IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v195y2017icp905-921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind farm hub height optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza
  • Archer, Cristina L.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the effect of hub height optimization on the Annual Energy Production (AEP) of a wind farm. The only optimization variable is the hub height of each wind turbine and all other characteristics of the wind farm, including base location, rotor diameter (D), and total number of wind turbines, remain unchanged. The first case study consisted of two wind turbines aligned with the wind direction, with the hub height of the upstream turbine fixed and that of the downstream turbine varying. Two competing effects were identified. On one hand, lowering the hub height of the downwind turbine exposes a larger fraction of the downwind rotor to the undisturbed wind and therefore increases its power production. On the other hand, turbines with lower hub heights experience lower wind speeds due to shear. The balance between these two effects is complicated by surface roughness and spacing between turbines. The maximum benefits are found offshore, with tight axial spacing (⩽5D). To put into perspective the effectiveness of using multiple hub heights in a realistic setting, the second case compared two 20-turbine wind farms with the same horizontal layout, turbine type, and wind direction, but one with all turbines installed at the same hub height (80m) and the second with alternating rows of tall (100m) and short (57.5m) wind turbines. The vertically staggered configuration was found to produce approximately 5.4% more power. Lastly, a real 48-turbine wind farm (Lillgrund in Sweden) was optimized under all 360 wind directions and wind speeds ranging from the cut-in to the cut-out using a greedy search algorithm. The optimal configuration presented a non-intuitive and balanced mix of 26 tall and 22 short turbines. Although the entire range from a minimum to a maximum predefined hub height was searched to determine the optimal hub height for each wind turbine, the optimization algorithm ended up with an optimal layout in which the hub height of each turbine was equal to either the minimum hub height or the maximum hub height and no value in between was assigned to any of the turbines. The AEP of the optimized wind farm with multiple hub heights was approximately 2% (10GWh) higher than that of the wind farm with a single hub height. The PARK model was used in this study to calculate wake losses and to perform the optimization. To validate its results, Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) of the flow around the turbines, represented as actuator lines, were conducted at fine spatial and temporal resolutions. The LES results confirmed that optimizing hub heights is beneficial and indicated that the net gains were actually higher (by up to a factor of two) than those calculated with PARK.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Archer, Cristina L., 2017. "Wind farm hub height optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 905-921.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:195:y:2017:i:c:p:905-921
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917303306
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakoor, Rabia & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Raheem, Abdur & Wu, Yuan-Kang, 2016. "Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen׳s model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1048-1059.
    2. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2014. "Study on offshore wind power potential and wind farm optimization in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 519-531.
    3. Chen, Le & Harding, Chris & Sharma, Anupam & MacDonald, Erin, 2016. "Modeling noise and lease soft costs improves wind farm design and cost-of-energy predictions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 849-859.
    4. van Haaren, Rob & Fthenakis, Vasilis, 2011. "GIS-based wind farm site selection using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SMCA): Evaluating the case for New York State," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(7), pages 3332-3340, September.
    5. Guirguis, David & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2016. "Toward efficient optimization of wind farm layouts: Utilizing exact gradient information," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 110-123.
    6. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2016. "Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 192-200.
    7. Park, Jinkyoo & Law, Kincho H., 2015. "Layout optimization for maximizing wind farm power production using sequential convex programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 320-334.
    8. Bai, Chi-Jeng & Wang, Wei-Cheng, 2016. "Review of computational and experimental approaches to analysis of aerodynamic performance in horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 506-519.
    9. Fleming, Paul A. & Gebraad, Pieter M.O. & Lee, Sang & van Wingerden, Jan-Willem & Johnson, Kathryn & Churchfield, Matt & Michalakes, John & Spalart, Philippe & Moriarty, Patrick, 2014. "Evaluating techniques for redirecting turbine wakes using SOWFA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 211-218.
    10. Wang, Longyan & Tan, Andy & Gu, Yuantong, 2016. "A novel control strategy approach to optimally design a wind farm layout," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 10-21.
    11. Wang, Lin & Liu, Xiongwei & Kolios, Athanasios, 2016. "State of the art in the aeroelasticity of wind turbine blades: Aeroelastic modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 195-210.
    12. Chen, K. & Song, M.X. & Zhang, X. & Wang, S.F., 2016. "Wind turbine layout optimization with multiple hub height wind turbines using greedy algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 676-686.
