IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v28y2002i1p51-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similar Challenges, Different Solutions: Reforming Labour Market Policies in Germany and Canada during the 1990s

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas R. Klassen
  • Steffen Schneider

Abstract

Canada and Germany experienced considerable economic challenges and political shocks during the 1990s. High unemployment and regional labour market disparities raised concerns about the adequacy of labour market policies in both countries. Yet despite similar challenges, the two federations pursued different reform paths. Unemployment insurance programs were only marginally changed in each nation. With regard to active labour market policies, however, Canada pursued an asymmetrical decentralization granting more power to the provinces, while Germany reinforced its corporatist mechanisms. Explaining the different reform paths requires consideration of a range of variables including the contrast between Germany's intrastate and Canada's interstate federalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas R. Klassen & Steffen Schneider, 2002. "Similar Challenges, Different Solutions: Reforming Labour Market Policies in Germany and Canada during the 1990s," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 28(1), pages 51-69, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:28:y:2002:i:1:p:51-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28200203%2928%3A1%3C51%3ASCDSRL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Carlin & David Soskice, 1997. "Shocks to the System: the German Political Economy Under Stress," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 159(1), pages 57-76, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Driffill & Marcus Miller, 2003. "No Credit for Transition: European Institutions and German Unemployment," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 50(1), pages 41-60, February.
    2. Fabio Canova & Morten Ravn, 2000. "The Macroeconomic Effects of German Unification: Real Adjustments and the Welfare State," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(3), pages 423-460, July.
    3. Steven Casper;Hannah Kettler, 2000. "The Road to Sustainability in the UK and German Biotechnology Industries," Monograph 000466, Office of Health Economics.
    4. Annamaria Simonazzi, 2002. "Innovation and growth: supply and demand factors in the US expansion," Working Papers in Public Economics 53, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
    5. Thorsten H. Block, 1998. "Financial Market Liberalization and the Changing Character of Corporate Governance," SCEPA working paper series. 1998-08, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    6. Hancké, Bob, 1999. "Revisiting the French model: coordination and restructuring in French industry in the 1980s," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 99-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Guillaume Cléaud & Francisco de Castro Fernández & Jorge Durán Laguna & Lucia Granelli & Martin Hallet & Anne Jaubertie & Carlos Maravall Rodriguez & Diana Ognyanova & Balazs Palvolgyi & Tsvetan Tsali, 2019. "Cruising at Different Speeds: Similarities and Divergences between the German and the French Economies," European Economy - Discussion Papers 103, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    8. Andrew Martin, 2000. "Social Pacts, Unemployment, and EMU Macroeconomic Policy," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 32, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    9. Ulman, Lloyd & Gerlach, Knut, 2002. "The Uneasy Triangle," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt2dd6z05p, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Michael Fichler, 1997. "Institutional transfer and the transformation of labour relations in east(ern) Germany: lessons for central and eastern Europe?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 3(2), pages 390-408, August.
    11. Lila J. Truett & Dale B. Truett, 2011. "Whither Germany and the EMU In a Challenging Environment?," Working Papers 0019, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    12. Crafts, Nicholas & Mills, Terence, 2001. "TFP Growth in British and German Manufacturing, 1950-96," CEPR Discussion Papers 3078, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2004. "Technológiai fejlődés, szakosodás, komplementaritás, szerkezetátalakulás [Technological development, technological complementarity and structural change]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 362-378.
    14. Beissinger, Thomas & Hellier, Joël & Marczak, Martyna, 2020. "Divergence in Labour Force Growth: Should Wages and Prices Grow Faster in Germany?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 620, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    15. Ulman, Lloyd & Gerlach, Knut, 2003. "An essay on collective bargaining and unemployment in Germany," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt16v5m721, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    16. Carlin, Wendy & Glyn, Andrew & Van Reenen, John, 2001. "Export Market Performance of OECD Countries: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Cost Competitiveness," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(468), pages 128-162, January.
    17. Cusack, Thomas R., 1997. "On the road to Weimar? The political economy of popular satisfaction with government and regime performance in Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 97-303, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:28:y:2002:i:1:p:51-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.