IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v40y2023i4p617-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical systems practice 4: Check—Evaluating and reflecting on a multimethodological intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Michael C. Jackson

Abstract

This is the fourth of a series of papers on the stages of critical systems practice. Critical systems practice is a multimethodology that seeks to employ the ideas of critical systems thinking to intervene in and improve complex real‐world ‘messes’. It has four stages—Explore (the problem situation), Produce (an intervention strategy), Intervene (flexibly), and Check (on progress)—called to mind as EPIC. The aim is to set out where thinking has reached on the best way to carry out each of these stages and to invite comment on what more needs doing. This paper discusses the fourth stage, Check. During Check, decision makers, and other stakeholders, evaluate the intervention, reflect on what has happened with a view to improving future interventions, and discuss next steps.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael C. Jackson, 2023. "Critical systems practice 4: Check—Evaluating and reflecting on a multimethodological intervention," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 617-632, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:4:p:617-632
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2912
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:4:p:617-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.