IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/v3y2015i3p33-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antalya MP’s in Turkish Multi Party Period

Author

Listed:
  • D. Ali ARSLAN
  • Gülten ARSLAN
  • Zehra SÖZER
  • Sadettin BAÞTÜRK
  • Kadir ULUSOY

    (Mersin Üniversitesi
    Dicle Üniversitesi
    Mersin Üniversitesi
    Mersin Üniversitesi)

Abstract

In this study, the deputies who play a vital role in the power structure of society are chosen as the research subjects. The political elites have a different and important place among the elite groups. The deputies form one of the most basic elements of the political elite. They play the strategic roles within the decision-making process and the structure of society. Antalya deputies, along with the lawmakers from the other provinces, form the most important part of the Turkish political elite. This study was designed to find general characteristics of Antalya MP’s in Multi Party Period (Since 1946 up to Date). On the final stage the place of Antalya MP’s in Turkish political elites will be examined. Social background peculiarities (gender, age, education, occupation, family size) were used to achieve the objectives. Documentary and historical research techniques were applied in the paper. An original data set was produced for analysis from the official publications and records and publications of the Turkish Grand National Assembly which is the main legislative organ in Turkey. The data set was analysed by using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Findings clearly show that some social groups have been over representing, the others have been under represented amongst Antalya MP’s.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Ali ARSLAN & Gülten ARSLAN & Zehra SÖZER & Sadettin BAÞTÜRK & Kadir ULUSOY, 2015. "Antalya MP’s in Turkish Multi Party Period," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 3(3), pages 33-62, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:3:y:2015:i:3:p:33-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://socialsciences.eurasianacademy.org/dergi/../dergi//cok-partili-donem-turk-siyasal-hayatinda-antalya-milletvekilleri201505.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bachrach, Peter & Baratz, Morton S., 1962. "Two Faces of Power1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(4), pages 947-952, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mareike Kleine, 2013. "Daniel Finke, Thomas König, Sven-Oliver Proksch and George Tsebelis. 2012. Reforming the European Union: Realizing the Impossible (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 111-115, March.
    2. Lewis, Jenny M., 2006. "Being around and knowing the players: Networks of influence in health policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(9), pages 2125-2136, May.
    3. Joao A. Ribeiro & Robert W. Scapens, 2004. "Power, ERP systems and resistance to management accounting: a case study," FEP Working Papers 141, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    4. Šálka, Jaroslav & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Hricová, Zuzana, 2016. "Factors of political power — The example of forest owners associations in Slovakia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 88-98.
    5. Perrons, Robert K., 2009. "The open kimono: How Intel balances trust and power to maintain platform leadership," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1300-1312, October.
    6. Carl Devos, 1998. "The structural transition of the production system: Regional policy in common understanding," ERSA conference papers ersa98p78, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Michael Givel, 2010. "The Evolution of the Theoretical Foundations of Punctuated Equilibrium Theory in Public Policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(2), pages 187-198, March.
    8. Fettke, Ulrike, 2018. "Etablierte und Außenseiter in der Kommunalpolitik? Eine Fallstudie zu Windkraft in einer badenwürttembergischen Kleinstadt," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2018-03, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    9. Hrelja, Robert & Isaksson, Karolina & Richardson, Tim, 2013. "Choosing conflict on the road to sustainable mobility: A risky strategy for breaking path dependency in urban policy making," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 195-205.
    10. Handler, Joel F., 2005. "Myth and ceremony in workfare: rights, contracts, and client satisfaction," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-124, February.
    11. Contandriopoulos, Damien & Brousselle, Astrid, 2010. "Reliable in their failure: An analysis of healthcare reform policies in public systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(2-3), pages 144-152, May.
    12. Margaret Hodgins, 2021. "Taking on the Institution: An Autoethnographic Account," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Ripoll Servent, Ariadna and Amy Busby, 2013. "Introduction: Agency and influence inside the EU institutions," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 17, July.
    14. Piet Verschuren & Bas Arts, 2005. "Quantifying influence in complex decision making by means of paired comparisons," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 495-516, January.
    15. Leonie Janssen-Jansen & Melika Levelt, 2005. "Borderless Space - Ideas for Regional Collaboration," ERSA conference papers ersa05p292, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Paster, Thomas, 2015. "Bringing power back in: A review of the literature on the role of business in welfare state politics," MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Mazumder, Soumyajit & Yan, Alan, 2020. "What Do Americans Want From (Private) Government? Experimental Evidence Demonstrates that Americans Want Workplace Democracy," SocArXiv j9asz, Center for Open Science.
    18. Fabrizio Cafaggi & Katharina Pistor, 2015. "Regulatory capabilities: A normative framework for assessing the distributional effects of regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 95-107, June.
    19. Richard C. Witmer & Joshua Johnson & Frederick J. Boehmke, 2014. "American Indian Policy in the States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1043-1063, December.
    20. Carter, Chris & Clegg, Stewart & Wåhlin, Nils, 2011. "When science meets strategic realpolitik: The case of the Copenhagen UN climate change summit," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 682-697.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:3:y:2015:i:3:p:33-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socialsciences.eurasianacademy.org/eng/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.