IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v205y2017icp316-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sorption-enhanced water gas shift reaction for high-purity hydrogen production: Application of a Na-Mg double salt-based sorbent and the divided section packing concept

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Chan Hyun
  • Lee, Ki Bong

Abstract

Hydrogen is considered a promising environmentally benign energy carrier because it has high energy density and produces no pollutants when it is converted into other types of energy. The sorption-enhanced water gas shift (SE-WGS) reaction, where the catalytic WGS reaction and byproduct CO2 removal are carried out simultaneously in a single reactor, has received considerable attention as a novel method for high-purity hydrogen production. Since the high-purity hydrogen productivity of the SE-WGS reaction is largely dependent on the performance of the CO2 sorbent, the development of sorbents having high CO2 sorption capacity is crucial. Recently, a Na-Mg double salt-based sorbent has been considered for high-temperature CO2 capture since it has been reported to have a high sorption capacity and fast sorption kinetics. In this study, the SE-WGS reaction was experimentally demonstrated using a commercial catalyst and a Na-Mg double salt-based sorbent. However, the SE-WGS reaction with a one-body hybrid solid, a physical admixture of catalyst and sorbent, showed poor reactivity and reduced CO2 sorption uptake. As a result, a divided section packing concept was suggested as a solution. In the divided section packing method, the degree of mixing for the catalyst and sorbent in a column can be controlled by the number of sections. High-purity hydrogen (<10ppm CO) was produced directly from the SE-WGS reaction with divided section packing, and the hydrogen productivity was further improved when the reactor column was divided into more sections and packed with more sorbent.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Chan Hyun & Lee, Ki Bong, 2017. "Sorption-enhanced water gas shift reaction for high-purity hydrogen production: Application of a Na-Mg double salt-based sorbent and the divided section packing concept," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 316-322.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:205:y:2017:i:c:p:316-322
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917309947
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. LeValley, Trevor L. & Richard, Anthony R. & Fan, Maohong, 2015. "Development of catalysts for hydrogen production through the integration of steam reforming of methane and high temperature water gas shift," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 748-758.
    2. Maciel, Cristhiane Guimarães & Silva, Tatiana de Freitas & Assaf, Elisabete Moreira & Assaf, José Mansur, 2013. "Hydrogen production and purification from the water–gas shift reaction on CuO/CeO2–TiO2 catalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 52-59.
    3. Gradisher, Logan & Dutcher, Bryce & Fan, Maohong, 2015. "Catalytic hydrogen production from fossil fuels via the water gas shift reaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 335-349.
    4. Živković, Luka A. & Pohar, Andrej & Likozar, Blaž & Nikačević, Nikola M., 2016. "Kinetics and reactor modeling for CaO sorption-enhanced high-temperature water–gas shift (SE–WGS) reaction for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 844-855.
    5. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    6. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Di Michele, A. & Gallorini, F. & Petrillo, C. & Sacchetti, F., 2014. "Synthesis and test of sorbents based on calcium aluminates for SE-SR," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 81-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Chan Hyun & Kim, Suji & Yoon, Hyung Jin & Yoon, Chang Won & Lee, Ki Bong, 2021. "Water gas shift and sorption-enhanced water gas shift reactions using hydrothermally synthesized novel Cu–Mg–Al hydrotalcite-based catalysts for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Tabea J. Stadler & Philipp Barbig & Julian Kiehl & Rafael Schulz & Thomas Klövekorn & Peter Pfeifer, 2021. "Sorption-Enhanced Water-Gas Shift Reaction for Synthesis Gas Production from Pure CO: Investigation of Sorption Parameters and Reactor Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Zhu, Xuancan & Shi, Yixiang & Li, Shuang & Cai, Ningsheng, 2018. "Two-train elevated-temperature pressure swing adsorption for high-purity hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1061-1071.
