IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2025v4p376-379.html

The Impact Of Drone Technology On Social Development

Author

Listed:
  • STAN RAZVAN STEFAN

Abstract

This paper looks at how drone technology can be used not only as a tool for innovation but also as a practical driver for social and economic change in rural areas. The discussion is built around a planned educational project in Horezu, Romania, scheduled to start in late August 2025. Using a qualitative approach, I combine what we know from literature with a projection of the likely local impact. Although the project is still in preparation, the anticipated results show that drones could provide communities with both new skills and real opportunities — if certain conditions are met. These results are consistent with previous findings on technology-driven rural innovation (Popescu, 2022), which underline that the adoption of emerging technologies requires both educational initiatives and institutional support. The programme has clear replication potential. For successful scaling, several conditions are necessary: the presence of an educational institution or NGO willing to coordinate, access to a minimum of 5–10 drones, and the availability of a trained facilitator. The estimated minimum resources include a budget of approximately €5,000–7,000 for equipment and materials. However, the curriculum and activities must be adapted to the specific context of each community – for instance, focusing on agricultural monitoring in farming regions, or cultural heritage promotion in areas with tourism potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Stan Razvan Stefan, 2025. "The Impact Of Drone Technology On Social Development," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 366-379, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:4:p:376-379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2025-04/40_Stan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rao, Bharat & Gopi, Ashwin Goutham & Maione, Romana, 2016. "The societal impact of commercial drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 83-90.
    2. Pol, Eduardo & Ville, Simon, 2009. "Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 878-885, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Bragaglia, 2024. "The University and the Neighbourhood—Opportunities and Limits in Promoting Social Innovation: The Case of AuroraLAB in Turin (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. E Sormani & K Uude, 2022. "Academics’ prosocial motivation for engagement with society: The case of German academics in health science [Why Do Academics Engage Locally? Insights from the University of Stavanger]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 962-971.
    3. Mendoza, Mario A. & Rodriguez Alfonso, Mauricio & Lhuillery, Stephane, 2021. "A battle of drones: Utilizing legitimacy strategies for the transfer and diffusion of dual-use technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Jacek Buko & Marek Bulsa & Adam Makowski, 2022. "Spatial Premises and Key Conditions for the Use of UAVs for Delivery of Items on the Example of the Polish Courier and Postal Services Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Dionisio, Marcelo & de Vargas, Eduardo Raupp, 2022. "Integrating Corporate Social Innovations and cross-collaboration: An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 794-803.
    7. Jørgensen, Matias Thuen & Hansen, Anne Vorre & Sørensen, Flemming & Fuglsang, Lars & Sundbo, Jon & Jensen, Jens Friis, 2021. "Collective tourism social entrepreneurship: A means for community mobilization and social transformation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    9. Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2018. "Short-Term Wind Electric Power Forecasting Using a Novel Multi-Stage Intelligent Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Sriroop Chaudhuri & Mimi Roy & Louis M. McDonald & Yves Emendack, 2021. "Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2973-3008, March.
    11. Raquel Francisco Mafra & Jacir Leonir Casagrande & Ana Regina de Aguiar Dutra & Nei Antonio Nunes & Felipe Texeira Dias & Samuel Borges Barbosa & José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, 2024. "Social Innovation as a Support for the Visibility of Vulnerable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Novikova Marina & de Fátima Ferreiro Maria & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Local Development Initiatives as Promoters of Social Innovation: Evidence from Two European Rural Regions," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 43-53, June.
    13. Paola M. A. Paniccia & Luna Leoni & Silvia Baiocco, 2017. "Interpreting Sustainability through Co-Evolution: Evidence from Religious Accommodations in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Niftiyev, Ibrahim, 2022. "The Role of Public Spending and The Quality of Public Services in E-government Development," EconStor Conference Papers 256899, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    15. repec:eur:ejserj:467 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Noor, Nur Hanis Mohamad & Ng, Boon-Kwee & Hamid, Mohd Johaary Abdul, 2020. "Forging researchers-farmers partnership in public social innovation: a case study of Malaysia’s agro-based public research institution," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    17. Rosalia Diaz-Carrion & Noelia Franco-Leal, 2022. "Social and strategic innovation: extending the varieties of capitalism to asian countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1453-1474, December.
    18. Barbara Scozzi & Nicola Bellantuono & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2017. "Managing Open Innovation in Urban Labs," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 857-874, September.
    19. Paul Windrum & Doris Schartinger & Luis Rubalcaba & Faiz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2016. "The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 150-166, May.
    20. Ivana Živojinović & Alice Ludvig & Karl Hogl, 2019. "Social Innovation to Sustain Rural Communities: Overcoming Institutional Challenges in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    21. Yao Lu, 2025. "A systematic literature review on social innovation for sustainable development in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(12), pages 29235-29262, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:4:p:376-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.