IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v2y2002i2p128-138.html

Research of the marketing complex of the pharmacy institution

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Onishchenko
  • Oleksii Seryogin
  • Cameron Batmanghlich

Abstract

Specific features of pharmaceutical marketing, in which the patient is the main one, are defined. It is shown that the most relevant for Ukrainian pharmaceuticals is the implementation of the concept of social and ethical marketing. Compared to the traditional marketing complex, which consists of four components: product, price, place, promotion, pharmacy adds – people – who are directly related to the sale of the product. An assessment of the pharmaceutical market of Ukraine is given. An analysis of consumers and competitors was carried out using the example of Elinite LLC pharmacy. The marketing activity of the Elinite LLC pharmacy was studied, the main problems in the organization of marketing were analyzed and measures for its improvement were developed

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Onishchenko & Oleksii Seryogin & Cameron Batmanghlich, 2002. "Research of the marketing complex of the pharmacy institution," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 2(2), pages 128-138, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2002:i:2:p:128-138
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-2-128-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_ONISHCHENKO+.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-2-128-138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kareem Haggag & Devin G Pope & Kinsey B Bryant-Lees & Maarten W Bos, 2019. "Attribution Bias in Consumer Choice," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(5), pages 2136-2183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony LokTing Yim, 2023. "How Early Morning Classes Change Academic Trajectories: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1334, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    2. Francisco Gomes & Michael Haliassos & Tarun Ramadorai, 2021. "Household Finance," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(3), pages 919-1000, September.
    3. Gagnon-Bartsch, Tristan & Bushong, Benjamin, 2022. "Learning with misattribution of reference dependence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Haggag, Kareem & Patterson, Richard W. & Pope, Nolan G. & Feudo, Aaron, 2021. "Attribution bias in major decisions: Evidence from the United States Military Academy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Meier, Pascal Flurin & Flepp, Raphael & Franck, Egon, 2025. "Expectational reference points and belief formation: Field evidence from financial analysts," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Nisvan Erkal & Lata Gangadharan & Boon Han Koh, 2022. "By chance or by choice? Biased attribution of others’ outcomes when social preferences matter," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 413-443, April.
    7. Adhvaryu, Achyuta & Nyshadham, Anant & Xu, Huayu, 2023. "Hostel takeover: Living conditions, reference dependence, and the well-being of migrant workers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Jonathan H.W. Tan & Zhao Zichen & Daniel John Zizzo, 2023. "Scientific Inference from Field and Laboratory Economic Experiments: Empirical Evidence," Discussion Papers Series 663, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    9. Fang, Ximeng & Singhal, Puja, 2024. "Weather to pay attention to energy efficiency on the housing market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    10. Cappelen, Alexander & Liu, Yiming & Nielsen, Hedda & Tungodden, Bertil, 2024. "Fairness in a Society of Unequal Opportunities," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 17/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    11. Jafarli, Farid, 2024. "Interpersonal Projection Bias: Experimental Evidence," SocArXiv qrk73, Center for Open Science.
    12. Pascal Kieren & Martin Weber, 2025. "Expectation Formation Under Uninformative Signals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 5123-5141, June.
    13. Tan, Jonathan H.W. & Zhao, Zichen & Zizzo, Daniel John, 2025. "Inference from field and laboratory experiments in economics: empirical evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. Matt Lowe, 2021. "Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(6), pages 1807-1844, June.
    15. Dorothy Lianlian Jiang & Shun Ye & Liang Zhao & Bin Gu, 2025. "Do Reductions in Search Costs for Partial Information on Online Platforms Lead to Better Consumer Decisions? Evidence of Cognitive Miser Behavior from a Natural Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 1780-1798, September.
    16. Yi Han & Yiming Liu & George Loewenstein, 2023. "Confusing Context with Character: Correspondence Bias in Economic Interactions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1070-1091, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2002:i:2:p:128-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.