IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2015vspecialp488-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Value Added And Market Value Added - Modern Indicators For Assessment The Firm’S Value

Author

Listed:
  • NICOLAE SICHIGEA

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA)

  • LAURA VASILESCU

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA)

Abstract

The financial theory developed different categories of indicators - traditional and modern - in order to evaluate the firm’s value creation. The shareholders are directly interested by the value added in the company. The value creation is a complex process that implies correct decisions, common responsibility (managers and shareholders) and actions towards an efficient and profitable activity. The traditional indicators of performance are not teoritically correlated with the the value creation and in these circumstances, should be used appropriate financial indicators in order to reflect the value of the company. Therefore, the modern indicators used in the value based management framework offer a greater flexibility and efficiency and represent a good alternative for companies. Such performance indicators used to measure the financial results correlated with shareholder wealth are the Economic Value Added (EVA), as a measure of internal performance and the Market Value Added (MVA) as a measure of external performance of the company. Starting from the main deficiencies of the accounting indicators, the objective of this this study is to present the relationship between EVA and MVA and their implications on firms’valuation. Thus, the presentation and analysis of these indicators – EVA and MVA - will underline the main features, their correlations, and influence factors but also the main advantage and disadvantage of each indicator, which will enable the managers to make the correct choice and subsequently the best decision regarding the performance measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolae Sichigea & Laura Vasilescu, 2015. "Economic Value Added And Market Value Added - Modern Indicators For Assessment The Firm’S Value," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0, pages 488-493, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2015:v:special:p:488-493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2015-Special%20ECOTREND/81_Sighicea,%20Vasilescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verrecchia, Robert E., 1986. "Managerial discretion in the choice among financial reporting alternatives," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 175-195, October.
    2. Laura VASILESCU & Ana POPA, 2011. "Economic Value Added: Pros and Cons," Finante - provocarile viitorului (Finance - Challenges of the Future), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(13), pages 60-65, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. LUCUȚ CAPRAȘ Isabella & RUS Alexandra Ioana Daniela & ACHIM Monica Violeta, 2023. "The Impact of Corporate Governance on Intellectual Capital. Empirical Evidence from Romanian Companies," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    2. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolae Sichigea & Laura Vasilescu, 2015. "Economic Value Added And Market Value Added - Modern Indicators For Assessment The Firm’S Value," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 488-493, December.
    2. Hutchinson, Marion & Gul, Ferdinand A., 2004. "Investment opportunity set, corporate governance practices and firm performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 595-614, September.
    3. Elitzur, R. Ramy & Yaari, Varda, 1995. "Executive incentive compensation and earnings manipulation in a multi-period setting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 201-219, March.
    4. Bracha Meth, 1996. "Reduction of Outcome Variance: Optimality and Incentives," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 309-328, March.
    5. Miron Vasile Cristian Ioachim & Focsan Eleonora Ionela, 2017. "The Analysis Of The Performance Of Companies Based On The Economic Value Added," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 181-190, February.
    6. Joel S. Demski, 1998. "Performance Measure Manipulation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 261-285, September.
    7. Jeffery Abarbanell & Reuven Lehavy, 2003. "Can Stock Recommendations Predict Earnings Management and Analysts’ Earnings Forecast Errors?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 1-31, March.
    8. De Waegenaere, A.M.B. & Wielhouwer, J.L., 2008. "On the Effects of the Degree of Discretion in Reporting Managerial performance," Discussion Paper 2008-21, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    9. Dieter Pfaff & Oliver Bärtl, 1998. "Externe Rechnungslegung, internes Rechnungswesen und Kapitalmarkt," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 50(9), pages 757-777, September.
    10. Daraban Marius Costin, 2017. "Economic Value Added – A General Review of the Concept," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 168-173, June.
    11. Ermans, C.J.C., 1996. "Financial Disclosure : A Closer Look," Research Memorandum 722, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Baiman, Stanley & Verrecchia, Robert E., 1995. "Earnings and price-based compensation contracts in the presence of discretionary trading and incomplete contracting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 93-121, July.
    13. Hutchinson, Marion & A Gul, Ferdinand, 2006. "The effects of executive share options and investment opportunities on firms’ accounting performance: Some Australian evidence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 277-297.
    14. Stewart C. Myers, 1989. "Signaling and Accounting Information," NBER Working Papers 3193, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. De Waegenaere, A.M.B. & Wielhouwer, J.L., 2008. "On the Effects of the Degree of Discretion in Reporting Managerial performance," Other publications TiSEM 7251fe36-f257-46bc-8185-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Bonsall, Samuel B., 2014. "The impact of issuer-pay on corporate bond rating properties: Evidence from Moody׳s and S&P׳s initial adoptions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 89-109.
    17. Pascal Frantz, 1999. "Discretionary write-downs, write-offs, and other restructuring provisions: a signaling approach," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 109-121.
    18. Lambert, Richard A., 2001. "Contracting theory and accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 3-87, December.
    19. Randolph P. Beatty & Robert E. Verrecchia, 1989. "The effect of a mandated accounting change on the capitalization process," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 472-493, March.
    20. Christy FLORENCE & Yanuar Nanok SOENARNO, 2022. "Healthcare Companies Performance before and during Covid-19: Empirical Evidence from 150 companies in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 1-2, pages 91-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2015:v:special:p:488-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.