IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v193y2017icp381-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cost-effective approach to reducing carbon deposition and resulting deactivation of oxygen carriers for improvement of energy efficiency and CO2 capture during methane chemical-looping combustion

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Xin
  • Wang, Xingjun
  • Fan, Maohong
  • Wang, Yonggang
  • Adidharma, Hertanto
  • Gasem, Khaled A.M.
  • Radosz, Maciej

Abstract

The objective of this research is to investigate the effect of steam on reducing carbon deposition during CH4 chemical looping combustion (CLC) on a fixed bed reactor. Steam proved to be significantly effective not only for the fuel utilization efficiency of CLC but also for the stability of the oxygen carrier (OC). The evaluation tests were performed with CuO/γ-Al2O3 OCs prepared with three different methods. The results showed that OC prepared using co-precipitation method performed the best with the highest reactivity for CH4 combustion at low temperature (700°C) compared to that prepared using mechanical mixture and impregnation methods. It was also found that the carbon deposition was the main reason for the low combustion efficiency and the deactivation of OCs in redox cycles. For OCs at 800°C, after 10 cycles without steam, 25–44% CO2 selectivity reductions were observed, accompanied by Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore volume decreases of 31–47%. With the steam introduction, the CO2 selectivity consistently achieved ∼100% in 10-cycle CLC, and the pore volumes of OCs decreased by only 11–22%, which was mostly attributed to the carbon-steam gasification reaction. The OCs for CH4 CLC with and without steam were characterized by using different methods, including surface area and pore analysis, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), H2 temperature programming reduction (TPR), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results demonstrated that steam could easily gasify the carbon deposition, greatly intensify the redox degree of OCs at 800°C, and strengthen the redistribution of Cu on the surface of Al2O3, contributing to the fine and uniform distribution of CuO. Therefore, steam can be successfully used for considerable enhancement of the overall performance of CH4 CLC.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Xin & Wang, Xingjun & Fan, Maohong & Wang, Yonggang & Adidharma, Hertanto & Gasem, Khaled A.M. & Radosz, Maciej, 2017. "A cost-effective approach to reducing carbon deposition and resulting deactivation of oxygen carriers for improvement of energy efficiency and CO2 capture during methane chemical-looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 381-392.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:193:y:2017:i:c:p:381-392
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917301939
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ku, Young & Wu, Hsuan-Chih & Chiu, Ping-Chin & Tseng, Yao-Hsuan & Kuo, Yu-Lin, 2014. "Methane combustion by moving bed fuel reactor with Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carriers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1909-1915.
    2. Han, Lu & Bollas, George M., 2016. "Dynamic optimization of fixed bed chemical-looping combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1107-1119.
    3. Breault, Ronald W. & Monazam, Esmail R. & Carpenter, Jared T., 2015. "Analysis of hematite re-oxidation in the chemical looping process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 174-182.
    4. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Min & Chen, Shiyi & Soomro, Ahsanullah & Hu, Jun & Sun, Zhao & Ma, Shiwei & Xiang, Wenguo, 2018. "Effects of supports on reduction activity and carbon deposition of iron oxide for methane chemical looping hydrogen generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 912-921.
    2. Liu, Chenlong & Chen, Dong & Cao, Yongan & zhang, Tianxi & Mao, Yangyang & Wang, Wenju & Wang, Zhigang & Kawi, Sibudjing, 2020. "Catalytic steam reforming of in-situ tar from rice husk over MCM-41 supported LaNiO3 to produce hydrogen rich syngas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 408-418.
    3. Huang, Xin & Fan, Maohong & Wang, Xingjun & Wang, Yonggang & Argyle, Morris D. & Zhu, Yufei, 2018. "A cost-effective approach to realization of the efficient methane chemical-looping combustion by using coal fly ash as a support for oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 393-402.
