IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v189y2017icp433-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic analysis of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Yuan
  • Bhattacharyya, Debangsu

Abstract

In this paper, techno-economic analysis of direct coal biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants is performed in Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (APEA) using high fidelity process models developed in Aspen Plus for four different configurations of direct CBTL plants. Results from the economic model are validated with the data in the open literature, if available. Sensitivity studies are conducted to evaluate the impacts of key investment parameters, design parameters, and potential government-subsidized credits on the main economic measures including net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), break-even oil price (BEOP) and equivalent oil price (EOP). Using the North America 2015 pricing basis in APEA, this study shows that the BEOP of direct CBTL processes ranges from $56.9/bbl to $80.5/bbl for large scale (50,000bbl/day) plants and from $77.3/bbl to $97.5/bbl for small scale (10,000bbl/day) plants. It is observed that integrating a carbon capture and storage (CCS) unit to the direct CBTL process can increase the BEOP by about 10%, while utilization of the cheap and abundant shale gas (especially in the continental US) can make the direct liquefaction processes considerably more attractive than the indirect CBTL processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 433-448.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:189:y:2017:i:c:p:433-448
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916318529
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srirangan, Kajan & Akawi, Lamees & Moo-Young, Murray & Chou, C. Perry, 2012. "Towards sustainable production of clean energy carriers from biomass resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 172-186.
    2. Aime Hilaire Tchapda & Sarma V. Pisupati, 2014. "A Review of Thermal Co-Conversion of Coal and Biomass/Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-51, February.
    3. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    4. Kieffer, Matthew & Brown, Tristan & Brown, Robert C., 2016. "Flex fuel polygeneration: Integrating renewable natural gas into Fischer–Tropsch synthesis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 208-218.
    5. Kathe, Mandar V. & Empfield, Abbey & Na, Jing & Blair, Elena & Fan, Liang-Shih, 2016. "Hydrogen production from natural gas using an iron-based chemical looping technology: Thermodynamic simulations and process system analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 183-201.
    6. Hengfu Shui & Zhenyi Cai & Chunbao Xu, 2010. "Recent Advances in Direct Coal Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Shui, Hengfu & Shan, Chuanjun & Cai, Zhengyi & Wang, Zhicai & Lei, Zhiping & Ren, Shibiao & Pan, Chunxiu & Li, Haiping, 2011. "Co-liquefaction behavior of a sub-bituminous coal and sawdust," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6645-6650.
    8. Ken K. Robinson, 2009. "Reaction Engineering of Direct Coal Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-31, October.
    9. Martínez, I. & Romano, M.C. & Fernández, J.R. & Chiesa, P. & Murillo, R. & Abanades, J.C., 2014. "Process design of a hydrogen production plant from natural gas with CO2 capture based on a novel Ca/Cu chemical loop," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 192-208.
    10. Schakel, Wouter & Meerman, Hans & Talaei, Alireza & Ramírez, Andrea & Faaij, André, 2014. "Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing plants with carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 441-467.
    11. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2016. "Process modeling of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1616-1632.
    12. Nian, Victor, 2016. "The carbon neutrality of electricity generation from woody biomass and coal, a critical comparative evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1069-1080.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mevawala, Chirag & Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2019. "Techno-economic optimization of shale gas to dimethyl ether production processes via direct and indirect synthesis routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 119-134.
    2. Chen, Jianjun & Yang, Siyu & Qian, Yu, 2019. "A novel path for carbon-rich resource utilization with lower emission and higher efficiency: An integrated process of coal gasification and coking to methanol production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 304-318.
    3. Jiang, Yuan & Liese, Eric & Zitney, Stephen E. & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2018. "Optimal design of microtube recuperators for an indirect supercritical carbon dioxide recompression closed Brayton cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 634-648.
    4. Ding, Bingqing & Makowski, Marek & Nahorski, Zbigniew & Ren, Hongtao & Ma, Tieju, 2022. "Optimizing the technology pathway of China's liquid fuel production considering uncertain oil prices: A robust programming model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Liu, Tianyu & Wen, Chang & Li, Changkang & Yan, Kai & Li, Rui & Jing, Zhenqi & Zhang, Bohan & Ma, Jingjing, 2022. "Integrated water washing and carbonization pretreatment of typical herbaceous and woody biomass: Fuel properties, combustion behaviors, and techno-economic assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 218-233.
    6. Wu, Handong & Gao, Lin & Jin, Hongguang & Li, Sheng, 2017. "Low-energy-penalty principles of CO2 capture in polygeneration systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 571-581.
    7. Jiang, Yuan & Liese, Eric & Zitney, Stephen E. & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2018. "Design and dynamic modeling of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1019-1032.
    8. Carvalho, Lara & Lundgren, Joakim & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Wolf, Jens & Furusjö, Erik, 2018. "Methanol production via black liquor co-gasification with expanded raw material base – Techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 570-584.
    9. Liu, Weiguo & Wang, Jingxin & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu & Jiang, Yuan & DeVallance, David, 2017. "Economic and environmental analyses of coal and biomass to liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 76-86.
    10. Yan, Linbo & Wang, Ziqi & Cao, Yang & He, Boshu, 2020. "Comparative evaluation of two biomass direct-fired power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1188-1198.
    11. Huang, Yi & Yi, Qun & Wei, Guo-qiang & Kang, Jing-xian & Li, Wen-ying & Feng, Jie & Xie, Ke-chang, 2018. "Energy use, greenhouse gases emission and cost effectiveness of an integrated high– and low–temperature Fisher–Tropsch synthesis plant from a lifecycle viewpoint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1009-1019.
