IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v14y2026a11056.html

Mapping Euroscepticism Across Occupational Classes: Economic and Cultural Capital in Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Petrović

    (Department of Sociology, University of Zurich, Switzerland / Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Public attitudes towards the EU have fluctuated significantly over the past two decades, with Euroscepticism gaining ground across various national contexts. Previous research indicates that Euroscepticism is most prevalent among the working class and petty bourgeoisie. This article revisits this argument by exploring whether these class-based patterns persist across different national contexts and examining the role of cultural capital in shaping these divides. This study uses survey data from nine European countries to map occupational classes within a two-dimensional framework of cultural and economic capital, drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of social space and Oesch’s class scheme. Principal component analyses reveal that support for the EU aligns with class divisions, showing that sociocultural professionals tend to be strongly pro-EU, while production workers exhibit more Eurosceptic attitudes. Regression analyses confirm the significance of cultural capital, even within broadly Eurosceptic countries such as Serbia and Switzerland. These findings highlight the need to contextualize class-based explanations and to consider how cultural capital shapes EU attitudes across different national settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Petrović, 2026. "Mapping Euroscepticism Across Occupational Classes: Economic and Cultural Capital in Comparative Perspective," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11056
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.11056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11056
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.11056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deirdre N. McCloskey & Stephen T. Ziliak, 1996. "The Standard Error of Regressions," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 97-114, March.
    2. Lipset, Seymour Martin, 1959. "Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 69-105, March.
    3. José Real-Dato & Aleksandra Sojka, 2024. "The Rise of (Faulty) Euroscepticism? The Impact of a Decade of Crises in Spain," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 457-484, October.
    4. Wesley Eddings & Yulia Marchenko, 2012. "Diagnostics for multiple imputation in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 12(3), pages 353-367, September.
    5. Valentina Petrovic & Simon Walo & Jörg Rössel & Tally Katz‐Gerro & Maria Pilar Lopez Belbeze, 2025. "Perceptions of a Shared European Culture Increase the Support for the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 28-50, January.
    6. Jorge Díaz-Lanchas & Aleksandra Sojka & Filippo Di Pietro, 2021. "Of losers and laggards: the interplay of material conditions and individual perceptions in the shaping of EU discontent," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(3), pages 395-415.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergiu Mișcoiu & Sergiu Gherghina, 2026. "Consensus About the European Union? Understanding the Views of Citizens and Political Parties," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel G. Childers, 2011. "Being One'S Own Boss: How Does Risk Fit In?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 56(1), pages 48-58, May.
    2. Jian-Guang Shen, 2002. "Democracy and growth: An alternative empirical approach," Development and Comp Systems 0212002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. repec:rza:wpaper:029 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Torsten Persson & Guido Tabellini, 2009. "Democratic Capital: The Nexus of Political and Economic Change," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 88-126, July.
    5. Yong Glasure & Aie-Rie Lee & James Norris, 1999. "Level of economic development and political democracy revisited," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 5(4), pages 466-477, November.
    6. Emilia Justyna Powell & Steven Christian McDowell & Robert O’Brien & Julia Oksasoglu, 2021. "Islam-based legal language and state governance: democracy, strength of the judiciary and human rights," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 376-412, September.
    7. Pauline Grosjean & Claudia Senik, 2011. "Democracy, Market Liberalization, and Political Preferences," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(1), pages 365-381, February.
    8. Annette N. Brown & Drew B. Cameron & Benjamin D. K. Wood, 2014. "Quality evidence for policymaking: I'll believe it when I see the replication," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 215-235, September.
    9. Pettersson, Jan, 2003. "Democracy, Consolidation and Growth," Research Papers in Economics 2002:16, Stockholm University, Department of Economics, revised 15 Dec 2004.
    10. Ruiz Pozuelo, Julia & Slipowitz, Amy & Vuletin, Guillermo, 2016. "Democracy Does Not Cause Growth: The Importance of Endogeneity Arguments," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 7758, Inter-American Development Bank.
    11. Brinig, Margaret F. & Nock, Steven L., 2003. ""I only want trust": norms, trust, and autonomy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 471-487, November.
    12. Adrian Tschoegl, 1996. "Country and Firm Sources of International Competitiveness: The Case of the Foreign Exchange Market," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 97-19, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    13. repec:aen:journl:33-1-a04 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia & Livio Ferrante & Domenico Lisi, 2024. "The Quality of Regional Institutional Context and Museum Service Provision: Evidence from Italy," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 10(1), pages 155-195, March.
    15. Leandro Prados de la Escosura, 2023. "Inequality Beyond GDP: A Long View," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(3), pages 533-554, September.
    16. Mario COCCIA, 2020. "How does institutional change of democratization affect the origin and diffusion of technological innovation across countries?," Journal of Economic and Social Thought, EconSciences Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 60-91, June.
    17. Daron Acemoglu & Tuomas Pekkarinen & Kjell G Salvanes & Matti Sarvimäki, 2025. "The Making of Social Democracy: the Economic and Electoral Consequences of Norway’s 1936 Folk School Reform," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 119-158.
    18. Steven Kachelmeier & Kristy Towry, 2005. "The Limitations of Experimental Design: A Case Study Involving Monetary Incentive Effects in Laboratory Markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 8(1), pages 21-33, April.
    19. Tunahan Haciimamoglu & Oguzhan Sungur & Korkmaz Yildirim & Mustafa Yapar, 2025. "Rethinking the Climate Change–Inequality Nexus: The Role of Wealth Inequality, Economic Growth, and Renewable Energy in CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Mark Gradstein & Branko Milanovic, 2004. "Does Libertè = Egalité? A Survey of the Empirical Links between Democracy and Inequality with Some Evidence on the Transition Economies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 515-537, September.
    21. Shashi Kant Srivastava & Verma Deepika Chandra & Srinivas Jangirala & Janardan Krishna Yadav, 2024. "The Genesis of the Crypto-economy: Application of the Institutional Theory," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 49(3), pages 244-256, September.
    22. Anna Gdakowicz & Malgorzata Guzowska & Marta Hozer-Koćmiel & Leszek Gracz, 2023. "Gender Equality and Economic Growth in BSR and EAP Countries: A Quantitative Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 354-378.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.