IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v183y2020i4p1727-1745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discovering causal structures in Bayesian Gaussian directed acyclic graph models

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Castelletti
  • Guido Consonni

Abstract

Causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are naturally tailored to represent biological signalling pathways. However, a causal DAG is only identifiable up to Markov equivalence if only observational data are available. Interventional data, based on exogenous perturbations of the system, can greatly improve identifiability. Since the gain of an intervention crucially depends on the intervened variables, a natural issue is devising efficient strategies for optimal causal discovery. We present a Bayesian active learning procedure for Gaussian DAGs which requires no subjective specification on the side of the user, explicitly takes into account the uncertainty on the space of equivalence classes (through the posterior distribution) and sequentially proposes the choice of the optimal intervention variable. In simulation experiments our method, besides surpassing designs based on a random choice of intervention nodes, shows decisive improvements over currently available algorithms and is competitive with the best alternative benchmarks. An important reason behind this strong performance is that, unlike non‐Bayesian algorithms, our utility function naturally incorporates graph estimation uncertainty through the posterior edge inclusion probability. We also reanalyse the Sachs data on protein signalling pathways from an active learning perspective and show that DAG identification can be achieved by using only a subset of the available intervention samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Castelletti & Guido Consonni, 2020. "Discovering causal structures in Bayesian Gaussian directed acyclic graph models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(4), pages 1727-1745, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:183:y:2020:i:4:p:1727-1745
    DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12550
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssa.12550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judea Pearl, 2003. "Statistics and causal inference: A review," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(2), pages 281-345, December.
    2. Jonas Peters & Peter Bühlmann & Nicolai Meinshausen, 2016. "Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(5), pages 947-1012, November.
    3. Alain Hauser & Peter Bühlmann, 2015. "Jointly interventional and observational data: estimation of interventional Markov equivalence classes of directed acyclic graphs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 77(1), pages 291-318, January.
    4. J. Peters & P. Bühlmann, 2014. "Identifiability of Gaussian structural equation models with equal error variances," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(1), pages 219-228.
    5. Christine Peterson & Francesco C. Stingo & Marina Vannucci, 2015. "Bayesian Inference of Multiple Gaussian Graphical Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 159-174, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Federico Castelletti & Guido Consonni & Luca Rocca, 2022. "Discussion to: Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications by Y. Ni, V. Baladandayuthapani, M. Vannucci and F.C. Stingo," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(2), pages 261-267, June.
    2. Guilin Zhang & Fei Xie & Dan Wang, 2024. "Reliability assessment method for tank bottom plates based on hierarchical Bayesian corrosion growth model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(1), pages 112-121, February.
    3. Federico Castelletti, 2020. "Bayesian Model Selection of Gaussian Directed Acyclic Graph Structures," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 752-775, December.
    4. Federico Castelletti & Alessandro Mascaro, 2021. "Structural learning and estimation of joint causal effects among network-dependent variables," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(5), pages 1289-1314, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federico Castelletti & Guido Consonni, 2021. "Bayesian inference of causal effects from observational data in Gaussian graphical models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 136-149, March.
    2. Castelletti, Federico & Peluso, Stefano, 2021. "Equivalence class selection of categorical graphical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Fangting Zhou & Kejun He & Yang Ni, 2023. "Individualized causal discovery with latent trajectory embedded Bayesian networks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3191-3202, December.
    4. Wang, Bingling & Zhou, Qing, 2021. "Causal network learning with non-invertible functional relationships," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Nikolaos Petrakis & Stefano Peluso & Dimitris Fouskakis & Guido Consonni, 2020. "Objective methods for graphical structural learning," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 420-438, August.
    6. Christian Gische & Manuel C. Voelkle, 2022. "Beyond the Mean: A Flexible Framework for Studying Causal Effects Using Linear Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 868-901, September.
    7. Huang, Xianzheng & Zhang, Hongmei, 2021. "Tests for differential Gaussian Bayesian networks based on quadratic inference functions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Jonas Peters & Peter Bühlmann & Nicolai Meinshausen, 2016. "Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(5), pages 947-1012, November.
    9. Federico Castelletti, 2020. "Bayesian Model Selection of Gaussian Directed Acyclic Graph Structures," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 752-775, December.
    10. Ruoxuan Xiong & Allison Koenecke & Michael Powell & Zhu Shen & Joshua T. Vogelstein & Susan Athey, 2021. "Federated Causal Inference in Heterogeneous Observational Data," Papers 2107.11732, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    11. Paci, Lucia & Consonni, Guido, 2020. "Structural learning of contemporaneous dependencies in graphical VAR models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Mehran Aflakparast & Mathisca de Gunst & Wessel van Wieringen, 2020. "Analysis of Twitter data with the Bayesian fused graphical lasso," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    13. Wessel N. van Wieringen & Carel F. W. Peeters & Renee X. de Menezes & Mark A. van de Wiel, 2018. "Testing for pathway (in)activation by using Gaussian graphical models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1419-1436, November.
    14. Anindya Bhadra, 2022. "Discussion to: Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications by Y. Ni, V. Baladandayuthapani, M. Vannucci and F.C. Stingo," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(2), pages 235-239, June.
    15. van Wieringen, Wessel N. & Stam, Koen A. & Peeters, Carel F.W. & van de Wiel, Mark A., 2020. "Updating of the Gaussian graphical model through targeted penalized estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    16. Abrell, Jan & Kosch, Mirjam & Rausch, Sebastian, 2022. "How effective is carbon pricing?—A machine learning approach to policy evaluation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    17. Andrew B. Martinez, 2020. "Forecast Accuracy Matters for Hurricane Damage," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Hang Su & Wei Wang, 2023. "An Out-of-Distribution Generalization Framework Based on Variational Backdoor Adjustment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Peter Bühlmann & Domagoj Ćevid, 2020. "Deconfounding and Causal Regularisation for Stability and External Validity," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(S1), pages 114-134, December.
    20. Fazia Abdat & Sylvie Leclercq & Xavier Cuny & Claire Tissot, 2014. "Extracting recurrent scenarios from narrative texts using a Bayesian network: Application to serious occupational accidents with movement disturbance," Post-Print hal-01578382, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:183:y:2020:i:4:p:1727-1745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.