IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jechis/v76y2016i04p1152-1181_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Economic Impacts of Coal Mining in the United States 1870 to 1970

Author

Listed:
  • Matheis, Mike

Abstract

This article expands upon the current “resource curse†literature by using newly collected county data, spanning over a century, to capture the short- and long-run effects of coal mining activity. It provides evidence that increased levels of coal production had positive net impacts on county-level population and manufacturing activity over an initial ten-year span, which become negative over the subsequent decades. The results provide evidence that any existence of a “resource curse†on local areas due to coal mining is a long-run phenomenon, and in the short run there are potential net benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheis, Mike, 2016. "Local Economic Impacts of Coal Mining in the United States 1870 to 1970," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(4), pages 1152-1181, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:76:y:2016:i:04:p:1152-1181_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002205071600098X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morck, Randall & Nakamura, Masao, 2018. "Japan's ultimately unaccursed natural resources-financed industrialization," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 32-54.
    2. Berbée, Paul & Braun, Sebastian Till & Franke, Richard, 2022. "Reversing Fortunes of German Regions, 1926–2019: Boon and Bane of Early Industrialization?," IZA Discussion Papers 15463, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Ferrara, Andreas & Testa, Patrick A., 2020. "Resource Blessing? Oil, Risk, and Religious Communities as Social Insurance in the U.S. South," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 513, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Miriam Fritzsche & Nikolaus Wolf, 2023. "Fickle Fossils. Economic Growth, Coal and the European Oil Invasion, 1900-2015," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 465, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    5. Miriam Fritzsche & Nikolaus Wolf, 2023. "Fickle Fossils. Economic Growth, Coal and the European Oil Invasion, 1900-2015," CESifo Working Paper Series 10805, CESifo.
    6. Barrows, Geoffrey & Garg, Teevrat & Jha, Akshaya, 2019. "The Health Costs of Coal-Fired Power Plants in India," IZA Discussion Papers 12838, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Miriam Fritzsche & Nikolaus Wolf, 2022. "Fickle Fossils. Economic Growth, Coal and the European Oil Invasion, 1900-2015," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0003, Berlin School of Economics.
    8. Berry, Kevin & James, Alexander & Smith, Brock & Watson, Brett, 2022. "Geography, Geology, and Regional Economic Development," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Winkler, Hernan, 2021. "When Coal Leaves Town: Can Local Governments Help?," MPRA Paper 112587, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Vania Licio, 2023. "The Italian coal shortage: the price of import and distribution, 1861–1911," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 17(3), pages 501-532, September.
    11. Andreas Ferrara & Price V. Fishback, 2020. "Discrimination, Migration, and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from World War I," NBER Working Papers 26936, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Ran Abramitzky & Philipp Ager & Leah Boustan & Elior Cohen & Casper Hansen, 2021. "The Effect of Immigration on Local Labor Markets: Lessons from the 1920s Border Closure," Research Working Paper RWP 21-09, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    13. Galina Williams & Ruth Nikijuluw, 2020. "The economic and social benefit of coal mining: the case study of regional Queensland," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1113-1132, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:76:y:2016:i:04:p:1152-1181_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jeh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.