IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jrinsu/v87y2020i2p501-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ruin Probabilities And Capital Requirement for Open Automobile Portfolios With a Bonus‐Malus System Based on Claim Counts

Author

Listed:
  • Lourdes B. Afonso
  • Rui M. R. Cardoso
  • Alfredo D. Egídio dos Reis
  • Gracinda R. Guerreiro

Abstract

For a large motor insurance portfolio, on an open environment, we study the impact of experience rating in finite and continuous time ruin probabilities. We consider a model for calculating ruin probabilities applicable to large portfolios with a Markovian Bonus‐Malus System (BMS), based on claim counts, for an automobile portfolio using the classical risk framework model. New challenges are brought when an open portfolio scenario is introduced. When compared with a classical BMS approach ruin probabilities may change significantly. By using a BMS of a Portuguese insurer, we illustrate and discuss the impact of the proposed formulation on the initial surplus required to target a given ruin probability. Under an open portfolio setup, we show that we may have a significant impact on capital requirements when compared with the classical BMS, by having a significant reduction on the initial surplus needed to maintain a fixed level of the ruin probability.

Suggested Citation

  • Lourdes B. Afonso & Rui M. R. Cardoso & Alfredo D. Egídio dos Reis & Gracinda R. Guerreiro, 2020. "Ruin Probabilities And Capital Requirement for Open Automobile Portfolios With a Bonus‐Malus System Based on Claim Counts," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 87(2), pages 501-522, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:87:y:2020:i:2:p:501-522
    DOI: 10.1111/jori.12300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12300
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jori.12300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Afonso, Lourdes B. & Cardoso, Rui M. R. & Egídio dos Reis, Alfredo D. & Guerreiro, Gracinda Rita, 2017. "Measuring The Impact Of A Bonus-Malus System In Finite And Continuous Time Ruin Probabilities For Large Portfolios In Motor Insurance," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 417-435, May.
    2. Afonso, Lourdes B. & dos Reis, Alfredo D. Egídio & Waters, Howard R., 2009. "Calculating Continuous Time Ruin Probabilities for a Large Portfolio with Varying Premiums," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 117-136, May.
    3. de Lourdes Centeno, Maria & Manuel Andrade e Silva, Joao, 2001. "Bonus systems in an open portfolio," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 341-350, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dhiti Osatakul & Xueyuan Wu, 2021. "Discrete-Time Risk Models with Claim Correlated Premiums in a Markovian Environment," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Osatakul, Dhiti & Li, Shuanming & Wu, Xueyuan, 2023. "Discrete-time risk models with surplus-dependent premium corrections," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    3. Manuel L. Esquível & Nadezhda P. Krasii & Gracinda R. Guerreiro, 2021. "Open Markov Type Population Models: From Discrete to Continuous Time," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-29, June.
    4. M. Mercè Claramunt & Maite Mármol & Xavier Varea, 2023. "Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility Function," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dhiti Osatakul & Xueyuan Wu, 2021. "Discrete-Time Risk Models with Claim Correlated Premiums in a Markovian Environment," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Osatakul, Dhiti & Li, Shuanming & Wu, Xueyuan, 2023. "Discrete-time risk models with surplus-dependent premium corrections," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    3. Corina Constantinescu & Suhang Dai & Weihong Ni & Zbigniew Palmowski, 2016. "Ruin Probabilities with Dependence on the Number of Claims within a Fixed Time Window," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Li, Shu & Landriault, David & Lemieux, Christiane, 2015. "A risk model with varying premiums: Its risk management implications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 38-46.
    5. Jorge Wilson Euphasio Junior & João Vinícius França Carvalho, 2022. "Resseguro e Capital de Solvência: Atenuantes da Probabilidade de Ruína de SeguradorasReinsurance and Solvency Capital: Mitigating Insurance Companies’ Ruin Probability," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(1), pages 200191-2001.
    6. Azaare Jacob & Zhao Wu, 2020. "An Alternative Pricing System through Bayesian Estimates and Method of Moments in a Bonus-Malus Framework for the Ghanaian Auto Insurance Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Natacha Brouhns & Montserrat Guillén & Michel Denuit & Jean Pinquet, 2003. "Bonus‐Malus Scales in Segmented Tariffs With Stochastic Migration Between Segments," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 70(4), pages 577-599, December.
    8. Mahmoudvand Rahim & Tan Chong It & Abbasi Narges, 2017. "Adjusting the Premium Relativities in a Bonus-Malus System: An Integrated Approach Using the First Claim Time and the Number of Claims," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:87:y:2020:i:2:p:501-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ariaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.