IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rmgtin/v1y1997i1p51-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative Efficiencies Of Non‐Life Reinsurance Marketing Methods

Author

Listed:
  • James Barrese
  • Jack M. Nelson

Abstract

This paper extends the study of the relative cost efficiency of insurance delivery systems from the primary market to the market for non‐life reinsurance services. As in the primary market for insurance services there are two predominant methods of marketing reinsurance services: reinsurers who rely on employees, termed direct writers, and those who rely on brokers. An extensive literature relating to the primary market for non‐life insurance consistently indicates that independent agency insurers have a cost disadvantage relative to exclusive agency insurers. This literature also suggests that independent agency insurers may supply superior service but a continuing erosion of the market share of independent agency insurers suggests that the perceived service differential is not valued sufficiently to offset the perceived cost differential. The authors find evidence that, cet. par., broker supplied reinsurers operate with lower costs than direct reinsurers but we find less convincing evidence of a service differential favoring direct reinsurers. More significantly, we observe that the largest component of the traditional measure of the reinsurer's cost is the commission paid back to the primary insurer: the seemingly lower cost brokers provide a higher net cost product. Yet brokers thrive in the marketplace suggesting the existence of a product differentiated by service or quality. With the important caveat that measures of service are imperfect and data is limited, we find no evidence of a service differential.

Suggested Citation

  • James Barrese & Jack M. Nelson, 1997. "Relative Efficiencies Of Non‐Life Reinsurance Marketing Methods," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 1(1), pages 51-64, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:1:y:1997:i:1:p:51-64
    DOI: j.1540-6296.1997.tb00063.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.1997.tb00063.x
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:1:y:1997:i:1:p:51-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley Content Delivery). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1098-1616 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.