IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Sampling bias and logistic models

Listed author(s):
  • Peter McCullagh
Registered author(s):

    In a regression model, the joint distribution for each finite sample of units is determined by a function "p" x ( y ) depending only on the list of covariate values x =("x"("u" 1 ),…,"x"("u" "n" )) on the sampled units. No random sampling of units is involved. In biological work, random sampling is frequently unavoidable, in which case the joint distribution "p"( y,x ) depends on the sampling scheme. Regression models can be used for the study of dependence provided that the conditional distribution "p"( y | x ) for random samples agrees with "p" x ( y ) as determined by the regression model for a fixed sample having a non-random configuration x . The paper develops a model that avoids the concept of a fixed population of units, thereby forcing the sampling plan to be incorporated into the sampling distribution. For a quota sample having a predetermined covariate configuration x , the sampling distribution agrees with the standard logistic regression model with correlated components. For most natural sampling plans such as sequential or simple random sampling, the conditional distribution "p"( y | x ) is not the same as the regression distribution unless "p" x ( y ) has independent components. In this sense, most natural sampling schemes involving binary random-effects models are biased. The implications of this formulation for subject-specific and population-averaged procedures are explored. Copyright (c) 2008 Royal Statistical Society.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Royal Statistical Society in its journal Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology).

    Volume (Year): 70 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 643-677

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:70:y:2008:i:4:p:643-677
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    12 Errol Street, London EC1Y 8LX, United Kingdom

    Phone: -44-171-638-8998
    Fax: -44-171-256-7598
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:70:y:2008:i:4:p:643-677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.