IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v14y2026a10589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Invisible Architects of Public Engagement: Understanding the Different Types of Roles Played by Parliamentary Staff

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Serra-Silva

    (Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Cristina Leston-Bandeira

    (School of Politics and International Studies, University of Leeds, UK)

Abstract

. Although public engagement has become a cornerstone of modern parliamentary functions, the role of parliamentary staff in shaping it remains largely neglected and understudied. Whilst the literature acknowledges that staff have been key in the development of public engagement in legislatures, we do not know in what ways. This oversight neglects a crucial aspect: the administration of parliament is not just a backdrop but the very foundation of a functioning parliament, being particularly noticeable and significant within the realm of public engagement, as a relatively recent activity for parliaments beyond their traditional functions of legislation, scrutiny and representation. This paper addresses this gap by uncovering the hidden contributions of parliamentary staff in the development of public engagement strategies. We adopt an interpretive qualitative research approach, drawing on 37 semi-structured elite interviews with officials and MPs of the Parliaments of Austria, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. Through thematic analysis, we develop a novel typology that identifies six roles staff play in parliamentary public engagement: Institutional Innovator, Knowledge Facilitator, Strategic Decision-Maker & Coordinator, Guarantor of Institutional Legitimacy, Operational Manager and Evaluator & Monitor. Crucially, we also explore the enabling and constraining factors — from political will and institutional structure to administrative resources — which shape how these roles are enacted. Our analysis shows the pivotal part these six roles play in navigating the complex interplay between the political and the non-political dimensions of a parliamentary setting, which have been crucial to push forward the agenda of public engagement within legislatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Serra-Silva & Cristina Leston-Bandeira, 2026. "The Invisible Architects of Public Engagement: Understanding the Different Types of Roles Played by Parliamentary Staff," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:10589
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.10589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10589
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.10589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaufman, Herbert, 1956. "Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 1057-1073, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Marsden, 2009. "The Paradox of Performance Related Pay Systems: 'Why Do We Keep Adopting Them in the Face of Evidence that they Fail to Motivate?'," CEP Discussion Papers dp0946, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Bong Hwan Kim & Sounman Hong, 2019. "Political change and turnovers: How do political principals consider organizational, individual, and performance information?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 291-308, December.
    3. Huijuan Zhang & William B. Eimicke, 2024. "In the Pursuit of the Balance between Efficiency and Responsiveness: A Case Study on the Innovation of the administrative Service Organization in Chinese Local Government," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 201-216, March.
    4. David A. Reingold, 2008. "Can government-supported evaluation and policy research be independent?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 934-941.
    5. Sidney M. Milkis, 2024. "Franklin Roosevelt, the “Third New Deal,” and the transformation of partisanship," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(3), pages 500-513, May.
    6. Ugur Omurgonulsen & M. Oktem, 2009. "Is There Any Change in the Public Service Values of Different Generations of Public Administrators? The Case of Turkish Governors and District Governors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 137-156, August.
    7. Viola Burau & Lotte Bøgh Andersen, 2014. "Professions and Professionals: Capturing the Changing Role of Expertise Through Theoretical Triangulation," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 264-293, January.
    8. Sounman Hong & Taek Kyu Kim, 2017. "Regulatory capture in agency performance evaluation: industry expertise versus revolving-door lobbying," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 167-186, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:10589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.