IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2020v5p247-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Romania’Sbioeconomy In The Context Of Eu Development Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • ANDREEA CIRSTEA

    (BABES-BOLYAI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, CLUJ-NAPOCA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Bioeconomy is one of the economic sectors to which significant attention is paid in the development strategies at EU level. This sector can be a key factor in reachingthe strategic goals for climate change and sustainable consumption. This paper aims to create an overview of the Romania bioeconomy sectorand to emphasize the development of the sector in relation with EU bioeconomy. To measure the development of the sector three relevant indicators were chosen: people employed in the sector, turnover and value added of the bioeconomy. The period selected for the study of the indicators was 2008-2017. The main findings of the research highlight that, at EU level, bioeconomy sector is continuously increasing for the selected period regarding all indicators. For Romania was observed a slight decrease of the indicators. Despite that Romania can be considered one of the most important European countries in the context of the people employed in bioeconomy. Agriculture was identified as the main industry in terms of people employed and value added for Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreea Cirstea, 2020. "Measuring Romania’Sbioeconomy In The Context Of Eu Development Strategy," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 247-256, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:5:p:247-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2020-05/29_andreea_Cirstea.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefania Bracco & Ozgul Calicioglu & Marta Gomez San Juan & Alessandro Flammini, 2018. "Assessing the Contribution of Bioeconomy to the Total Economy: A Review of National Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balan Emilia Mary, 2022. "Where Is Romania In The European Union’S Bioeconomic Context? The Cluster Analyses Approach," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 172-184, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2025. "Navigating the Bioeconomy: Using Delphi-SWOT to Build Robust Strategies for Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Britz, Wolfgang & Li, Jingwen & Shang, Linmei, 2021. "Combining large-scale sensitivity analysis in Computable General Equilibrium models with Machine Learning: An Example Application to policy supporting the bio-economy," Conference papers 333285, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Ozgul Calicioglu & Alessandro Flammini & Stefania Bracco & Lorenzo Bellù & Ralph Sims, 2019. "The Future Challenges of Food and Agriculture: An Integrated Analysis of Trends and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Tina Highfill & Matthew Chambers, 2023. "Developing a National Measure of the Economic Contributions of the Bioeconomy," BEA Working Papers 0206, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    5. Stefano Bertacchi & Stefania Pagliari & Chiara Cantù & Ilaria Bruni & Massimo Labra & Paola Branduardi, 2021. "Enzymatic Hydrolysate of Cinnamon Waste Material as Feedstock for the Microbial Production of Carotenoids," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Maximilian Kardung & Kutay Cingiz & Ortwin Costenoble & Roel Delahaye & Wim Heijman & Marko Lovrić & Myrna van Leeuwen & Robert M’Barek & Hans van Meijl & Stephan Piotrowski & Tévécia Ronzon & Johanne, 2021. "Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Annie Dimitrova & Atanas Pavlov, 2024. "Animal and Vegetal Waste Generated by EU Member States in the Period 2016 – 2020," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 241-256.
    8. Xun Wei & Jie Luo & Aqing Pu & Qianqian Liu & Lei Zhang & Suowei Wu & Yan Long & Yan Leng & Zhenying Dong & Xiangyuan Wan, 2022. "From Biotechnology to Bioeconomy: A Review of Development Dynamics and Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Tévécia Ronzon & Stephan Piotrowski & Saulius Tamosiunas & Lara Dammer & Michael Carus & Robert M’barek, 2020. "Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Balan Emilia Mary, 2022. "Where Is Romania In The European Union’S Bioeconomic Context? The Cluster Analyses Approach," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 172-184, February.
    11. Asada, Raphael & Cardellini, Giuseppe & Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia & Wenger, Julia & Haas, Verena & Holzer, Daniel & Stern, Tobias, 2020. "Effective bioeconomy? a MRIO-based socioeconomic and environmental impact assessment of generic sectoral innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Piergiuseppe Morone & Paolo Rosa & Claudio Sassanelli & Davide Settembre-Blundo & Yichen Shen, 2021. "Bioeconomy of Sustainability: Drivers, Opportunities and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-7, December.
    13. Liobikiene, Genovaite & Chen, Xueli & Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2020. "The trends in bioeconomy development in the European Union: Exploiting capacity and productivity measures based on the land footprint approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Liu, Yang & Huang, Yihan, 2024. "Assessing the interrelationship between fossil fuels resources and the biomass energy market for achieving a sustainable and green economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Florian Siekmann & Sandra Venghaus, 2024. "Regional transformation pathways for the bioeconomy: A novel monitoring approach for complex transitions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 603-616, June.
    16. How, Bing Shen & Ngan, Sue Lin & Hong, Boon Hooi & Lam, Hon Loong & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin & Yusup, Suzana & Ghani, Wan Azlina Wan Abd Karim & Kansha, Yasuki & Chan, Yi Herng & Cheah, Kin Wai & Shahbaz, Mu, 2019. "An outlook of Malaysian biomass industry commercialisation: Perspectives and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Mauricio Alviar & Andrés García-Suaza & Laura Ramírez-Gómez & Simón Villegas-Velásquez, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the Bioeconomy: The Case of Colombia and Antioquia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Florian MARIN, 2020. "Collective Agreement - A Tool For Strengthening Public Policies In The Area Of Social Responsibility," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 41-60, March.
    19. Debesh Mishra & Kamalakanta Muduli & Lukas Sevcik & Sujoy Kumar Jana & Manidatta Ray, 2023. "Combating of Associated Issues for Sustainable Agri-Food Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Marios Trigkas & Glykeria Karagouni, 2023. "State/Academia Key Stakeholders’ Perceptions Regarding Bioeconomy: Evidence from Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:5:p:247-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.