IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v14y2026a11959.html

Consensus About the European Union? Understanding the Views of Citizens and Political Parties

Author

Listed:
  • Sergiu Mișcoiu

    (Department of European Studies, Babeș‐Bolyai University, Romania)

  • Sergiu Gherghina

    (Department of International Studies and Contemporary History, Babeș‐Bolyai University, Romania / Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Glasgow, Scotland)

Abstract

This thematic issue provides evidence that reflects some recent developments in the study of consensus toward the EU. It analyses to what extent citizens and political parties share a consensus about the EU and how this consensus is manifested, constituted, and mobilized. The thematic issue makes two contributions to the literature: it maps the contours of consensus and disagreement across EU member states and candidate countries and explains the degree of convergence in people’s attitudes and party positions about key European values, principles, and practices. All these show that consensus on the EU is a dynamic, multi-level process, contingent on institutional contexts, political competition, socio-economic conditions, and identity politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergiu Mișcoiu & Sergiu Gherghina, 2026. "Consensus About the European Union? Understanding the Views of Citizens and Political Parties," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11959
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.11959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11959
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.11959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arne Niemann & Natascha Zaun, 2018. "EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 3-22, January.
    2. Andrew Moravcsik, 1993. "Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 473-524, December.
    3. Reinhard Heinisch & Duncan McDonnell & Annika Werner, 2021. "Equivocal Euroscepticism: How Populist Radical Right Parties Can Have Their EU Cake and Eat It," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 189-205, March.
    4. Roula Nezi & Zoe Lefkofridi, 2026. "Multidimensional Representation in the EU Multilevel Polity: The Role of Congruence in Vote‐Switching," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    5. Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary, 2009. "A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Andrea Capati & Federico Trastulli, 2026. "Large‐Scale Crises and Variation in Social Democratic Europeanism: The Italian Democratic Party," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    7. Levan Kakhishvili & Alina Jasmin Felder-Stindt, 2026. "Geopolitical Crises and Consensus in the European Parliament: Initial Response to the War in Ukraine," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    8. Norbert Kersting & Lukas Schütte & Michele Scotto di Vettimo & Sven Lange & Jack Thompson & Francesco Ruggeri & Roberta di Stefano & Roan Buma & Vladimir Cristea & Lorenza Antonucci & André Krouwel & , 2026. "Citizens’ Trust in the European Union During Crisis and Conflicts Across 10 Countries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    9. Valentina Petrović, 2026. "Mapping Euroscepticism Across Occupational Classes: Economic and Cultural Capital in Comparative Perspective," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks, 2015. "Delegation and pooling in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 305-328, September.
    2. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    3. Halmai, Péter, 2024. "Mélyintegráció-paradigma [Deep-integration Paradigm]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 514-558.
    4. Maria Chiara Vinciguerra, 2021. "Punching Below Its Weight: The Role of the European Parliament in Politicised Consultation Procedures," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 29-39.
    5. Ulrich Krotz & Lucas Schramm, 2022. "Embedded Bilateralism, Integration Theory, and European Crisis Politics: France, Germany, and the Birth of the EU Corona Recovery Fund," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 526-544, May.
    6. Danilo Di Mauro & Vincenzo Memoli, 2021. "The Role of Public Opinion in EU Integration: Assessing the Relationship between Elites and the Public during the Refugee Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1303-1321, September.
    7. Christian Schweiger, 2021. "Parliamentary Scrutiny of the European Semester: The Case of Poland," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 124-134.
    8. Patrick Bijsmans, 2024. "European Parliament Elections in the Dutch Press and the Mainstreaming of Euroscepticism: Outsiders Becoming Insiders?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1141-1158, September.
    9. Christian Schweiger, 2021. "Parliamentary Scrutiny of the European Semester: The Case of Poland," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 124-134.
    10. Schirm Stefan A., 2018. "The Domestic Politics of European Preferences Towards Global Economic Governance," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 303-324, December.
    11. Lisanne de Blok & Max Heermann & Julian Schuessler & Dirk Leuffen & Catherine E. de Vries, 2024. "All on board? The role of institutional design for public support for differentiated integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 593-604, September.
    12. Julian Aichholzer & Sylvia Kritzinger & Carolina Plescia, 2021. "National identity profiles and support for the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(2), pages 293-315, June.
    13. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile internet and the rise of political tribalism in Europe," CEP Discussion Papers dp1877, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Luuk Middelaar, 2016. "The Return of Politics – The European Union after the crises in the eurozone and Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 495-507, May.
    15. Soetkin Verhaegen & Marc Hooghe & Ellen Quintelier, 2014. "European Identity and Support for European Integration: A Matter of Perceived Economic Benefits?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 295-314, May.
    16. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:483-506 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Wolfram Kaiser, 2017. "Limits of Cultural Engineering: Actors and Narratives in the European Parliament's House of European History Project," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 518-534, May.
    18. Natascha Zaun & Ariadna Ripoll Servent, 2023. "Perpetuating Crisis as a Supply Strategy: The Role of (Nativist) Populist Governments in EU Policymaking on Refugee Distribution," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 653-672, May.
    19. Rauh, Christian, 2015. "Communicating supranational governance? The salience of EU affairs in the German Bundestag, 1991–2013," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 116-138.
    20. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-01019642, HAL.
    21. Mikko Mattila & Tapio Raunio, 2026. "Still Out of Touch? Parties and Their Voters on the EU Dimension," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.