IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v13y2020i7p143-d380011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative Pricing System through Bayesian Estimates and Method of Moments in a Bonus-Malus Framework for the Ghanaian Auto Insurance Market

Author

Listed:
  • Azaare Jacob

    (School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 2006, Xiyuan Ave, West High- Tech Zone, Chengdu 611731, China)

  • Zhao Wu

    (School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 2006, Xiyuan Ave, West High- Tech Zone, Chengdu 611731, China)

Abstract

This paper examines the current No-Claim Discount (NCD) system used in Ghana’s auto insurance market as inefficient and outmoded and, therefore, proposes an alternative optimal Bonus-Malus System (BMS) intended to meet the present market conditions and demand. It appears that the existing BMS fails to acknowledge the frequency and severity of policyholders’ claims in its design. We minimized the auto insurance portfolios’ risk through Bayesian estimation and found that the risk is well fitted by gamma, with the claim distribution modeled by the negative binomial law with the expected number of claims (a priori) as 14%. The models presented in this paper recognize the longevity of accident-free driving and fully reward higher discounts to policyholders from the second year when the true characteristics of the hidden risks posed to the pool have been ascertained. The BMS finally constructed using the net premium principle is very optimal and has reasonable punishment and rewards for both good and bad drivers, which could also be useful in other developing economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Azaare Jacob & Zhao Wu, 2020. "An Alternative Pricing System through Bayesian Estimates and Method of Moments in a Bonus-Malus Framework for the Ghanaian Auto Insurance Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:143-:d:380011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/7/143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/7/143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georges Dionne & Olfa Ghali, 2005. "The (1992) Bonus‐Malus System in Tunisia: An Empirical Evaluation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 609-633, December.
    2. Freeland, R. K. & McCabe, B. P. M., 2004. "Forecasting discrete valued low count time series," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 427-434.
    3. Gomez, E. & Hernandez, A. & Perez, J. M. & Vazquez-Polo, F. J., 2002. "Measuring sensitivity in a bonus-malus system," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 105-113, August.
    4. Gourieroux, C. & Jasiak, J., 2004. "Heterogeneous INAR(1) model with application to car insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 177-192, April.
    5. Walhin, J.F. & Paris, J., 2001. "The Practical Replacement of a Bonus-Malus System," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 317-335, November.
    6. Jean-Philippe Boucher & Michel Denuit & Montserrat Guillén, 2007. "Risk Classification for Claim Counts," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 110-131.
    7. Silvie Kafková & Lenka Křivánková, 2014. "Generalized Linear Models in Vehicle Insurance," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(2), pages 383-388.
    8. Pitrebois, Sandra & Walhin, Jean-François & Denuit, Michel, 2005. "Bonus-malus Systems with Varying Deductibles," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 261-274, May.
    9. Renshaw, Arthur E., 1994. "Modelling the Claims Process in the Presence of Covariates," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 265-285, November.
    10. Natacha Brouhns & Montserrat Guillén & Michel Denuit & Jean Pinquet, 2003. "Bonus‐Malus Scales in Segmented Tariffs With Stochastic Migration Between Segments," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 70(4), pages 577-599, December.
    11. Sarabia, José María & Gómez-Déniz, Emilio & Vázquez-Polo, Francisco J., 2004. "On the Use of Conditional Specification Models in Claim Count Distributions: an Application to Bonus-Malus Systems," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 85-98, May.
    12. Frangos, Nicholas E. & Vrontos, Spyridon D., 2001. "Design of Optimal Bonus-Malus Systems With a Frequency and a Severity Component On an Individual Basis in Automobile Insurance," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 1-22, May.
    13. de Lourdes Centeno, Maria & Manuel Andrade e Silva, Joao, 2001. "Bonus systems in an open portfolio," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 341-350, June.
    14. Serpil Bülbül & Kemal Baykal, 2016. "Optimal Bonus-Malus System Design in Motor Third-Party Liability Insurance in Turkey: Negative Binomial Model," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(8), pages 205-205, August.
