IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i6p2849-2862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strength in numbers: The forces of constituency size, legislator identity, and institutional position on veterans’ representation

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsey Cormack

Abstract

Objective Veterans are overrepresented in Congress, yet few studies focus on how veteran‐related outcomes are related to the veteran status of individual legislators and the size of veterans within a district. Methods Using a novel data set spanning from 2005 to 2017, I assess three measures of substantive representation: placement on a relevant committee, legislative effort, and communication efforts. Results Veterans in Congress are not more likely to get a seat on the Veterans Affairs Committee than non‐veterans, but the share of veterans in a constituency is related to committee placement. Though veterans tend to introduce more bills and talk about veterans’ issues more often, the share of veterans within a constituency is also positively related to efforts focused on veterans. Conclusion Veterans in Congress and size of veterans’ constituencies impact different features of representational politics. Legislators from areas with greater shares of veterans, regardless of their own veteran status tend to get sets on the Veteran Affairs Committee, introduce more veterans’ legislation, and talk about veterans in communications.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsey Cormack, 2021. "Strength in numbers: The forces of constituency size, legislator identity, and institutional position on veterans’ representation," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2849-2862, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:6:p:2849-2862
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13097
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coughlin, Cletus C, 1985. "Domestic Content Legislation: House Voting and the Economic Theory of Regulation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(3), pages 437-448, July.
    2. Peltzman, Sam, 1984. "Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 27(1), pages 181-210, April.
    3. Stacy G. Ulbig, 2007. "Gendering Municipal Government: Female Descriptive Representation and Feelings of Political Trust," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1106-1123, December.
    4. Masters, Nicholas A., 1961. "Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(2), pages 345-357, June.
    5. William Curtis Ellis & Walter Clark Wilson, 2013. "Minority Chairs and Congressional Attention to Minority Issues: The Effect of Descriptive Representation in Positions of Institutional Power," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1207-1221, December.
    6. Adrian D. Pantoja & Gary M. Segura, 2003. "Does Ethnicity Matter? Descriptive Representation in Legislatures and Political Alienation Among Latinos," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(2), pages 441-460, June.
    7. Kenneth Lowande & Melinda Ritchie & Erinn Lauterbach, 2019. "Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(3), pages 644-659, July.
    8. Kathleen A. Bratton, 2006. "The Behavior and Success of Latino Legislators: Evidence from the States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1136-1157, December.
    9. Kathleen A. Bratton, 2006. "The Behavior and Success of Latino Legislators: Evidence from the States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 87(s1), pages 1136-1157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin R. Knoll, 2009. "¿Amigo de la Raza? Reexamining Determinants of Latino Support in the U.S. Congress," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(1), pages 179-195, March.
    2. Ansolabehere, Stephen & De Figueiredo, John M. & Snyder, James M., 2003. "Are Campaign Contributions Investment in the Political Marketplace or Individual Consumption? Or "Why Is There So Little Money in Politics?"," Working papers 4272-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. Dana L. Hoag & Thomas G. Field, 1999. "Political and Economic Factors Affecting Agricultural PAC Contribution Strategies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(2), pages 397-407.
    4. Denise Laroze & David Hugh-Jones & Arndt Leininger, 2015. "The impact of group identity on coalition formation," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2015-03, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    5. Potters, Jan & Sloof, Randolph, 1996. "Interest groups: A survey of empirical models that try to assess their influence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 403-442, November.
    6. Boadu, Frederick O. & Thompson, Marla R., 1993. "The Political Economy Of The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement: Analysis Of The Congressional Fast Track Vote," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Stephen Ansolabehere & John M. de Figueiredo & James M. Snyder Jr, 2003. "Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 105-130, Winter.
    8. Michelle L. Frisco & Jason N. Houle & Molly A. Martin, 2009. "Adolescent Weight and Depressive Symptoms: For Whom is Weight a Burden?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(4), pages 1019-1038, December.
    9. Mayne, Quinton & Hakhverdian, Armen, 2016. "Ideological Congruence and Citizen Satisfaction: Evidence from 25 Advanced Democracies," Scholarly Articles 25302405, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    10. Walter Clark Wilson, 2010. "Descriptive Representation and Latino Interest Bill Sponsorship in Congress," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(4), pages 1043-1062, December.
    11. Landry, Joel R., 2021. "The political allocation of green pork and its implications for federal climate policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    12. David Lowery & Virginia Gray, 2004. "Bias in the Heavenly Chorus," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 16(1), pages 5-29, January.
    13. Matthew J. Holian & Matthew E. Kahn, 2014. "Household Demand for Low Carbon Public Policies: Evidence from California," NBER Working Papers 19965, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Kroszner, Randall S., 2000. "Obstacles To Optimal Policy: The Interplay of Politics and Economics in Shaping Bank Supervision and Regulation Reforms," Working Papers 158, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    15. Andrew Chupp, B., 2011. "Environmental Constituent Interest, Green Electricity Policies, and Legislative Voting," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 254-266, September.
    16. Kris James Mitchener & Matthew Jaremski, 2014. "The Evolution of Bank Supervision: Evidence from U.S. States," NBER Working Papers 20603, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Andrew G. Sutherland & Matthias Uckert & Felix W. Vetter, 2024. "Occupational Licensing and Minority Participation in Professional Labor Markets," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 453-503, May.
    18. Poole, Keith T. & Rosenthal, Howard, 1996. "Are legislators ideologues or the agents of constituents?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 707-717, April.
    19. Richard T. Cupitt & Euel Elliott, 1994. "Schattschneider Revisited: Senate Voting On The Smoot‐Hawley Tariff Act Of 1930," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 187-199, November.
    20. Franklin G. Mixon & Rand W. Ressler, 1993. "Union Influence and Right‐to‐Work Law Passage," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 183-192, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:6:p:2849-2862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.