorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Vadim Fetisov & Adam M. Gonopolsky & Maria Yu. Zemenkova & Schipachev Andrey & Hadi Davardoost & Amir H. Mohammadi & Masoud Riazi, 2023. "On the Integration of CO 2 Capture Technologies for an Oil Refinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Maria Elena Diego & Muhammad Akram & Jean‐Michel Bellas & Karen N. Finney & Mohamed Pourkashanian, 2017. "Making gas‐CCS a commercial reality: The challenges of scaling up," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(5), pages 778-801, October.
    4. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena & Vaccarelli, Maura, 2017. "Application of an amine-based CO2 capture system in retrofitting combined gas-steam power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 808-826.
    5. Giuffrida, A. & Bonalumi, D. & Lozza, G., 2013. "Amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC systems with cold and hot gas clean-up," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 44-54.
    6. Wu, Xiao & Xi, Han & Ren, Yuning & Lee, Kwang Y., 2021. "Power-carbon coordinated control of BFG-fired CCGT power plant integrated with solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Hanak, Dawid P. & Powell, Dante & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plant with cryogenic oxygen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-203.
    8. Shen, Wenkai & Xing, Chang & Liu, Haiqing & Liu, Li & Hu, Qiming & Wu, Guohua & Yang, Yujia & Wu, Shaohua & Qiu, Penghua, 2022. "Exhaust gas recirculation effects on flame heat release rate distribution and dynamic characteristics in a micro gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    9. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2017. "Optimal design, operation and analytical criteria for determining optimal operating modes of a CCHP with fired HRSG, boiler, electric chiller and absorption chiller," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1052-1065.
    10. Wawrzyńczak, Dariusz & Panowski, Marcin & Majchrzak-Kucęba, Izabela, 2019. "Possibilities of CO2 purification coming from oxy-combustion for enhanced oil recovery and storage purposes by adsorption method on activated carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 787-796.
    11. Yang, Sheng & Zhang, Lu & Xie, Nan & Gu, Zhaohui & Liu, Zhiqiang, 2021. "Thermodynamic analysis of a semi-lean solution process for energy saving via rectisol wash technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Hou, Yu-Lin & Hung, Chen-I., 2012. "A study of influence of acoustic excitation on carbon dioxide capture by a droplet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 311-321.
    13. Julio, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François & González, Aldemar Martínez & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2023. "Exergy and economic analysis of the trade-off for design of post-combustion CO2 capture plant by chemical absorption with MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    14. Strojny, Magdalena & Gładysz, Paweł & Hanak, Dawid P. & Nowak, Wojciech, 2023. "Comparative analysis of CO2 capture technologies using amine absorption and calcium looping integrated with natural gas combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    15. Ali, Usman & Font-Palma, Carolina & Nikpey Somehsaraei, Homam & Mansouri Majoumerd, Mohammad & Akram, Muhammad & Finney, Karen N. & Best, Thom & Mohd Said, Nassya B. & Assadi, Mohsen & Pourkashanian, , 2017. "Benchmarking of a micro gas turbine model integrated with post-combustion CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 475-487.
    16. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    17. Claudia Cristina Sanchez Moore & Luiz Kulay, 2019. "Effect of the Implementation of Carbon Capture Systems on the Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance of the Brazilian Electricity Matrix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Li, Shuangjun & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhao, Ruikai & Yuan, Xiangzhou, 2021. "Thermodynamic carbon pump 2.0: Elucidating energy efficiency through the thermodynamic cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    19. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    20. Ma, Chunyan & Xie, Yujiao & Ji, Xiaoyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1269-1283.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:215:y:2018:i:c:p:778-791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.