IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v143y2016icp49-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Xiao
  • Zhu, Jiaojun
  • Xing, Zefeng

Abstract

The Three-North Shelter Forest Program (TNSFP), which is the largest ecological afforestation program worldwide, was launched in 1978 and will last until 2050 in the Three-North regions (accounting for 42.4% of China's territory). As a dominant component in the TNSFP, shelterbelts or windbreaks play an important role in preventing from wind damage and erosion and providing appropriate microclimate conditions for crop growth, thus improving crop yields. However, how shelterbelts influence crop yields at the regional scale has not yet been determined because there are certain difficulties in identifying the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields due to other factors such as climatic factors, crop seeds, fertilizer and management measures. In this study, a new approach is used to estimate the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields while overcoming these difficulties. The specific processes used in this study are detailed as follows. First, the climatic potential productivity, which is a combination of solar radiation, temperature and precipitation, was estimated using the multi-sensor remote data. All farmland in the region was divided into high, middle and low climatic potential productivity zones. Second, the crop (i.e., maize) yield across the Northeast China was estimated using the harvest index method and MODIS data. Third, according to the effectively protected distance, the levels of protection provided by the shelterbelts to the farmland at the regional scale were calculated by combining the stand age and the growth status of the shelterbelts using a time series of Landsat images. Finally, the levels of protection and the corresponding maize yields in pixels were extracted and averaged to identify the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields. The results of this study indicated that shelterbelts could enhance crop yields at the regional scale. The contribution rates of shelterbelts to increasing maize yields were found to be 4.68%, 4.28% and 9.45% in the high, middle and low climatic potential productivity zones, respectively. In Northeast China, the average level of protection of farmland was 18.28%, which was obviously lower than the optimal level of protection (i.e., approximately 80%); thus, many shelterbelts must be planted in the future. The findings of this study provide a sound theoretical foundation for increasing crop yields by planning shelterbelts in farmland regions similar to those in Northeast China.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Xiao & Zhu, Jiaojun & Xing, Zefeng, 2016. "Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 49-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:143:y:2016:i:c:p:49-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X15300688
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, X. & Zhu, J.J. & Yan, Q.L. & Song, L.N., 2012. "Effects of land use changes on the groundwater table and the decline of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in southern Horqin Sandy Land, Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 94-106.
    2. Anonymous, 1964. "World Meteorological Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 628-631, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niels Thevs & Alina Joana Gombert & Eva Strenge & Roland Lleshi & Kumar Aliev & Begaiym Emileva, 2019. "Tree Wind Breaks in Central Asia and Their Effects on Agricultural Water Consumption," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Matthew Heron Wilson & Sarah Taylor Lovell, 2016. "Agroforestry—The Next Step in Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Pengfei Cheng & Jie Li & Hongli Zhang & Guanghua Cheng, 2023. "Sustainable Management Behavior of Farmland Shelterbelt of Farmers in Ecologically Fragile Areas: Empirical Evidence from Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Yu Xiao & Gaodi Xie & Chunxia Lu & Changshun Zhang & Jie Xu & Jingya Liu & Keyu Qin & Yiqiu Li & Chaoxuan Xu & Caixia Zhang & Yangyang Wang & Shuang Gan & Jia Liu & Liqiang Ge, 2021. "Suggestions for Revegetation over the Next 30 Years Based on Precipitation in the Three North Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinhao Suo & Shixiong Cao, 2021. "China’s three north shelter forest program: cost–benefit analysis and policy implications," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14605-14618, October.
    2. Hou, Chenli & Tian, Delong & Xu, Bing & Ren, Jie & Hao, Lei & Chen, Ning & Li, Xianyue, 2021. "Use of the stable oxygen isotope method to evaluate the difference in water consumption and utilization strategy between alfalfa and maize fields in an arid shallow groundwater area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Huang, Ze & Liu, Yu & Qiu, Kaiyang & López-Vicente, Manuel & Shen, Weibo & Wu, Gao-Lin, 2021. "Soil-water deficit in deep soil layers results from the planted forest in a semi-arid sandy land: Implications for sustainable agroforestry water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    4. Weijia Liang & Quan Quan & Bohua Wu & Shuhong Mo, 2023. "Response of Vegetation Dynamics in the Three-North Region of China to Climate and Human Activities from 1982 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Deng, Jifeng & Yao, Jiaqi & Zheng, Xiao & Gao, Guanglei, 2021. "Transpiration and canopy stomatal conductance dynamics of Mongolian pine plantations in semiarid deserts, Northern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Dang, Hongzhong & Han, Hui & Chen, Shuai & Li, Mingyang, 2021. "A fragile soil moisture environment exacerbates the climate change-related impacts on the water use by Mongolian Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in northern China: Long-term observations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    7. Song, Lining & Zhu, Jiaojun & Li, Mingcai & Zhang, Jinxin & Lv, Linyou, 2016. "Sources of water used by Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica trees based on stable isotope measurements in a semiarid sandy region of Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 164(P2), pages 281-290.
    8. Wu, Yao & Liu, Tingxi & Paredes, Paula & Duan, Limin & Pereira, Luis S., 2015. "Water use by a groundwater dependent maize in a semi-arid region of Inner Mongolia: Evapotranspiration partitioning and capillary rise," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 222-232.
    9. Song, Lining & Zhu, Jiaojun & Zhang, Ting & Wang, Kai & Wang, Guochen & Liu, Jianhua, 2021. "Higher canopy transpiration rates induced dieback in poplar (Populus × xiaozhuanica) plantations in a semiarid sandy region of Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Deng, Jianqiang & Zhang, Zhixin & Liang, Zhiting & Li, Zhou & Yang, Xianlong & Wang, Zikui & Coulter, Jeffrey A. & Shen, Yuying, 2020. "Replacing summer fallow with annual forage improves crude protein productivity and water use efficiency of the summer fallow-winter wheat cropping system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    11. Li, Maona & Zhang, Yunlong & Ma, Chizhen & Sun, Hongren & Ren, Wei & Wang, Xianguo, 2023. "Maximizing the water productivity and economic returns of alfalfa by deficit irrigation in China: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    12. Yu Xiao & Gaodi Xie & Chunxia Lu & Changshun Zhang & Jie Xu & Jingya Liu & Keyu Qin & Yiqiu Li & Chaoxuan Xu & Caixia Zhang & Yangyang Wang & Shuang Gan & Jia Liu & Liqiang Ge, 2021. "Suggestions for Revegetation over the Next 30 Years Based on Precipitation in the Three North Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Song, Lining & Zhu, Jiaojun & Zheng, Xiao & Li, Xinjunyan & Wang, Kai & Zhang, Jinxin & Wang, Guochen & Sun, Haihong, 2023. "Water use dynamics of trees in a Pinus tabuliformis plantation in semiarid sandy regions, Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    14. D. Dyer, 1977. "Statistical analysis of Fourier coefficients in a restricted harmonic dial," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 99-105, December.
    15. Wang, Linlin & Xie, Junhong & Luo, Zhuzhu & Niu, Yining & Coulter, Jeffrey A. & Zhang, Renzhi & Lingling, Li, 2021. "Forage yield, water use efficiency, and soil fertility response to alfalfa growing age in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Zihe, Liu & Guodong, Jia & Xinxiao, Yu & Weiwei, Lu & Libo, Sun & Yusong, Wang & Baheti, Zierdie, 2021. "Morphological trait as a determining factor for Populus simonii Carr. to survive from drought in semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:143:y:2016:i:c:p:49-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.