IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v320y2025ics0378377425005645.html

Evaluation and comparison of OpenET models for estimating soil water depletion of irrigated alfalfa in Arizona

Author

Listed:
  • Attalah, Said
  • Elsadek, Elsayed Ahmed
  • Waller, Peter
  • Hunsaker, Douglas J.
  • Thorp, Kelly R.
  • Bautista, Eduardo
  • Williams, Clinton
  • Wall, Gerard
  • Orr, Ethan
  • Elshikha, Diaa Eldin M.

Abstract

Growers in arid regions often estimate soil water depletion (Dr) of the root zone in making irrigation scheduling decisions. While growers might use soil water sensors, actual Dr in fields may be only vaguely assessed. In this study, daily crop evapotranspiration (ETsat) data from the six OpenET satellite-based models (ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop) and the OpenET ensemble were incorporated into a soil water balance (SWB) to estimate Dr (Dr sat) for alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) within a 46-ha, center-pivot field in Buckeye, Arizona. A daily SWB for each model input the average ETsat data acquired at four locations for both 30-m and 90-m pixel sizes, assuming an alfalfa root-zone of 1.8-m. Net irrigation (In) inputs were based on gross irrigation amounts, modified for evaporation losses using weather data from the AZMET station in Buckeye. Dr sat values were compared to the average observed root-zone Dr (Dr obs), as determined at the four locations by neutron moisture meter measurements on 21 dates between 05/23/2023 and 12/11/2023. Cumulative values were 841 mm for In plus effective precipitation, 776 mm (ALEXI/DisALEXI) to 1130 mm (SSEBop) for ETsat, and 816 mm of ET obtained by a seasonal SWB (ETswb) based on the average change in Dr obs (ΔDr obs) from first to last measurements. Average Dr obs fluctuated between 59 and 133 mm, and ΔDr obs was −25.0 ± 42.0 mm. Model variations in ETsat resulted in different estimates of Dr sat and agreements, where mean bias error (MBE) ranged from ≈ -35 % (PT-JPL) to 195 % (SSEBop). Despite notable uncertainties in the SWB parameters and observed data, the SWB based on both the ensemble and ALEXI/DisALEXI ETsat capably tracked Dr obs for most of the observations, excluding those made from late-July to mid-August. However, the best overall agreement was with the ensemble data, where differences between cumulative ETsat and ETswb and ΔDr sat and ΔDr obs were small, and MBE for Dr sat was less than 9 % and 15 % at 30-m and 90-m pixels, respectively. Findings suggest that using the single value OpenET ensemble daily ET could be a reliable source for estimating the Dr in arid climate alfalfa fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Attalah, Said & Elsadek, Elsayed Ahmed & Waller, Peter & Hunsaker, Douglas J. & Thorp, Kelly R. & Bautista, Eduardo & Williams, Clinton & Wall, Gerard & Orr, Ethan & Elshikha, Diaa Eldin M., 2025. "Evaluation and comparison of OpenET models for estimating soil water depletion of irrigated alfalfa in Arizona," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:320:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425005645
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005645
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Melton, F. & Johnson, L. & Wang, T. & López-Urrea, R. & Cancela, J.J. & Allen, R.G., 2020. "Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Background and validation using ground and remote sensing data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Aminpour, Younes & Dehghan, Darya & Playán, Enrique & Maroufpoor, Eisa, 2023. "Estimation of wind drift and evaporation losses of sprinkler irrigation systems using dimensional analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    3. Sandhu, Rupinder & Irmak, Suat, 2019. "Performance of AquaCrop model in simulating maize growth, yield, and evapotranspiration under rainfed, limited and full irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Aliasghar Montazar & Daniel Putnam, 2023. "Evapotranspiration and Yield Impact Tools for More Water-Use Efficient Alfalfa Production in Desert Environments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Barker, J. Burdette & Franz, Trenton E. & Heeren, Derek M. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Luck, Joe D., 2017. "Soil water content monitoring for irrigation management: A geostatistical analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 36-49.
    6. Elsayed Ahmed Elsadek & Mosaad Ali Hussein Ali & Clinton Williams & Kelly R. Thorp & Diaa Eldin M. Elshikha, 2025. "A Novel Framework for Predicting Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Using Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-29, September.
    7. Allen, Richard G. & Pereira, Luis S. & Howell, Terry A. & Jensen, Marvin E., 2011. "Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 899-920, April.
