IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v2y2002i2p128-138.html

Research of the marketing complex of the pharmacy institution

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Onishchenko
  • Oleksii Seryogin
  • Cameron Batmanghlich

Abstract

Specific features of pharmaceutical marketing, in which the patient is the main one, are defined. It is shown that the most relevant for Ukrainian pharmaceuticals is the implementation of the concept of social and ethical marketing. Compared to the traditional marketing complex, which consists of four components: product, price, place, promotion, pharmacy adds – people – who are directly related to the sale of the product. An assessment of the pharmaceutical market of Ukraine is given. An analysis of consumers and competitors was carried out using the example of Elinite LLC pharmacy. The marketing activity of the Elinite LLC pharmacy was studied, the main problems in the organization of marketing were analyzed and measures for its improvement were developed

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Onishchenko & Oleksii Seryogin & Cameron Batmanghlich, 2002. "Research of the marketing complex of the pharmacy institution," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 2(2), pages 128-138, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2002:i:2:p:128-138
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-2-128-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_ONISHCHENKO+.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-2-128-138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2002:i:2:p:128-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.