IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v11y2023i4p225-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalisation as a Prospect for Work–Life Balance and Inclusion: A Natural Experiment in German Hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Schongen

    (GESIS–Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany / School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Germany)

Abstract

Digitalisation has a wide range of impacts on the workplace, such as enabling new work models with flexible work schedules, changing work content, or increasing workplace control. These changes directly affect not only individuals’ work but also their private lives. Scholars theorise that digitalisation either enables or impedes workers’ ability to maximise their work–life balance, which in turn fosters or inhibits the social inclusion of some societal groups and reduces or reproduces social inequalities. Focusing on the German healthcare sector, I explore the impact of using networked digital technologies on work–life balance, and whether it influences gender and educational inequalities. Pressured by government, economic concerns, and medical innovation, this sector is undergoing a transformation process that is expediting the introduction of new networked digital technologies. Thus, it provides an ideal setting for empirical investigation, as one core assumption about digitalisation is that technological innovation at work has societal consequences that must be individually mastered. To assess the relationship between digitalisation and work–life balance, I use survey data from hospital employees on the use of networked digital technologies and individual outcomes. The research is designed as a natural experiment. The treatment group comprises employees at a university hospital equipped with cutting‐edge networked digital technologies (N = 1,117); the control group comprises employees at several church‐owned hospitals (N = 415) with a level of digitalisation corresponding to the average for the sector. I first discuss confounders and then employ quantitative methods to establish a link between digitalisation and work–life balance, assess its direction, and address gender and educational inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Schongen, 2023. "Digitalisation as a Prospect for Work–Life Balance and Inclusion: A Natural Experiment in German Hospitals," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 225-238.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:225-238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7117
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akanksha Negi & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2021. "Revisiting regression adjustment in experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 504-534, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sloczynski, Tymon, 2020. "Interpreting OLS Estimands When Treatment Effects Are Heterogeneous: Smaller Groups Get Larger Weights," IZA Discussion Papers 13283, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Jiang, Liang & Phillips, Peter C.B. & Tao, Yubo & Zhang, Yichong, 2023. "Regression-adjusted estimation of quantile treatment effects under covariate-adaptive randomizations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 758-776.
    3. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2023. "Simple approaches to nonlinear difference-in-differences with panel data," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(3), pages 31-66.
    4. Yuehao Bai & Liang Jiang & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh & Yichong Zhang, 2023. "Covariate Adjustment in Experiments with Matched Pairs," Papers 2302.04380, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    5. Joao M.C. Santos Silva & Rainer Winkelmann, 2024. "MisspecifiÂ…ed Exponential Regressions: Estimation, Interpretation, and Average Marginal Effects," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0124, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    6. Haoge Chang, 2023. "Design-based Estimation Theory for Complex Experiments," Papers 2311.06891, arXiv.org.
    7. Liang Jiang & Oliver B. Linton & Haihan Tang & Yichong Zhang, 2022. "Improving Estimation Efficiency via Regression-Adjustment in Covariate-Adaptive Randomizations with Imperfect Compliance," Papers 2201.13004, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    8. John A. List & Ian Muir & Gregory K. Sun, 2022. "Using Machine Learning for Efficient Flexible Regression Adjustment in Economic Experiments," NBER Working Papers 30756, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Zhao, Anqi & Ding, Peng, 2021. "Covariate-adjusted Fisher randomization tests for the average treatment effect," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 278-294.
    10. Murshed, Muntasir & Apergis, Nicholas & Alam, Md Shabbir & Khan, Uzma & Mahmud, Sakib, 2022. "The impacts of renewable energy, financial inclusivity, globalization, economic growth, and urbanization on carbon productivity: Evidence from net moderation and mediation effects of energy efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 824-838.
    11. Max Cytrynbaum, 2023. "Covariate Adjustment in Stratified Experiments," Papers 2302.03687, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    12. Andrews Doeh Agblobi & Anthony Kofi Osei-Fosu & Hadrat Yusif, 2020. "Poverty Response to the Household Type of Elderly and Old-Age Pension," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Siddik, Abu Bakkar & Khan, Samiha & Khan, Uzma & Yong, Li & Murshed, Muntasir, 2023. "The role of renewable energy finance in achieving low-carbon growth: contextual evidence from leading renewable energy-investing countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:225-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.