IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i13p3443-d379943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Production of Clean Power and Hydrogen Through Synergistic Integration of Chemical Looping Combustion and Reforming

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed N. Khan

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Separation and Conversion Technology Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), 2400 Mol, Belgium)

  • Schalk Cloete

    (Process Technology Department, SINTEF Industry, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Shahriar Amini

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Process Technology Department, SINTEF Industry, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Chemical looping combustion (CLC) technology generates power while capturing CO 2 inherently with no direct energy penalty. However, previous studies have shown significant energy penalties due to low turbine inlet temperature (TIT) relative to a standard natural gas combined cycle plant. The low TIT is limited by the oxygen carrier material used in the CLC process. Therefore, in the current study, an additional combustor is included downstream of the CLC air reactor to raise the TIT. The efficient production of clean hydrogen for firing the added combustor is key to the success of this strategy. Therefore, the highly efficient membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming (MA-CLR) technology was selected. Five different integrations between CLC and MA-CLR were investigated, capitalizing on the steam in the CLC fuel reactor outlet stream to achieve highly efficient reforming in MA-CLR. This integration reduced the energy penalty as low as 3.6%-points for power production only (case 2) and 1.9%-points for power and hydrogen co-production (case 4)—a large improvement over the 8%-point energy penalty typically imposed by post-combustion CO 2 capture or CLC without added firing.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed N. Khan & Schalk Cloete & Shahriar Amini, 2020. "Efficient Production of Clean Power and Hydrogen Through Synergistic Integration of Chemical Looping Combustion and Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3443-:d:379943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3443/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Wu, Pengbin, 2018. "Tech-economic assessment of second-generation CCS: Chemical looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 915-927.
    2. Diego, Maria Elena & Bellas, Jean-Michel & Pourkashanian, Mohamed, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid CO2 capture system for natural gas combined cycles with selective exhaust gas recirculation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 778-791.
    3. Nazir, Shareq Mohd & Cloete, Jan Hendrik & Cloete, Schalk & Amini, Shahriar, 2019. "Gas switching reforming (GSR) for power generation with CO2 capture: Process efficiency improvement studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 757-765.
    4. Ogidiama, Oghare Victor & Abu-Zahra, Mohammad R.M. & Shamim, Tariq, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a poly-generation solar-assisted chemical looping combustion power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 724-735.
    5. Medrano, J.A. & Potdar, I. & Melendez, J. & Spallina, V. & Pacheco-Tanaka, D.A. & van Sint Annaland, M. & Gallucci, F., 2018. "The membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming concept for efficient H2 production with inherent CO2 capture: Experimental demonstration and model validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 75-86.
    6. Steven Jackson & Eivind Brodal, 2019. "Optimization of the Energy Consumption of a Carbon Capture and Sequestration Related Carbon Dioxide Compression Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Naqvi, Rehan & Wolf, Jens & Bolland, Olav, 2007. "Part-load analysis of a chemical looping combustion (CLC) combined cycle with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 360-370.
    8. Ishida, M. & Zheng, D. & Akehata, T., 1987. "Evaluation of a chemical-looping-combustion power-generation system by graphic exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 147-154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuguang Liu & Jiayi Wang & Yin Long, 2023. "Research into the Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Technological Innovation in China’s Natural Gas Industry from the Perspective of Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Ying-jie & Zhang, Yu-ke & Cui, Yang & Duan, Yuan-yuan & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guo-qiang & Mohamed, Usama & Shi, Li-juan & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2022. "Pinch combined with exergy analysis for heat exchange network and techno-economic evaluation of coal chemical looping combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Meng, William X. & Banerjee, Subhodeep & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2015. "Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1869-1877.
    4. Han, Lu & Bollas, George M., 2016. "Chemical-looping combustion in a reverse-flow fixed bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 669-681.
    5. Mishra, Navneet & Bhui, Barnali & Vairakannu, Prabu, 2019. "Comparative evaluation of performance of high and low ash coal fuelled chemical looping combustion integrated combined cycle power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 305-318.
    6. Shareq Mohd Nazir & Olav Bolland & Shahriar Amini, 2018. "Analysis of Combined Cycle Power Plants with Chemical Looping Reforming of Natural Gas and Pre-Combustion CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Nazir, Shareq Mohd & Cloete, Jan Hendrik & Cloete, Schalk & Amini, Shahriar, 2019. "Gas switching reforming (GSR) for power generation with CO2 capture: Process efficiency improvement studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 757-765.
    8. Basavaraja, R.J. & Jayanti, S., 2015. "Viability of fuel switching of a gas-fired power plant operating in chemical looping combustion mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 213-221.
    9. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Wu, Pengbin, 2018. "Tech-economic assessment of second-generation CCS: Chemical looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 915-927.
    10. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    11. Bartocci, Pietro & Abad, Alberto & Mattisson, Tobias & Cabello, Arturo & Loscertales, Margarita de las Obras & Negredo, Teresa Mendiara & Zampilli, Mauro & Taiana, Andrea & Serra, Angela & Arauzo, Inm, 2022. "Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) developed by coupling a Pressurised Chemical Looping combustor with a turbo expander: How to optimize plant efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Pavelka, Michal & Klika, Václav & Vágner, Petr & Maršík, František, 2015. "Generalization of exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 158-172.
    13. Oko, Eni & Ramshaw, Colin & Wang, Meihong, 2018. "Study of intercooling for rotating packed bed absorbers in intensified solvent-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 302-316.
    14. Fernández, J.R. & Abanades, J.C., 2014. "Conceptual design of a Ni-based chemical looping combustion process using fixed-beds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-319.
    15. Li, Yingjie & Zhao, Changsui & Chen, Huichao & Ren, Qiangqiang & Duan, Lunbo, 2011. "CO2 capture efficiency and energy requirement analysis of power plant using modified calcium-based sorbent looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1590-1598.
    16. Sanusi, Yinka S. & Mokheimer, Esmail M.A., 2019. "Thermo-economic optimization of hydrogen production in a membrane-SMR integrated to ITM-oxy-combustion plant using genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 164-176.
    17. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    18. Zhang, Yitao & Wang, Dawei & Pottimurthy, Yaswanth & Kong, Fanhe & Hsieh, Tien-Lin & Sakadjian, Bartev & Chung, Cheng & Park, Cody & Xu, Dikai & Bao, Jinhua & Velazquez-Vargas, Luis & Guo, Mengqing & , 2021. "Coal direct chemical looping process: 250 kW pilot-scale testing for power generation and carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    19. Medrano, J.A. & Potdar, I. & Melendez, J. & Spallina, V. & Pacheco-Tanaka, D.A. & van Sint Annaland, M. & Gallucci, F., 2018. "The membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming concept for efficient H2 production with inherent CO2 capture: Experimental demonstration and model validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 75-86.
    20. Bhavsar, Saurabh & Isenberg, Natalie & More, Amey & Veser, Götz, 2016. "Lanthana-doped ceria as active support for oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 236-247.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3443-:d:379943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.