    13. Rodrigues, S. & Bauer, P. & Bosman, Peter A.N., 2016. "Multi-objective optimization of wind farm layouts – Complexity, constraint handling and scalability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 587-609.
    14. DuPont, Bryony & Cagan, Jonathan & Moriarty, Patrick, 2016. "An advanced modeling system for optimization of wind farm layout and wind turbine sizing using a multi-level extended pattern search algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 802-814.
    15. Gao, Richie & Gao, Zhiwei, 2016. "Pitch control for wind turbine systems using optimization, estimation and compensation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 501-515.
    16. Njiri, Jackson G. & Söffker, Dirk, 2016. "State-of-the-art in wind turbine control: Trends and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 377-393.
    17. Kuo, Jim Y.J. & Romero, David A. & Beck, J. Christopher & Amon, Cristina H., 2016. "Wind farm layout optimization on complex terrains – Integrating a CFD wake model with mixed-integer programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 404-414.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azlan, F. & Kurnia, J.C. & Tan, B.T. & Ismadi, M.-Z., 2021. "Review on optimisation methods of wind farm array under three classical wind condition problems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Yang, Kyoungboo & Kwak, Gyeongil & Cho, Kyungho & Huh, Jongchul, 2019. "Wind farm layout optimization for wake effect uniformity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 983-995.
    3. Guirguis, David & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2017. "Gradient-based multidisciplinary design of wind farms with continuous-variable formulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 279-291.
    4. Brogna, Roberto & Feng, Ju & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær & Shen, Wen Zhong & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2020. "A new wake model and comparison of eight algorithms for layout optimization of wind farms in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Cuadra, L. & Ocampo-Estrella, I. & Alexandre, E. & Salcedo-Sanz, S., 2019. "A study on the impact of easements in the deployment of wind farms near airport facilities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 566-588.
    6. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    7. Kyoungboo Yang & Kyungho Cho, 2019. "Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Wind Farm Layout Optimization: A Benchmark Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing & Gao, Xiaoxia, 2019. "Investigation into spacing restriction and layout optimization of wind farm with multiple types of wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 637-650.
    9. Tao, Siyu & Xu, Qingshan & Feijóo, Andrés & Zheng, Gang & Zhou, Jiemin, 2020. "Nonuniform wind farm layout optimization: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    10. Wang, Longyan & Cholette, Michael E. & Zhou, Yunkai & Yuan, Jianping & Tan, Andy C.C. & Gu, Yuantong, 2018. "Effectiveness of optimized control strategy and different hub height turbines on a real wind farm optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 819-829.
    11. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Gualous, Hamid, 2016. "A semi-analytic method to optimize tidal farm layouts – Application to the Alderney Race (Raz Blanchard), France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1168-1180.
    12. Parada, Leandro & Herrera, Carlos & Flores, Paulo & Parada, Victor, 2018. "Assessing the energy benefit of using a wind turbine micro-siting model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 591-601.
    13. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Gualous, Hamid, 2017. "Assessing the effectiveness of a global optimum strategy within a tidal farm for power maximization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 653-666.
    14. Wędzik, Andrzej & Siewierski, Tomasz & Szypowski, Michał, 2016. "A new method for simultaneous optimizing of wind farm’s network layout and cable cross-sections by MILP optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 525-538.
    15. Cazzaro, Davide & Trivella, Alessio & Corman, Francesco & Pisinger, David, 2022. "Multi-scale optimization of the design of offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    16. Dhoot, Aditya & Antonini, Enrico G.A. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2021. "Optimizing wind farms layouts for maximum energy production using probabilistic inference: Benchmarking reveals superior computational efficiency and scalability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    17. Chen, Jian & Zhang, Yu & Xu, Zhongyun & Li, Chun, 2023. "Flow characteristics analysis and power comparison for two novel types of vertically staggered wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    18. Pollini, Nicolò, 2022. "Topology optimization of wind farm layouts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1015-1027.
    19. Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Ying & Liu, Yongqian & Li, Qi, 2019. "A two-dimensional model based on the expansion of physical wake boundary for wind-turbine wakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 975-984.
    20. Kyoungboo Yang, 2020. "Determining an Appropriate Parameter of Analytical Wake Models for Energy Capture and Layout Optimization on Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:195:y:2017:i:c:p:905-921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.