IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2022-01-2.html

The Innovative Ways of Development in the Oil and Gas Industry of Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Sabina Beisembekova

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, Kazakhstan,)

  • Muratbay Sikhimbayev

    (Scientific Research Institute of Economics and Law, Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, Kazakhstan,)

  • Dinar Sikhimbayeva

    (Scientific Research Institute of Economics and Law, Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, Kazakhstan,)

  • Gulnara Srailova

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, Kazakhstan,)

Abstract

The article considers theoretical and methodological approaches to research of sustainable development of the oil and gas industry of Kazakhstan in modern conditions. Oil and gas industry is viewed as one of the priority directions of government economic policy, which is of particular importance in providing sustainable development of the country. It is noted, that increasing of stability of Kazakhstani oil and gas industry development is presented itself one of the most important issue of state economics. Authors identify main problems affecting on innovative development of the oil and gas industry. It was emphasized, taking into account the current trends, stability of oil and gas complex is affected by the number of conjuncture market factors, including price factors, bank interest rates, market conjuncture for this product, or value of its supply and demand in domestic and foreign markets. Main principles and criteria of innovative development of the oil and gas industry were developed. It is proved, that innovative development of the oil and gas industry should be carried out on the basis of the principles. The forecast of innovative development of the oil and gas industry was built on the basis of designed formula. The forecast of revenue from innovations is on the perspective period in the extraction and processing of high-sulfur, light and heavy oil for 2022-2026 that presented as table and forecast diagram. The innovative development of the oil and gas industry should be carried out on the basis of the researched principles. As a result of conducted research priorities of innovative development of the oil and gas industry were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabina Beisembekova & Muratbay Sikhimbayev & Dinar Sikhimbayeva & Gulnara Srailova, 2022. "The Innovative Ways of Development in the Oil and Gas Industry of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 12(1), pages 9-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-01-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/11505/6183/29439
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/11505/6183
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Batyrbyek KHADYS & Dinar SIKHIMBAYEVA & Altai BOZHKARAULY, 2018. "State Regulation of the Development of the Agro Industrial Complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 127-138.
    2. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:8:y:2017:i:6:p:1928-1932 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 323-351, March.
    4. Alfred Kleinknecht, 1987. "Innovation Patterns in Crisis and Prosperity," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-18559-7, April.
    5. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:127-138 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Harold Hotelling, 1931. "The Economics of Exhaustible Resources," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(2), pages 137-137.
    7. Muratbay SIKHIMBAYEV & Zhanna SHUGAIPOVA, 2017. "Features of Investment Activity Management in the Mineral and Raw Materials Sector of the Economy," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 1928-1932.
    8. V. Polterovich., 2009. "The Innovation Pause Hypothesis and the Strategy of Modernization," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Ariyon & Sukendi Sukendi & Ridwan Manda Putra & Husnul Kausarian, 2024. "Multidimensional Analysis of Sustainability and Integration of Sustainable Energy Practices in Petroleum Field Management," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 14(4), pages 654-662, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Maliar, Lilia & Maliar, Serguei, 2004. "Endogenous Growth And Endogenous Business Cycles," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(5), pages 559-581, November.
    3. Taalbi, Josef, 2017. "What drives innovation? Evidence from economic history," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1437-1453.
    4. Gregor Schwerhoff & Ottmar Edenhofer & Marc Fleurbaey, 2020. "Taxation Of Economic Rents," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 398-423, April.
    5. Manel Kamoun & Ines Abdelkafi & Abdelfetah Ghorbel, 2019. "The Impact of Renewable Energy on Sustainable Growth: Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 221-237, March.
    6. Ramana Nanda & Matthew Rhodes-Kropf, 2010. "Financing Risk and Innovation," Harvard Business School Working Papers 11-013, Harvard Business School, revised Jan 2014.
    7. Manel Kamoun & Ines Abdelkafi & Abdelfetah Ghorbel, 2020. "Does Renewable Energy Technologies and Poverty Affect the Sustainable Growth in Emerging Countries?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 865-887, September.
    8. Gros, Daniel & Alcidi, Cinzia, 2014. "The Global Economy in 2030: Trends and Strategies for Europe," CEPS Papers 9142, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    9. Lafforgue, Gilles, 2008. "Stochastic technical change, non-renewable resource and optimal sustainable growth," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 540-554, December.
    10. Voosholz, Frauke, 2014. "A survey on modeling economic growth. With special interest on natural resource use," CAWM Discussion Papers 69, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).
    11. Adrien Bilal & James H. Stock, 2025. "A Guide to Macroeconomics and Climate Change," NBER Working Papers 33567, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Robinson, James A. & Srinivasan, T.N., 1997. "Long-term consequences of population growth: Technological change, natural resources, and the environment," Handbook of Population and Family Economics, in: M. R. Rosenzweig & Stark, O. (ed.), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 21, pages 1175-1298, Elsevier.
    13. Hart, Rob, 2002. "Growth, environment, and culture--encompassing competing ideologies in one 'new growth' model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 253-267, February.
    14. van Zon, Adriaan & Lontzek, Thomas S., 2008. "R&D-driven biases in energy-saving technical change: A putty-practically-clay approach," Kiel Working Papers 1474, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    15. Verspagen, Bart, 2000. "Economic Growth and Technological Change," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. Hassler, J. & Krusell, P. & Smith, A.A., 2016. "Environmental Macroeconomics," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1893-2008, Elsevier.
    17. André Grimaud & Luc Rouge, 2025. "Technology Shocks, Directed Technical Progress and Climate Change," Working Papers hal-05022723, HAL.
    18. Rik Rozendaal, 2025. "Market Power, Innovation, and the Green Transition," CESifo Working Paper Series 11938, CESifo.
    19. Diana Dimitrova, 2018. "The 2018 Nobel Prize in Economics," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 98-152.
    20. amayed, Yasser, 2025. "Transition énergétique, durabilité et réduction des émissions en Tunisie : une analyse empirique par le modèle ardl [Energy transition, sustainability and emission reduction in Tunisia: an empirical analysis using the ardl model]," MPRA Paper 124142, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q32 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-01-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.