    15. Berg, Andreas & Meyer, Renate & Yu, Jun, 2004. "Deviance Information Criterion for Comparing Stochastic Volatility Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 107-120, January.
    16. Tremblay, Luc, 1992. "Using the Poisson Inverse Gaussian in Bonus-Malus Systems," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 97-106, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacob Azaare & Zhao Wu & Bright Nana Kwame Ahia, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Classical Auto Insurance Rating Variables on Premium in ARDL: Is the high Policyholders’ Premium in Ghana Justified?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob Azaare & Zhao Wu & Bright Nana Kwame Ahia, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Classical Auto Insurance Rating Variables on Premium in ARDL: Is the high Policyholders’ Premium in Ghana Justified?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    2. Yang Lu, 2018. "Dynamic Frailty Count Process in Insurance: A Unified Framework for Estimation, Pricing, and Forecasting," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 85(4), pages 1083-1102, December.
    3. Olena Ragulina, 2017. "Bonus--malus systems with different claim types and varying deductibles," Papers 1707.00917, arXiv.org.
    4. Mahmoudvand Rahim & Tan Chong It & Abbasi Narges, 2017. "Adjusting the Premium Relativities in a Bonus-Malus System: An Integrated Approach Using the First Claim Time and the Number of Claims," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Tzougas, George & Hoon, W. L. & Lim, J. M., 2019. "The negative binomial-inverse Gaussian regression model with an application to insurance ratemaking," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Tan, Chong It, 2016. "Varying transition rules in bonus–malus systems: From rules specification to determination of optimal relativities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 134-140.
    7. George Tzougas, 2020. "EM Estimation for the Poisson-Inverse Gamma Regression Model with Varying Dispersion: An Application to Insurance Ratemaking," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Enrique Calderín-Ojeda, 2018. "Multivariate Credibility in Bonus-Malus Systems Distinguishing between Different Types of Claims," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, April.
    9. Tzougas, George, 2020. "EM estimation for the Poisson-Inverse Gamma regression model with varying dispersion: an application to insurance ratemaking," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Tzougas, George & Pignatelli di Cerchiara, Alice, 2021. "The multivariate mixed Negative Binomial regression model with an application to insurance a posteriori ratemaking," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 602-625.
    11. Tan, Chong It & Li, Jackie & Li, Johnny Siu-Hang & Balasooriya, Uditha, 2015. "Optimal relativities and transition rules of a bonus–malus system," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 255-263.
    12. Tzougas, George & Karlis, Dimitris & Frangos, Nicholas, 2017. "Confidence intervals of the premiums of optimal Bonus Malus Systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 70926, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Serpil Bülbül & Kemal Baykal, 2016. "Optimal Bonus-Malus System Design in Motor Third-Party Liability Insurance in Turkey: Negative Binomial Model," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(8), pages 205-205, August.
    14. Payandeh Najafabadi Amir T. & MohammadPour Saeed, 2018. "A k-Inflated Negative Binomial Mixture Regression Model: Application to Rate–Making Systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31, July.
    15. Aknouche, Abdelhakim & Dimitrakopoulos, Stefanos, 2020. "On an integer-valued stochastic intensity model for time series of counts," MPRA Paper 105406, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Lluís Bermúdez & Dimitris Karlis & Isabel Morillo, 2020. "Modelling Unobserved Heterogeneity in Claim Counts Using Finite Mixture Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Youn Ahn, Jae & Jeong, Himchan & Lu, Yang, 2021. "On the ordering of credibility factors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 626-638.
    18. Park, Sojung C. & Kim, Joseph H.T. & Ahn, Jae Youn, 2018. "Does hunger for bonuses drive the dependence between claim frequency and severity?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 32-46.
    19. Bermúdez, Lluís & Karlis, Dimitris, 2012. "A finite mixture of bivariate Poisson regression models with an application to insurance ratemaking," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3988-3999.
    20. Tzougas, George & Vrontos, Spyridon & Frangos, Nicholas, 2014. "Optimal Bonus-Malus Systems using finite mixture models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 70919, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:143-:d:380011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.