IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/ocesoc/v2y2025a9809.html

The Ocean & Society Survey: A Global Tool for Understanding People–Ocean Connections and Mobilizing Ocean Action

Author

Listed:
  • Jen McRuer

    (Canadian Ocean Literacy Coalition, Dalhousie University, Canada)

  • Diz L. Glithero

    (Canadian Ocean Literacy Coalition, Dalhousie University, Canada)

  • Emma McKinley

    (School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff University, UK)

  • Jordi F. Pagès

    (Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Spain)

  • Géraldine Fauville

    (Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Elisabeth S. Morris-Webb

    (Nordland Research Institute, Norway)

  • Natalie Hart

    (Insight and Strategy Unit, Communications INC, UK)

  • Craig Strang

    (Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley, USA)

  • Ronaldo Christofoletti

    (Institute of Marine Science, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil)

  • Sophie Hulme

    (Communications INC, UK)

  • Elliot Grainger

    (Insight and Strategy Unit, Communications INC, UK)

  • Bárbara Pinheiro

    (Institute of Marine Science, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil)

  • Diana L. Payne

    (Connecticut Sea Grant, University of Connecticut, USA / National Marine Educators Association, USA)

  • Nicola Bridge

    (Ocean Advocacy and Engagement, Ocean Conservation Trust, UK)

  • Vinicius Lindoso

    (Research for Purpose, Brazil)

  • Ivan Machado Martins

    (Institute of Marine Science, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil)

  • David Zandvliet

    (Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Canada)

  • Marilia Bueno Fernandes

    (Institute of Marine Science, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil)

  • Janaina Bumbeer

    (Boticario Group Foundation, Brazil)

  • Rebecca Shellock

    (Centre for Sustainable Development Reform, University of New South Wales, Australia)

