IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v289y2023ics0378377423004237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ridge-furrow planting with black film mulching increases rainfed summer maize production by improving resources utilization on the Loess Plateau of China

Author

Listed:
  • Liao, Zhenqi
  • Zhang, Chen
  • Yu, Shuolei
  • Lai, Zhenlin
  • Wang, Haidong
  • Zhang, Fucang
  • Li, Zhijun
  • Wu, Peng
  • Fan, Junliang

Abstract

Soil mulching has been widely used to improve crop productivity around the world, but how various mulching practices affect soil hydrothermal conditions, water-temperature-radiation utilization and finally grain yield of rainfed maize has been poorly understood. A two-season field experiment was conducted on rainfed summer maize in 2021 and 2022 on the Loess Plateau of China, with six soil mulching practices: flat planting with non-mulching (FPNM), flat planting with full straw mulching (FPSM), flat planting with full black film mulching (FPBF), flat planting with full transparent film mulching (FPTF), ridge-furrow planting with black film mulching on the ridge (RFBF) and ridge-furrow planting with transparent film mulching on the ridge (RFTF). The results showed that compared with the traditional FPNM, the five mulching treatments (FPSM, FPBF, FPTF, RFBF and RFTF) greatly regulated root-zone soil hydrothermal conditions and resulted in obvious soil drying-wetting alternation, which significantly changed the daytime average root-zone soil temperature in the 0 – 25 cm soil layer (by − 1.1 ℃, − 1.9 ℃, + 2.7 ℃, − 1.6℃ and + 0.8 ℃, respectively) and significantly reduced crop evapotranspiration. The five mulching treatments promoted the root growth, leaf area index and canopy light interception rate due to the improved soil water and/or temperature conditions. The structural equation modeling indicated that soil hydrothermal condition and water-temperature-radiation use efficiency could directly or indirectly explain 98% of the grain yield variation under various soil mulching practices; radiation use efficiency (RUE) determined maize production in the water-sufficient year (2021), whereas maize production was mainly determined by crop water productivity (WP) in the water-limited year (2022). The RFBF increased maize production most, followed by RFTF. Compared with FPNM, RFBF increased leaf area index by 45.4%, canopy light interception rate by 19.1%, aboveground biomass by 68.8%, 1000-grain weight by 15.1%, grain yield by 58.6%, WP by 71.8%, thermal time use efficiency by 64.6% and RUE by 30.5%. In conclusion, RFBF optimized the root-zone soil hydrothermal conditions for root growth, which in turn promoted aboveground growth and water-temperature-radiation use efficiency, and finally improved the gain yield of rainfed summer maize on the Loess Plateau of China. Therefore, RFBF was considered as a promising agricultural practice to improve rain-fed summer maize production and resource utilization efficiency on the Loess Plateau of China.

Suggested Citation

  • Liao, Zhenqi & Zhang, Chen & Yu, Shuolei & Lai, Zhenlin & Wang, Haidong & Zhang, Fucang & Li, Zhijun & Wu, Peng & Fan, Junliang, 2023. "Ridge-furrow planting with black film mulching increases rainfed summer maize production by improving resources utilization on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:289:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423004237
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423004237
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:289:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423004237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.