    4. Ding, Jing & Yu, Chao & Lu, Jianfeng & Wei, Xiaolan & Wang, Weilong & Pan, Gechuanqi, 2020. "Enhanced CO2 adsorption of MgO with alkali metal nitrates and carbonates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Chen, Chia-Yang, 2020. "Water gas shift reaction for hydrogen production and carbon dioxide capture: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2023. "Green hydrogen production from decarbonized biomass gasification: An integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Gallorini, F., 2015. "SE-SR with sorbents based on calcium aluminates: Process optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 110-118.
    4. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Seo, Su Been & Kim, Hyung Woo & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Keel, Sang In & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison between air-fired and oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plants with ultra-supercritical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Andrea Porcu & Stefano Sollai & Davide Marotto & Mauro Mureddu & Francesca Ferrara & Alberto Pettinau, 2019. "Techno-Economic Analysis of a Small-Scale Biomass-to-Energy BFB Gasification-Based System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Anan Zhang & Hong Zhang & Meysam Qadrdan & Wei Yang & Xiaolong Jin & Jianzhong Wu, 2019. "Optimal Planning of Integrated Energy Systems for Offshore Oil Extraction and Processing Platforms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    8. Tazi, Nacef & Safaei, Fatemeh & Hnaien, Faicel, 2022. "Assessment of the levelized cost of energy using a stochastic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    9. Liu, Xianglei & Cheng, Bo & Zhu, Qibin & Gao, Ke & Sun, Nan & Tian, Cheng & Wang, Jiaqi & Zheng, Hangbin & Wang, Xinrui & Dang, Chunzhuo & Xuan, Yimin, 2022. "Highly efficient solar-driven CO2 reforming of methane via concave foam reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    10. Prakash, Vrishab & Ghosh, Sajal & Kanjilal, Kakali, 2020. "Costs of avoided carbon emission from thermal and renewable sources of power in India and policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Chen, Guanyi & Tao, Junyu & Liu, Caixia & Yan, Beibei & Li, Wanqing & Li, Xiangping, 2017. "Hydrogen production via acetic acid steam reforming: A critical review on catalysts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1091-1098.
    12. Wang, Shuofeng & Ji, Changwei & Zhang, Bo & Liu, Xiaolong, 2014. "Lean burn performance of a hydrogen-blended gasoline engine at the wide open throttle condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 43-50.
    13. Cormos, Calin-Cristian & Dinca, Cristian, 2021. "Techno-economic and environmental implications of decarbonization process applied for Romanian fossil-based power generation sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Xin, Yanbin & Sun, Bing & Zhu, Xiaomei & Yan, Zhiyu & Zhao, Xiaotong & Sun, Xiaohang, 2017. "Hydrogen production from ethanol decomposition by pulsed discharge with needle-net configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 126-133.
    15. Zhu, Xuancan & Shi, Yixiang & Cai, Ningsheng, 2016. "Integrated gasification combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture by elevated temperature pressure swing adsorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 196-208.
    16. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & Sharma, Manish & Zeaiter, Joseph & Abbas, Ali, 2016. "Model-based analysis of CO2 revalorization for di-methyl ether synthesis driven by solar catalytic reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 863-878.
    17. Thushara, De Silva M. & Hornberger, George M. & Baroud, Hiba, 2019. "Decision analysis to support the choice of a future power generation pathway for Sri Lanka," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 680-697.
    18. Anufriev, I.S., 2021. "Review of water/steam addition in liquid-fuel combustion systems for NOx reduction: Waste-to-energy trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. He, Rui-fang & Zhong, Mei-rui & Huang, Jian-bai, 2021. "The dynamic effects of renewable-energy and fossil-fuel technological progress on metal consumption in the electric power industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Zhao, Ying-jie & Zhang, Yu-ke & Cui, Yang & Duan, Yuan-yuan & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guo-qiang & Mohamed, Usama & Shi, Li-juan & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2022. "Pinch combined with exergy analysis for heat exchange network and techno-economic evaluation of coal chemical looping combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:205:y:2017:i:c:p:316-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.