IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Population-based reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian variable selection and evaluation under cost limit restrictions

Listed author(s):
  • D. Fouskakis
  • I. Ntzoufras
  • D. Draper
Registered author(s):

    The measurement and improvement of the quality of health care are important areas of current research and development. A judgement of appropriateness of medical outcomes in hospital quality-of-care studies must depend on an assessment of patient sickness at admission to hospital. Indicators of patient sickness often must be abstracted from medical records, and some variables are more expensive to measure than others. Quality-of-care studies are frequently undertaken in an environment of cost restriction; thus any scale measuring patient sickness must simultaneously respect two optimality criteria: high predictive accuracy and low cost. Here we examine a variable selection strategy for construction of a scale of sickness in which predictive accuracy is optimized subject to a bound on cost. Conventional model search algorithms (such as those based on standard reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) sampling) in our setting will often fail, because of the existence of multiple modes of the criterion function with movement paths that are forbidden because of the cost restriction. We develop a population-based trans-dimensional RJMCMC (population RJMCMC) algorithm, in which ideas from the population-based MCMC and simulated tempering algorithms are combined. Comparing our method with standard RJMCMC sampling, we find that the population-based RJMCMC algorithm moves successfully and more efficiently between distant neighbourhoods of 'good' models, achieves convergence faster and has smaller Monte Carlo standard errors for a given amount of central processor unit time. In a case-study of "n"=2532 pneumonia patients on whom "p"=83 sickness indicators were measured, with marginal costs varying from smallest to largest across the predictor variables by a factor of 20, the final model chosen by population RJMCMC sampling, on the basis of both highest posterior probability and specifying the median probability model, was clinically sensible for pneumonia patients and achieved good predictive ability while capping data collection costs. Copyright (c) 2009 Royal Statistical Society.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Royal Statistical Society in its journal Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics).

    Volume (Year): 58 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 383-403

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:58:y:2009:i:3:p:383-403
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    12 Errol Street, London EC1Y 8LX, United Kingdom

    Phone: -44-171-638-8998
    Fax: -44-171-256-7598
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:58:y:2009:i:3:p:383-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.