IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/77-2-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Länderclubs mit ähnlichen Innovationssystemen

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Schneider

Abstract

The innovation indicator Germany determines the relative positions of 17 highly developed economies in an international comparison regarding their innovation capability. Basing on that indicator countries with a similar innovation structure are grouped together. Similarity mainly refers to the innovation level of the countries, but also to their strengths and weaknesses regarding every single area of innovation capability. A hierarchic cluster analysis is used to form the groups. The result shows that there are three country clubs with a similar innovation level, whereas Germany belongs to the group that has its position in the middle and contains several countries. Furthermore, it can be differentiated between five innovation profiles. Germany has a similar profile of strengths and weaknesses like Japan, Austria and Switzerland, whereas only Switzerland belongs to the leading group concerning innovation capability. A comparison of the country clubs regarding similar absolute and relative performance can be a guideline to countries having a weaker innovation and demonstrate how a higher innovation capability can be achieved by pursuing a basically similar innovation strategy. Der Innovationsindikator Deutschland bestimmt die relative Position von 17 hochentwickelten Volkswirtschaften im internationalen Vergleich bezüglich ihrer Innovationsfähigkeit. Mithilfe dieses Indikators werden Gruppen von Ländern gebildet, die ein ähnliches Innovationssystem aufweisen. Die Ähnlichkeit bezieht sich dabei zum einen vorwiegend auf das Innovationsniveau der Länder und zum anderen auf ihre Stärken und Schwächen in den einzelnen Bereichen der Innovationsfähigkeit. Die Bildung der Gruppen erfolgt jeweils mittels einer hierarchischen Clusteranalyse. Es zeigt sich, dass drei Länderclubs mit einem ähnlichen Innovationsniveau existieren, wobei Deutschland dort zu einem mehrere Länder umfassenden Mittelfeld gehört. Ferner können fünf Innovationsprofile unterschieden werden. Deutschland hat demnach ein ähnliches Stärken- und Schwächen- Profil wie Japan, Österreich und die Schweiz, wobei nur die Schweiz zugleich zur Spitzengruppe bezüglich der Innovationsfähigkeit gehört. Eine Gegenüberstellung der Länderclubs bezüglich ähnlicher absoluter und relativer Performance kann für innovationsschwächere Länder Anhaltspunkte geben, wie sich mit einer grundsätzlich ähnlichen Innovationsstrategie eine höhere Innovationsfähigkeit erzielen lässt.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Schneider, 2008. "Länderclubs mit ähnlichen Innovationssystemen," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(2), pages 65-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-2-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/DH/doi/pdf/10.3790/vjh.77.2.65
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn Milligan & Martha Cooper, 1985. "An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 159-179, June.
    2. Axel Werwatz & Heike Belitz & Tanja Kirn & Jens Schmidt-Ehmcke, 2006. "Innovationsindikator Deutschland 2006," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 22, number pbk22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation systems; cluster analysis; international comparsion; composite indicator;

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
    • P51 - Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-2-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.