IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v54y2019i6p2575-2603_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting U.S. Bank Failures with MIDAS Logit Models

Author

Listed:
  • Audrino, Francesco
  • Kostrov, Alexander
  • Ortega, Juan-Pablo

Abstract

We propose a new approach based on a generalization of the logit model to improve prediction accuracy in U.S. bank failures. Mixed-data sampling (MIDAS) is introduced in the context of a logistic regression. We also mitigate the class-imbalance problem in data and adjust the classification accuracy evaluation. In applying the suggested model to the period from 2004 to 2016, we show that it correctly classifies significantly more bank failure cases than the classic logit model, in particular for long-term forecasting horizons. Some of the largest recent bank failures in the United States that had been previously misclassified are now correctly predicted.

Suggested Citation

  • Audrino, Francesco & Kostrov, Alexander & Ortega, Juan-Pablo, 2019. "Predicting U.S. Bank Failures with MIDAS Logit Models," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(6), pages 2575-2603, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:54:y:2019:i:6:p:2575-2603_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109018001308/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patel, Ajay & Sorokina, Nonna & Thornton, John H., 2022. "Liquidity and bank capital structure," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    2. Kristóf, Tamás & Virág, Miklós, 2022. "EU-27 bank failure prediction with C5.0 decision trees and deep learning neural networks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Zhou, Ying & Shen, Long & Ballester, Laura, 2023. "A two-stage credit scoring model based on random forest: Evidence from Chinese small firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Jiang, Cuixia & Xiong, Wei & Xu, Qifa & Liu, Yezheng, 2021. "Predicting default of listed companies in mainland China via U-MIDAS Logit model with group lasso penalty," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    5. Lee, Kangbok & Joo, Sunghoon & Baik, Hyeoncheol & Han, Sumin & In, Joonhwan, 2020. "Unbalanced data, type II error, and nonlinearity in predicting M&A failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 271-287.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:54:y:2019:i:6:p:2575-2603_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.