IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Was bringen Riester-Produkte dem Verbraucher?: Analyseergebnisse einer anbieterunabhängigen Testorganisation

Listed author(s):
  • Barbara Sternberger-Frey
Registered author(s):

    The Riester pension scheme was initiated by the government in order to compensate for the reductions in the state pension scheme, thus, avoiding, or at least alleviating, the looming threat of poverty among the elderly. Nevertheless, experience shows that public participation in government-subsidized pension-saving products is insufficient. Most Riester products are too expensive, too complicated and not transparent enough to encourage consumers to save more for their pensions. Furthermore savers only marginally benefit from government grants and subsidies due to acquisition expenses, administration charges, and excessive profit-margins of Riester products. In order to meet the original objectives of the Riester reform, a fundamental revision of the eligibility rules and regulations product is warranted. One solution to make the Riester pension scheme more attractive for consumers is the retirement provision account called "Altersvorsorgekonto", as suggested by the Consumer Commission of Baden-Württemberg. It is characterized by its simplicity, transparency, flexibility and security. Mit Einführung der Riester-Rente wollte der Gesetzgeber seinen Bürgern ermöglichen, die seinerzeitigen Kürzungen bei der gesetzlichen Rente wenigstens teilweise zu kompensieren - und damit einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Armutsvermeidung leisten. Doch die Praxis zeigt: Die Beteiligung an der staatlich geförderten Privatvorsorge ist unzureichend. Das Gros der Riester-Produkte ist zu teuer, zu intransparent und zu kompliziert, um Verbraucher zum Vorsorgesparen zu animieren. Vor allem kommt die staatliche Förderung kaum bei den Sparern an, sondern wird oft ganz oder teilweise durch Abschluss- und Vertriebskosten oder von überzogenen Gewinnerzielungsabsichten der Anbieter aufgezehrt. Um den Zielen der Riester-Reform gerecht zu werden, ist daher eine grundlegende Überarbeitung der Förderregeln und Produktvorschriften geboten. Ein Lösungsvorschlag, um die Riester-Rente einfacher und attraktiver zu machen, könnte auch das Altersvorsorgekonto sein, für das sich unter anderem die Verbraucherkommission Baden-Württemberg stark macht.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its journal Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Volume (Year): 81 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 115-132

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:81-2-9
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin

    Phone: xx49-30-89789-0
    Fax: xx49-30-89789-200
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Kornelia Hagen & Axel Kleinlein, 2011. "Zehn Jahre Riester-Rente: kein Grund zum Feiern," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 78(47), pages 3-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:81-2-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.