IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3656-d1383937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of the Three-North Shelter Forest Program on Vegetation Net Primary Productivity over the Past Two Decades and Its Environmental Benefits in China

Author

Listed:
  • Junling Zhang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, No. 26, Hexing Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yifei Zhang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, No. 26, Hexing Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

Vegetation net primary productivity (NPP) is a crucial indicator for assessing the carbon balance in terrestrial ecosystems. Qualitative and comparative research on the NPP influenced by human activities, climate change, and their interactions remains insufficient. The Three-North Shelter Forest Program (TNSFP), initiated in 1978, provides a valuable reference for such investigations. This study employs an improved residual trend method to analyze the spatiotemporal patterns, trends, and driving factors of vegetation NPP during the second phase of the Three-North Shelter Forest Program (2001–2020), as well as TNSFP’s contribution to vegetation NPP. The results indicate that (1) from 2001 to 2020, overall vegetation NPP exhibited a significant fluctuating upward trend at a rate of 3.69 g C/m −2 annually; and (2) precipitation, accounting for 1.527 g C/m −2 , had a more significant impact on vegetation net productivity compared to temperature (0.002 g C/m −2 ). Climate factors (76%) significantly influenced vegetation NPP in the Three-North Shelter Forest region more than human activities (24%). In the last decade (2011–2020), the climate contribution rate decreased to 67%, while the human activity contribution rate increased by seven percentage points compared to the previous decade (2001–2010); (3) during 2001–2020, TNSFP contributed 10.9% to the total human activity contribution to vegetation net primary productivity, approximately 2.6% of the overall contribution; (4) After the second phase of TNSFP was enacted, PM2.5 levels decreased by an average of −0.57 μg/m −3 /a −1 . Concurrently, soil conservation improved from 6.57 t/km 2 in 2001 to 14.37 t/km 2 in 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Junling Zhang & Yifei Zhang, 2024. "Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of the Three-North Shelter Forest Program on Vegetation Net Primary Productivity over the Past Two Decades and Its Environmental Benefits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3656-:d:1383937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weijia Liang & Quan Quan & Bohua Wu & Shuhong Mo, 2023. "Response of Vegetation Dynamics in the Three-North Region of China to Climate and Human Activities from 1982 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Chen & Rong Ma & Jiansheng Shi & Letian Si & Lefan Zhao & Jun Wu, 2023. "Ecological Risks Arising in the Regional Water Resources in Inner Mongolia Due to a Large-Scale Afforestation Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3656-:d:1383937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.