OPEC in the Epoch of Globalization: An Event Study of Global Oil Prices
This article confirms that OPEC is neither a cartel nor exhibits any sign of market domination, market control, or monopoly. This confirmation is also in accord with the pioneering account of the competitive differential oil rents formed across the global industry since the crises of the 1970s. The methodology utilized in this study is known as the event-study, an innovative econometric method which attempts to investigate the possible influence of OPEC decisions on output upon the global oil spot and futures prices during the period of 1983-2005. The significance of this investigation is due to the fact that the apparent ``lumpiness" of OPEC has to have no bearing on a priori acceptance of ``perfect competition" as opposed to ``imperfect competition"a tautological hallmark of neoclassical theory utilized in the bulk of both orthodox and heterodox literature on oil. And, by implication, neither has the neoclassical parlance of rent, as ``market imperfection" and/or ``market power," any bearing on the globally competitive differential oil rents earned by the rentier states. OPEC is reflective of the competitive differential oil rents earned by its members; and, contrary to both the right and the left, and their obfuscating echo in the media, it rolls with the heavy-handed punches of global market in the present epoch. This study is rather a posteriori investigation that deals with the reality of competition in the Schumpeterian frameworka reality that, far from the fiction of textbook competition, is neither perfect nor imperfect.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 7 (2007)
Issue (Month): 1 (February)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://www.degruyter.com|
|Order Information:||Web: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/gej|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:glecon:v:7:y:2007:i:1:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.