    12. Dasireddy, Venkata D.B.C. & Likozar, Blaž, 2022. "Photocatalytic CO2 reduction to methanol over bismuth promoted BaTiO3 perovskite nanoparticle catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 885-895.
    13. Kler, Aleksandr M. & Tyurina, Elina A. & Mednikov, Aleksandr S., 2018. "A plant for methanol and electricity production: Technical-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 890-899.
    14. Mevawala, Chirag & Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Plant-wide modeling and analysis of the shale gas to dimethyl ether (DME) process via direct and indirect synthesis routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 163-180.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2016. "Process modeling of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1616-1632.
    2. Esteban-Díez, G. & Gil, María V. & Pevida, C. & Chen, D. & Rubiera, F., 2016. "Effect of operating conditions on the sorption enhanced steam reforming of blends of acetic acid and acetone as bio-oil model compounds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 579-590.
    3. Moinuddin Ghauri & Khurram Shahzad & Abrar Inayat & Zulfiqar Ali & Keith R. Cliffe, 2016. "High Pressure Oxydesulphurisation of Coal Using KMnO 4 —Effect of Coal Slurry Concentration, pH and Alkali," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Zhang, Yitao & Wang, Dawei & Pottimurthy, Yaswanth & Kong, Fanhe & Hsieh, Tien-Lin & Sakadjian, Bartev & Chung, Cheng & Park, Cody & Xu, Dikai & Bao, Jinhua & Velazquez-Vargas, Luis & Guo, Mengqing & , 2021. "Coal direct chemical looping process: 250 kW pilot-scale testing for power generation and carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    5. Shah, Vedant & Cheng, Zhuo & Baser, Deven S. & Fan, Jonathan A. & Fan, Liang-Shih, 2021. "Highly Selective Production of Syngas from Chemical Looping Reforming of Methane with CO2 Utilization on MgO-supported Calcium Ferrite Redox Materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    6. Arnob Das & Susmita Datta Peu, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advancements in Thermochemical Processes for Clean Hydrogen Production to Decarbonize the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-42, September.
    7. Nadgouda, Sourabh G. & Guo, Mengqing & Tong, Andrew & Fan, L.-S., 2019. "High purity syngas and hydrogen coproduction using copper-iron oxygen carriers in chemical looping reforming process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1415-1426.
    8. Moinuddin Ghauri & Abrar Inayat & Muhammad Tariq Bashir & Salmiaton B. Ali & Keith R. Cliffe, 2013. "High Pressure Oxydesulphurisation of Coal—A Parametric Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Abdul Rahim Shaikh & Qinhui Wang & Long Han & Yi Feng & Zohaib Sharif & Zhixin Li & Jianmeng Cen & Sunel Kumar, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen and Electricity Production by Biomass Calcium Looping Gasification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Liu, Xiangyu & Hong, Hui & Zhang, Hao & Cao, Yali & Qu, Wanjun & Jin, Hongguang, 2020. "Solar methanol by hybridizing natural gas chemical looping reforming with solar heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Hoseinzade, Leila & Adams, Thomas A., 2019. "Techno-economic and environmental analyses of a novel, sustainable process for production of liquid fuels using helium heat transfer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 850-866.
    12. Ail, Snehesh Shivananda & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Biomass to liquid transportation fuel via Fischer Tropsch synthesis – Technology review and current scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 267-286.
    13. Oladejo, Jumoke M. & Adegbite, Stephen & Pang, Cheng Heng & Liu, Hao & Parvez, Ashak M. & Wu, Tao, 2017. "A novel index for the study of synergistic effects during the co-processing of coal and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 215-225.
    14. Siriwardane, Ranjani & Riley, Jarrett & Atallah, Chris, 2022. "CO2 utilization potential of a novel calcium ferrite based looping process fueled with coal: Experimental evaluation of various coal feedstocks and thermodynamic integrated process analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    15. Liu, Xiangyu & Zhang, Hao & Hong, Hui & Jin, Hongguang, 2020. "Experimental study on honeycomb reactor using methane via chemical looping cycle for solar syngas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    16. Surywanshi, Gajanan Dattarao & Patnaikuni, Venkata Suresh & Vooradi, Ramsagar & Anne, Sarath Babu, 2021. "4-E and life cycle analyses of a supercritical coal direct chemical looping combustion power plant with hydrogen and power co-generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Sui, Jiyuan & Chen, Zhennan & Wang, Chen & Wang, Yueyang & Liu, Jianhong & Li, Wenjia, 2020. "Efficient hydrogen production from solar energy and fossil fuel via water-electrolysis and methane-steam-reforming hybridization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    18. Xiang, Dong & Huang, Weiqing & Huang, Peng, 2018. "A novel coke-oven gas-to-natural gas and hydrogen process by integrating chemical looping hydrogen with methanation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1024-1033.
    19. Oladejo, Jumoke & Adegbite, Stephen & Gao, Xiang & Liu, Hao & Wu, Tao, 2018. "Catalytic and non-catalytic synergistic effects and their individual contributions to improved combustion performance of coal/biomass blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 334-345.
    20. Xiang, Dong & Zhou, Yunpeng, 2018. "Concept design and techno-economic performance of hydrogen and ammonia co-generation by coke-oven gas-pressure swing adsorption integrated with chemical looping hydrogen process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1024-1034.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:189:y:2017:i:c:p:433-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.