IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Länderclubs mit ähnlichen Innovationssystemen

Listed author(s):
  • Stephanie Schneider
Registered author(s):

    The innovation indicator Germany determines the relative positions of 17 highly developed economies in an international comparison regarding their innovation capability. Basing on that indicator countries with a similar innovation structure are grouped together. Similarity mainly refers to the innovation level of the countries, but also to their strengths and weaknesses regarding every single area of innovation capability. A hierarchic cluster analysis is used to form the groups. The result shows that there are three country clubs with a similar innovation level, whereas Germany belongs to the group that has its position in the middle and contains several countries. Furthermore, it can be differentiated between five innovation profiles. Germany has a similar profile of strengths and weaknesses like Japan, Austria and Switzerland, whereas only Switzerland belongs to the leading group concerning innovation capability. A comparison of the country clubs regarding similar absolute and relative performance can be a guideline to countries having a weaker innovation and demonstrate how a higher innovation capability can be achieved by pursuing a basically similar innovation strategy. Der Innovationsindikator Deutschland bestimmt die relative Position von 17 hochentwickelten Volkswirtschaften im internationalen Vergleich bezüglich ihrer Innovationsfähigkeit. Mithilfe dieses Indikators werden Gruppen von Ländern gebildet, die ein ähnliches Innovationssystem aufweisen. Die Ähnlichkeit bezieht sich dabei zum einen vorwiegend auf das Innovationsniveau der Länder und zum anderen auf ihre Stärken und Schwächen in den einzelnen Bereichen der Innovationsfähigkeit. Die Bildung der Gruppen erfolgt jeweils mittels einer hierarchischen Clusteranalyse. Es zeigt sich, dass drei Länderclubs mit einem ähnlichen Innovationsniveau existieren, wobei Deutschland dort zu einem mehrere Länder umfassenden Mittelfeld gehört. Ferner können fünf Innovationsprofile unterschieden werden. Deutschland hat demnach ein ähnliches Stärken- und Schwächen- Profil wie Japan, Österreich und die Schweiz, wobei nur die Schweiz zugleich zur Spitzengruppe bezüglich der Innovationsfähigkeit gehört. Eine Gegenüberstellung der Länderclubs bezüglich ähnlicher absoluter und relativer Performance kann für innovationsschwächere Länder Anhaltspunkte geben, wie sich mit einer grundsätzlich ähnlichen Innovationsstrategie eine höhere Innovationsfähigkeit erzielen lässt.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its journal Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Volume (Year): 77 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 65-78

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-2-5
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin

    Phone: xx49-30-89789-0
    Fax: xx49-30-89789-200
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Glenn Milligan & Martha Cooper, 1985. "An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 159-179, June.
    2. Axel Werwatz & Heike Belitz & Tanja Kirn & Jens Schmidt-Ehmcke, 2006. "Innovationsindikator Deutschland 2006," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 22, number pbk22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-2-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.