Abstract

Recent years have seen calls for improved ways of assessing and understanding ocean literacy across a range of contexts. This article presents collaborative advances toward these ends on a global scale, through the co-creation of the Ocean & Society Survey. This Survey—based on national surveys in Canada, Brazil, and the UK—and the collaboration of 20 core partners, aims to capture diverse people–ocean connections. The article outlines the Ocean & Society Survey’s objectives to: (a) strengthen people–ocean relationships by exploring how people understand, value, and/or engage with the ocean; (b) guide pathways of engagement by identifying behavioural motivations, barriers, and enablers; (c) generate insights to inform targeted, audience-specific ocean communications campaigns; (d) demonstrate the value of transdisciplinary partnerships; and (e) better understand what influences peoples’ interests and concerns about the ocean, alongside the willingness and capacity to take action and make informed decisions. The article presents the co-design process of the global tool. In particular, it outlines the analytical approach using thematic, dimensional, and metric indices to compile a question set that can be used to achieve the above objectives by comparing public ocean perceptions over time and across regions. It discusses processes of external review, piloting, and launch in the lead-up to the third UN Ocean Conference, and the projected trajectory until 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Jen McRuer & Diz L. Glithero & Emma McKinley & Jordi F. Pagès & Géraldine Fauville & Elisabeth S. Morris-Webb & Natalie Hart & Craig Strang & Ronaldo Christofoletti & Sophie Hulme & Elliot Grainger & , 2025. "The Ocean & Society Survey: A Global Tool for Understanding People–Ocean Connections and Mobilizing Ocean Action," Ocean and Society, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:ocesoc:v2:y:2025:a:9809
    DOI: 10.17645/oas.9809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/oceanandsociety/article/view/9809
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/oas.9809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelly Levin & Benjamin Cashore & Steven Bernstein & Graeme Auld, 2012. "Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(2), pages 123-152, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalie Slawinski & Jonatan Pinkse & Timo Busch & Subhabrata Bobby Banerjeed, 2014. "The role of short-termism and uncertainty in organizational inaction on climate change: multilevel framework," Working Papers hal-00961226, HAL.
    2. Anmol Soni & Justina Jose & Gordon A. Kingsley, 2023. "When cities take control: Explaining the diversity of complex local climate actions," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1026-1057, November.
    3. Kai Greenlees & Randolph Cornelius, 2021. "The promise of panarchy in managed retreat: converging psychological perspectives and complex adaptive systems theory," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 503-510, September.
    4. Vincent Wretling & Berit Balfors, 2021. "Building Institutional Capacity to Plan for Climate Neutrality: The Role of Local Co-Operation and Inter-Municipal Networks at the Regional Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Hamish van der Ven & Yixian Sun, 2021. "Varieties of Crises: Comparing the Politics of COVID-19 and Climate Change," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 13-22, Winter.
    6. Sandra Waddock, 2019. "Shaping the Shift: Shamanic Leadership, Memes, and Transformation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 931-939, April.
    7. Carol Hager & Nicole Hamagami, 2020. "Local Renewable Energy Initiatives in Germany and Japan in a Changing National Policy Environment," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(3), pages 386-411, May.
    8. Debra Javeline & Tracy Kijewski-Correa & Angela Chesler, 2019. "Does it matter if you “believe” in climate change? Not for coastal home vulnerability," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 511-532, August.
    9. Mirjam Braßler & Martin Schultze, 2021. "Students’ Innovation in Education for Sustainable Development—A Longitudinal Study on Interdisciplinary vs. Monodisciplinary Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Yoon‐Hee Ha & John Byrne, 2019. "The rise and fall of green growth: Korea's energy sector experiment and its lessons for sustainable energy policy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(4), July.
    11. Landon Yoder & Alora Cain & Ananya Rao & Nathaniel Geiger & Ben Kravitz & Mack Mercer & Deidra Miniard & Sangeet Nepal & Thomas Nunn & Mary Sluder & Grace Weiler & Shahzeen Z. Attari, 2024. "Muddling through Climate Change: A Qualitative Exploration of India and U.S. Climate Experts’ Perspectives on Solutions, Pathways, and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.
    12. John C. Boik, 2016. "Optimality of Social Choice Systems: Complexity, Wisdom, and Wellbeing Centrality," Working Paper 0005, Principled Societies Project, revised Mar 2017.
    13. Ana Luiza Fontenelle & Erik Nilsson & Ieda Geriberto Hidalgo & Cintia B. Uvo & Drielli Peyerl, 2022. "Temporal Understanding of the Water–Energy Nexus: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Wim Lambrechts & Andrew Mitchell & Mark Lemon & Muhammad Usman Mazhar & Ward Ooms & Rikkert van Heerde, 2021. "The Transition of Dutch Social Housing Corporations to Sustainable Business Models for New Buildings and Retrofits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Frans Sengers & Bruno Turnheim & Frans Berkhout, 2021. "Beyond experiments: Embedding outcomes in climate governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1148-1171, September.
    16. Hurford, A.P. & Harou, J.J. & Bonzanigo, L. & Ray, P.A. & Karki, P. & Bharati, L. & Chinnasamy, P., 2020. "Efficient and robust hydropower system design under uncertainty - A demonstration in Nepal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Kreitmair, Ursula & Bower-Bir, Jacob, 2021. "Too different to solve climate change? Experimental evidence on the effects of production and benefit heterogeneity on collective action," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. repec:osf:socarx:4nhxk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Andrew S. Mitchell & Mark Lemon & Wim Lambrechts, 2020. "Learning from the Anthropocene: Adaptive Epistemology and Complexity in Strategic Managerial Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Marcellus Forh Mbah & Chidi Ezegwu, 2024. "The Decolonisation of Climate Change and Environmental Education in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, April.
    21. Dino Pitoski & Thomas J. Lampoltshammer & Peter Parycek, 2021. "Drivers of Human Migration: A Review of Scientific Evidence," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:ocesoc:v2:y:2025:a:9809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.