IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boi/isrerv/v18y2020i1p47-58.html

Beliefs, Expectations, And Behavior In The Time Of Corona

Author

Listed:
  • Ori Heffetz

    (Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

Abstract

In this lecture, I cover several subjects that behavioral economists and psychologists have been mentioning recently as relevant to our topic. I warn in advance that we understand some of them better than we do others. For some we have slightly more persuasive findings than for others, so far. And in other cases, the research is in its infancy or has to date yielded mixed findings. I do not attempt to be comprehensive; I focus on those subjects closest to my own research interests. I also do not present a laundry list of do’s and don’ts; instead, what follows are interesting findings that should give us all food for thought. The first part of the lecture addresses several important phenomena that have been studied in the world of behavioral economics—and their possible manifestations in the time of corona. It begins with a brief discussion of what behavioral economics is and continues by offering a snapshot discussion of concepts such as reference points, loss aversion, probability weighting, present bias, and social visibility, among others, and of what they may have to do with the coronavirus era. The second and central part of the lecture is dedicated to expectations. My main message is that expectations, beliefs, confidence, sentiments, fears—all these things that we discuss with our psychologists as we lie on the couch—are objects that have lives of their own. They may even be something we can choose—consciously or not—rather than being merely a passive, mechanical implication of our environment and actions. The seemingly simple link from information to beliefs and expectations is neither self-evident nor, for the time being, well understood. I will also offer a taste of current research on the topic, and conclude with a word for Israel’s policymakers about transparency and communication with the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Ori Heffetz, 2020. "Beliefs, Expectations, And Behavior In The Time Of Corona," Israel Economic Review, Bank of Israel, vol. 18(1), pages 47-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:boi:isrerv:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:47-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://boiwebrepec.azurefd.net/RePEc/boi/isrerv/IsER_18_2020_1_047-058.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Ted O'Donoghue & Matthew Rabin, 2015. "Present Bias: Lessons Learned and to Be Learned," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 273-279, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michelle Baddeley & Geoff Harcourt, 2021. "A Behavioural Model of Investment Appraisal and its Implications for the Macroeconomy," Working Paper Series 2021/05, Economics Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Gruener, Sven & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2025. "The relevance of behavioral patterns when dealing with human-made climate change: Results from a survey with 1,510 researchers," SocArXiv uzycj_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Robertson, Deirdre & Shier, Adam Joachim & Timmons, Shane & Lunn, Pete, 2026. "Buying and selling property in Ireland: Behavioural evidence on bidding systems, stressors and market comprehension," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS226.
    4. Elias L. Khalil, 2025. "Anxiety and rationality: Allais paradox, procrastination, Keynesian expectations, and other anxiety-based deviations from rationality," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Jeroen van der Heijden, 2020. "Urban climate governance informed by behavioural insights: A commentary and research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(9), pages 1994-2007, July.
    6. Abubakar, Jamila & Aysan, Ahmet F. & Disli, Mustafa, 2025. "(Un)risky commitments," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Herweg, Fabian & Weinschenk, Philipp, 2022. "Multi-attribute heuristics and intertemporal choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 174-181.
    8. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    9. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    10. Philippe Fevrier & Sebastien Gay, 2005. "Informed Consent Versus Presumed Consent The Role of the Family in Organ Donations," HEW 0509007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Shuang Yao & Donghua Yu & Yan Song & Hao Yao & Yuzhen Hu & Benhai Guo, 2018. "Dry Bulk Carrier Investment Selection through a Dual Group Decision Fusing Mechanism in the Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    13. Pieter Nel & Renee van Eyden, 2026. "From News to Noise: Does Media Sentiment Drive Stock Market Volatility?," Working Papers 202605, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    14. Christoph Engel & Michael Kurschilgen, 2011. "Fairness Ex Ante and Ex Post: Experimentally Testing Ex Post Judicial Intervention into Blockbuster Deals," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 682-708, December.
    15. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    16. Singal, Vijay & Xu, Zhaojin, 2011. "Selling winners, holding losers: Effect on fund flows and survival of disposition-prone mutual funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2704-2718, October.
    17. Jos'e Cl'audio do Nascimento, 2019. "Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation," Papers 1908.01709, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    18. Alex Cukierman & Anton Muscatelli, 2001. "Do Central Banks have Precautionary Demands for Expansions and for Price Stability?," Working Papers 2002_4, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow, revised Mar 2002.
    19. Dash, Saumya Ranjan & Maitra, Debasish, 2018. "Does sentiment matter for stock returns? Evidence from Indian stock market using wavelet approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 32-39.
    20. José F. Tudón M., 2019. "Perception, utility, and evolution," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 7(2), pages 191-208, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boi:isrerv:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:47-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yossi Yakhin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boigvil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.