    8. Frisvold, George B., 2024. "Arizona Policy Responses to Water Shortage: Can They Have an Impact?," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(3), November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darouich, Hanaa & Karfoul, Razan & Ramos, Tiago B. & Moustafa, Ali & Shaheen, Baraa & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Crop water requirements and crop coefficients for jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) using the SIMDualKc model and assessing irrigation strategies for the Syrian Akkar region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Liu, Meihan & Paredes, Paula & Shi, Haibin & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dou, Xu & Dai, Liping & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Impacts of a shallow saline water table on maize evapotranspiration and groundwater contribution using static water table lysimeters and the dual Kc water balance model SIMDualKc," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Trout, Thomas J. & DeJonge, Kendall C. & Zhang, Huihui, 2025. "Crop water use and crop coefficients of sunflower in the U.S. Central Great Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    6. Silva, Simão P. & Valín, M. Isabel & Mendes, Susana & Araujo-Paredes, Claúdio & Cancela, Javier J., 2024. "Water productivity in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Alvarinho using dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    7. Ramos, Tiago B. & Darouich, Hanaa & Oliveira, Ana R. & Farzamian, Mohammad & Monteiro, Tomás & Castanheira, Nádia & Paz, Ana & Gonçalves, Maria C. & Pereira, Luís S., 2023. "Water use and soil water balance of Mediterranean tree crops assessed with the SIMDualKc model in orchards of southern Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    8. Stöckle, Claudio O. & Liu, Mingliang & Kadam, Sunil A. & Evett, Steven R. & Marek, Gary W. & Colaizzi, Paul D., 2025. "Comparing evapotranspiration estimations using crop model-data fusion and satellite data-based models with lysimetric observations: Implications for irrigation scheduling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    9. Zipper, Sam & Kastens, Jude & Foster, Timothy & Wilson, Blake B. & Melton, Forrest & Grinstead, Ashley & Deines, Jillian M. & Butler, James J. & Marston, Landon T., 2024. "Estimating irrigation water use from remotely sensed evapotranspiration data: Accuracy and uncertainties at field, water right, and regional scales," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    10. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & López-Urrea, R. & Hunsaker, D.J. & Mota, M. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for vegetable crops, an update of FAO56 crop water requirements approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    11. Rallo, G. & Paço, T.A. & Paredes, P. & Puig-Sirera, À. & Massai, R. & Provenzano, G. & Pereira, L.S., 2021. "Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    12. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Jovanovic, N., 2020. "Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    13. Feng, Yu & Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Tang, Dahua & Cui, Ningbo, 2017. "Energy balance and partitioning in partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-206.
    14. Wang, Haidong & Cheng, Minghui & Liao, Zhenqi & Guo, Jinjin & Zhang, Fucang & Fan, Junliang & Feng, Hao & Yang, Qiliang & Wu, Lifeng & Wang, Xiukang, 2023. "Performance evaluation of AquaCrop and DSSAT-SUBSTOR-Potato models in simulating potato growth, yield and water productivity under various drip fertigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    15. Kelly, T.D. & Foster, T. & Schultz, David M., 2023. "Assessing the value of adapting irrigation strategies within the season," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    16. Escarabajal-Henarejos, D. & Fernández-Pacheco, D.G. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Martínez-Molina, L. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2015. "Selection of device to determine temperature gradients for estimating evapotranspiration using energy balance method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 136-147.
    17. Gao, Yang & Yang, Linlin & Shen, Xiaojun & Li, Xinqiang & Sun, Jingsheng & Duan, Aiwang & Wu, Laosheng, 2014. "Winter wheat with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI): Crop coefficients, water-use estimates, and effects of SDI on grain yield and water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1-10.
    18. Yang, Yanmin & Yang, Yonghui & Han, Shumin & Li, Huilong & Wang, Lu & Ma, Qingtao & Ma, Lexin & Wang, Linna & Hou, Zhenjun & Chen, Li & Liu, De Li, 2023. "Comparison of water-saving potential of fallow and crop change with high water-use winter-wheat – summer-maize rotation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    19. Fuentes, Sigfredo & Ortega-Farías, Samuel & Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos & Tongson, Eden & Gonzalez Viejo, Claudia, 2024. "Actual evapotranspiration and energy balance estimation from vineyards using micro-meteorological data and machine learning modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    20. Williams, Larry E. & Levin, Alexander D. & Fidelibus, Matthew W., 2022. "Crop coefficients (Kc) developed from canopy shaded area in California vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:320:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425005645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.