    4. Chandran, Radhakrishnan & Kaliaperumal, Rajendran & Balakrishnan, Saravanakumar & Britten, Allen J. & MacInnis, Judy & Mkandawire, Martin, 2020. "Characteristics of bio-oil from continuous fast pyrolysis of Prosopis juliflora," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Bayham & Ronald Breault & Justin Weber, 2017. "Chemical Looping Combustion of Hematite Ore with Methane and Steam in a Fluidized Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Martin Haaf & Peter Ohlemüller & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of alternative fuels in second-generation carbon capture and storage processes," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 149-164, February.
    3. Li, Wei & Jia, Zhijie & Zhang, Hongzhi, 2017. "The impact of electric vehicles and CCS in the context of emission trading scheme in China: A CGE-based analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 800-816.
    4. Zhu, Min & Chen, Shiyi & Soomro, Ahsanullah & Hu, Jun & Sun, Zhao & Ma, Shiwei & Xiang, Wenguo, 2018. "Effects of supports on reduction activity and carbon deposition of iron oxide for methane chemical looping hydrogen generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 912-921.
    5. Perejón, Antonio & Romeo, Luis M. & Lara, Yolanda & Lisbona, Pilar & Martínez, Ana & Valverde, Jose Manuel, 2016. "The Calcium-Looping technology for CO2 capture: On the important roles of energy integration and sorbent behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 787-807.
    6. Chein, Rei-Yu & Lu, Cheng-Yang & Chen, Wei-Hsin, 2022. "Syngas production via chemical looping reforming using methane-based feed and NiO/Al2O3 oxygen carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    7. Antonio Coppola & Fabrizio Scala, 2020. "A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO 2 and SO 2 from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-9, May.
    8. Abdul Rahim Shaikh & Qinhui Wang & Long Han & Yi Feng & Zohaib Sharif & Zhixin Li & Jianmeng Cen & Sunel Kumar, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen and Electricity Production by Biomass Calcium Looping Gasification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Chenglin Su & Lunbo Duan & Edward John Anthony, 2018. "CO2 capture and attrition performance of competitive eco‐friendly calcium‐based pellets in fluidized bed," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 1124-1133, December.
    10. Yan, Linbo & Wang, Ziqi & Cao, Yang & He, Boshu, 2020. "Comparative evaluation of two biomass direct-fired power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1188-1198.
    11. Sreenivasulu, B. & Gayatri, D.V. & Sreedhar, I. & Raghavan, K.V., 2015. "A journey into the process and engineering aspects of carbon capture technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1324-1350.
    12. Miller, Duane D. & Siriwardane, Ranjani & Poston, James, 2015. "Fluidized-bed and fixed-bed reactor testing of methane chemical looping combustion with MgO-promoted hematite," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 111-121.
    13. Nandy, Anirban & Loha, Chanchal & Gu, Sai & Sarkar, Pinaki & Karmakar, Malay K. & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2016. "Present status and overview of Chemical Looping Combustion technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 597-619.
    14. Nakano, Anna & Nakano, Jinichiro & Bennett, James, 2020. "Real-time high temperature investigations of an individual natural hematite ore particle for chemical looping oxygen exchange," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    15. Lombardi, L. & Carnevale, E.A., 2016. "Analysis of an innovative process for landfill gas quality improvement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1107-1117.
    16. Fan, Jing-Li & Wei, Shijie & Yang, Lin & Wang, Hang & Zhong, Ping & Zhang, Xian, 2019. "Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 143-155.
    17. Shi, Bin & Wu, Erdorng & Wu, Wei, 2017. "Novel design of chemical looping air separation process for generating electricity and oxygen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 449-457.
    18. Wu, Yunna & Xiao, Xinli & Song, Zongyun, 2017. "Competitiveness analysis of coal industry in China: A diamond model study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 39-53.
    19. Chen, Qindong & Hu, Song & Xu, Qiyong & Su, Sheng & Wang, Yi & Xu, Kai & He, Limo & Xiang, Jun, 2021. "Steam synergic effect on oxygen carrier performance and WGS promotion ability of iron-oxides," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    20. Wu, Ying & Chen, Xiaoping & Ma, Jiliang & Wu, Ye & Liu, Daoyin & Xie, Weiyi, 2020. "System integration optimization for coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture by Na2CO3 dry sorbents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:193:y:2017:i:c:p:381-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.