IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2019i3p28-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing Offers with Apparently Unusual Low Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei Mirel FLOREA

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Riana Iren RADU

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Silvius STANCIU

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

Abstract

Through Public Procurement, the Contracting Authorities aim at obtaining products, works or services. Starting from identifying the necessity, a series of procedures are followed for its satisfaction. Considering the complexity of the procurement process, the desired result will not appear in case certain stages are bypassed. These omissions can have repercussions on the offered price when either the Contracting Authority did not explain sufficiently clear in the awarding documentation the need or it did not assess it adequately, as well as when the Tenderer did not completely understand the complexity of the requested work / service / product. In these conditions, the present study aims at analyzing from the point of view of both parties the problems related to the unusually low price estimated by the Contracting Authority or proposed by the Tenderer for services and its influence on the quality of the provided services.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei Mirel FLOREA & Riana Iren RADU & Silvius STANCIU, 2019. "Addressing Offers with Apparently Unusual Low Prices," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 28-36.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2019:i:3:p:28-36
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/eai1584040952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2019_3/Florea_Radu_Stanciu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35219/eai1584040952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julien Chicot & Mireille Matt, 2018. "Public procurement of innovation: a review of rationales, designs, and contributions to grand challenges," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 480-492.
    2. Vargo, Stephen L. & Koskela-Huotari, Kaisa & Baron, Steve & Edvardsson, Bo & Reynoso, Javier & Colurcio, Maria, 2017. "A systems perspective on markets – Toward a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 260-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bleda, Mercedes & Chicot, Julien, 2020. "The role of public procurement in the formation of markets for innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 186-196.
    2. Kertcher, Zack & Venkatraman, Rohan & Coslor, Erica, 2020. "Pleasingly parallel: Early cross-disciplinary work for innovation diffusion across boundaries in grid computing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 581-594.
    3. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Sofia Patsali, 2019. "Opening the black box of university-suppliers' co-invention: some field study evidence," Working Papers of BETA 2019-46, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Daniel Adrian Gârdan & Mihai Andronie & Iuliana Petronela Gârdan & Irina Elena Andronie & Mariana Iatagan & Iulian Hurloiu, 2018. "Bioeconomy Development and Using of Intellectual Capital for the Creation of Competitive Advantages by SMEs in the Field of Biotechnology," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 647-647, August.
    6. Zhang, Zhaowen & Jiang, Yaohui, 2022. "Can green public procurement change energy efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Gruber, Mario, 2020. "An evolutionary perspective on adoption-diffusion theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 535-541.
    8. Katharine Tröger & Margareta Amy Lelea & Brigitte Kaufmann, 2018. "The Fine Line between Trusting and Cheating: Exploring Relationships between Actors in Ugandan Pineapple Value Chains," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(5), pages 823-841, December.
    9. O. C. Ferrell, 2018. "Marketing’s identity crisis: it’s complicated," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(1), pages 30-38, June.
    10. Nathaniel D. Line & Rodney C. Runyan & Tracy Gonzalez-Padron, 2019. "Multiple stakeholder market orientation: a service-dominant logic perspective of the market orientation paradigm," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 42-60, June.
    11. Carlos Contreras & Julio Angulo, 2022. "Innovation and Tariff-adjustment Options in Public-private Partnerships," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 243(4), pages 51-81, December.
    12. Miller, Fiona A. & Lehoux, Pascale, 2020. "The innovation impacts of public procurement offices: The case of healthcare procurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    13. Piotr Łasak & Sławomir Wyciślak, 2022. "Dynamics in Complex Systems Amidst Crisis 2008+: Financial Regulatory and Supervisory Reflections," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Julia A. Fehrer, 2020. "Rethinking marketing: back to purpose," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 179-184, December.
    15. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:616 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Francesco Polese & Debora Sarno & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi, 2018. "From B2B to A4A: An Integrated Framework for Viable Value Co-Creation," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 135-161.
    17. Fernandes, Josi & Mason, Katy & Chakrabarti, Ronika, 2019. "Managing to make market agencements: The temporally bound elements of stigma in favelas," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 128-142.
    18. Reale, Filippo, 2021. "Mission-oriented innovation policy and the challenge of urgency: Lessons from Covid-19 and beyond," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Roberto Vivona, 2021. "Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study [Creating the Conditions for Radical Public Service Innovation]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 379-396.
    20. Martin Januska & Alena Palacka, 2023. "Critical success factors for public procurement of innovative solutions in Central Europe: Empirical study," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 24-41, June.
    21. Hans Kjellberg & Riikka Murto, 2021. "Theorizing markets," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 207-215, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2019:i:3:p:28-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.