IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v72y2010i5p609-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-parametric tests for right-censored data with biased sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Ning
  • Jing Qin
  • Yu Shen

Abstract

Testing the equality of two survival distributions can be difficult in a prevalent cohort study when non-random sampling of subjects is involved. Owing to the biased sampling scheme, the independent censoring assumption is often violated. Although the issues about biased inference caused by length-biased sampling have been widely recognized in the statistical, epidemiological and economical literature, there is no satisfactory solution for efficient two-sample testing. We propose an asymptotic most efficient non-parametric test by properly adjusting for length-biased sampling. The test statistic is derived from a full likelihood function and can be generalized from the two-sample test to a "k"-sample test. The asymptotic properties of the test statistic under the null hypothesis are derived by using its asymptotic independent and identically distributed representation. We conduct extensive Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the performance of the test statistics proposed and compare them with the conditional test and the standard log-rank test for various biased sampling schemes and right-censoring mechanisms. For length-biased data, empirical studies demonstrated that the test proposed is substantially more powerful than the existing methods. For general left-truncated data, the test proposed is robust, still maintains accurate control of the type I error rate and is also more powerful than the existing methods, if the truncation patterns and right censoring patterns are the same between the groups. We illustrate the methods by using two real data examples. Copyright (c) 2010 Royal Statistical Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Ning & Jing Qin & Yu Shen, 2010. "Non-parametric tests for right-censored data with biased sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(5), pages 609-630.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:72:y:2010:i:5:p:609-630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00742.x
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiguang Song & John M. Karon & Edward White & Gary Goldbaum, 2006. "Estimating the Distribution of a Renewal Process from Times at which Events from an Independent Process Are Detected," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 838-846, September.
    2. Bergeron, Pierre-Jerome & Asgharian, Masoud & Wolfson, David B., 2008. "Covariate Bias Induced by Length-Biased Sampling of Failure Times," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 737-742, June.
    3. Lancaster, Tony, 1979. "Econometric Methods for the Duration of Unemployment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 939-956, July.
    4. Peter McCullagh, 2008. "Sampling bias and logistic models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 643-677.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Shen & Jing Ning & Jing Qin, 2017. "Nonparametric and semiparametric regression estimation for length-biased survival data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 3-24, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:72:y:2010:i:5:p:609-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.