IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlrae/v70y2024i2id7-2023-rae.html

Location-specific technology transfer model in an agricultural technology park, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Harmi Andrianyta

    (Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia)

  • Elisa Anggraeni

    (Department of Agricultural industrial technology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia)

  • Sapta Raharja

    (Department of Agricultural industrial technology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia)

  • Sukardi Sukardi

    (Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia)

Abstract

Diversity in the characteristics of agricultural locations has the potential to develop. Unfortunately, the weak transfer of technology based on the characteristics of the location indicates that this potential cannot grow properly. This research aims to synthesise a technology transfer model for an agricultural technology park (ATP) by considering site-specific conditions. This cross-case study was conducted at selected ATP locations. Model synthesis uses the system development life cycle stages of initiation, analysis, and design. The resource-based view approach was broken down into several variables during the analysis stage. Three location-specific technology transfer models were successfully developed: a technology transfer model based on highland specificity, a unique technology transfer model for urban farming, and a tourism village-based model.

Suggested Citation

  • Harmi Andrianyta & Elisa Anggraeni & Sapta Raharja & Sukardi Sukardi, 2024. "Location-specific technology transfer model in an agricultural technology park, Indonesia," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 61-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:70:y:2024:i:2:id:7-2023-rae
    DOI: 10.17221/7/2023-RAE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/7/2023-RAE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/7/2023-RAE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lakitan, Benyamin, 2013. "Connecting all the dots: Identifying the “actor level” challenges in establishing effective innovation system in Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 41-54.
    2. Brennecke, Julia & Rank, Olaf, 2017. "The firm’s knowledge network and the transfer of advice among corporate inventors—A multilevel network study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 768-783.
    3. Bozeman, Barry & Rimes, Heather & Youtie, Jan, 2015. "The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 34-49.
    4. Lian, Xiangpeng & Guo, Ying & Su, Jun, 2021. "Technology stocks: A study on the characteristics that help transfer public research to industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    5. Alexandre Aparecido Dias & Geciane Silveira Porto, 2018. "Technology transfer management in the context of a developing country: evidence from Brazilian universities," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 525-536, October.
    6. Wonglimpiyarat, Jarunee, 2016. "The innovation incubator, university business incubator and technology transfer strategy: The case of Thailand," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 18-27.
    7. Jugend, Daniel & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappeta & Alves Scaliza, Janaina A. & Rocha, Robson Sø & Junior, José Alcides Gobbo & Latan, Hengky & Salgado, Manoel Henrique, 2018. "Relationships among open innovation, innovative performance, government support and firm size: Comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 54-65.
    8. Isabel Diez-Vial & Marta Fernández-Olmos, 2017. "The effect of science and technology parks on a firm’s performance: a dynamic approach over time," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 413-434, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lian, Xiangpeng & Zhang, Yi & Wu, Mengjia & Guo, Ying, 2025. "Do scientific knowledge flows inspire exploratory innovation? Evidence from US biomedical and life sciences firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Petra Maresova & Ruzena Stemberkova & Oluwaseun Fadeyi, 2019. "Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-36, September.
    3. Qi Fang & Hong-Ming Xie, 2023. "Configurations of Technology Commercialization: Evidence from Chinese Spin-off Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(3), pages 3453-3488, September.
    4. Jin, Qianqian & Chen, Hongshu & Wang, Xuefeng & Xiong, Fei, 2024. "How do network embeddedness and knowledge stock influence collaboration dynamics? Evidence from patents," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    5. Weiyu Duan & Ying Guo, 2024. "Focused or divided? Collaborative attention and technological orientations in technology transfer," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(3), pages 1441-1467, March.
    6. Ying Xong Thanongsack & Muhammad Kamil & Souvanhxay Paovangsa & Ke Xing, 2025. "The Effectiveness of Technology Transfer Within the China–Laos Economic Corridor on Industrial SME Performance: A Configurational Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    7. Liming Zhao & Haihong Zhang & Wenqing Wu, 2019. "Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 657-685, May.
    8. Jiang, Yongni & Yang, Pianpian & Zhang, Lu & Wang, Maotian, 2025. "Impact of green innovation openness and green innovation radicalness on firm performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Zhiping Hou & Benyue Liu & Shengyou Liu & Fangkun Liu, 2025. "How Does the Knowledge Association of Online Travel Reviews Affect Tourism Purchase Behavior? An Empirical Study Based on Knowledge Network Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 8221-8248, June.
    10. de Almeida, Liliane & Augusto de Jesus Pacheco, Diego & Caten, Carla Schwengber ten & Jung, Carlos Fernando, 2021. "A methodology for identifying results and impacts in technological innovation projects," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    12. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto Mick & João Luiz Kovaleski & Rui Tadashi Yoshino & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli, 2024. "The Influence Between Industry 4.0 and Technology Transfer: A Framework Based on Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    13. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    14. Mario BENASSI & Matteo LANDONI & Francesco RENTOCCHINI, 2017. "University Management Practices and Academic Spin-offs," Departmental Working Papers 2017-11, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    15. Cenamor, Javier, 2021. "Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 335-343.
    16. Mariana G. Andrade-Rojas & Terence J. V. Saldanha & Abhishek Kathuria & Jiban Khuntia & Waifong Boh, 2024. "How Information Technology Overcomes Deficiencies for Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Closed Innovation vs. Open Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1981-2012, December.
    17. Ioanna Kastelli & Aggelos Tsakanikas & Yannis Caloghirou, 2018. "Technology transfer as a mechanism for dynamic transformation in the food sector," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 882-900, August.
    18. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Musioł-Urbańczyk, Anna & Podgórska, Marzena & Wolny, Maciej, 2021. "Does motivation matter in evaluation of research institutions? Evidence from Polish public universities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Hoppmann, Joern, 2021. "Hand in hand to Nowhereland? How the resource dependence of research institutes influences their co-evolution with industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    20. Hong Jiang & Wentao Liu & Lili Jia, 2019. "How Humble Leadership Influences the Innovation of Technology Standards: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:70:y:2024:i:2:id:7-2023-rae. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.