IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v169y2006i3p507-523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of a long‐term study of neurotic disorder, with insights into the process of non‐response

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas T. Longford
  • P. Tyrer
  • U. A. M. Nur
  • H. Seivewright

Abstract

Summary. The paper studies the non‐response process in a long‐term study of neurotic dis‐order by comparing the analysis based on the responses that were collected by the established practice of interviewing the subjects, at dates arranged in advance (appointments), with the analysis of the nearly complete set of responses that were collected by an extensive effort that involved attempts to interview without seeking a prior agreement. The method of multiple imputation is applied, and its properties are explored in a setting that is not perfectly suited for its application: a relatively small sample size, ordinal score outcomes and the likelihood that the outcomes are missing not at random.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas T. Longford & P. Tyrer & U. A. M. Nur & H. Seivewright, 2006. "Analysis of a long‐term study of neurotic disorder, with insights into the process of non‐response," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(3), pages 507-523, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:169:y:2006:i:3:p:507-523
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00406.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00406.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00406.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2002. "Principal Stratification in Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 21-29, March.
    2. Nicholas T. Longford & Margaret Ely & Rebecca Hardy & Michael E. J. Wadsworth, 2000. "Handling missing data in diaries of alcohol consumption," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 163(3), pages 381-402.
    3. Nicholas T. Longford, 2004. "Missing data and small area estimation in the UK Labour Force Survey," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(2), pages 341-373, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael R. Elliott & Anna Conlon & Yun Li, 2013. "Discussion on “Surrogate Measures and Consistent Surrogates”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 565-569, September.
    2. Ying Huang & Shibasish Dasgupta, 2019. "Likelihood-Based Methods for Assessing Principal Surrogate Endpoints in Vaccine Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(3), pages 504-523, December.
    3. John Engberg & Dennis Epple & Jason Imbrogno & Holger Sieg & Ron Zimmer, 2014. "Evaluating Education Programs That Have Lotteried Admission and Selective Attrition," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 27-63.
    4. Cristina Barceló, 2008. "The impact of alternative imputation methods on the measurement of income and wealth: Evidence from the Spanish survey of household finances," Working Papers 0829, Banco de España.
    5. Rachel Axelrod & Daniel Nevo, 2023. "A sensitivity analysis approach for the causal hazard ratio in randomized and observational studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2743-2756, September.
    6. Dean Follmann, 2006. "Augmented Designs to Assess Immune Response in Vaccine Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1161-1169, December.
    7. G. Baker Stuart & S. Lindeman Karen, 2013. "Revisiting a Discrepant Result: A Propensity Score Analysis, the Paired Availability Design for Historical Controls, and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 51-82, June.
    8. Bubb, Ryan & Kaufman, Alex, 2014. "Securitization and moral hazard: Evidence from credit score cutoff rules," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-18.
    9. Eduardo Fé, 2021. "Pension eligibility rules and the local causal effect of retirement on cognitive functioning," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 812-841, July.
    10. Peter B. Gilbert & Ronald J. Bosch & Michael G. Hudgens, 2003. "Sensitivity Analysis for the Assessment of Causal Vaccine Effects on Viral Load in HIV Vaccine Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 531-541, September.
    11. German Blanco & Carlos A. Flores & Alfonso Flores-Lagunes, 2013. "Bounds on Average and Quantile Treatment Effects of Job Corps Training on Wages," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 48(3), pages 659-701.
    12. Michael Rosenblum & Nicholas P. Jewell & Mark van der Laan & Stephen Shiboski & Ariane van der Straten & Nancy Padian, 2009. "Analysing direct effects in randomized trials with secondary interventions: an application to human immunodeficiency virus prevention trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(2), pages 443-465, April.
    13. Jierui Du & Gao Wen & Xin Liang, 2024. "Estimating the Complier Average Causal Effect with Non-Ignorable Missing Outcomes Using Likelihood Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Jan Pablo Burgard & Domingo Morales & Anna-Lena Wölwer, 2022. "Small area estimation of socioeconomic indicators for sampled and unsampled domains," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(2), pages 287-314, June.
    15. Shuxi Zeng & Fan Li & Peng Ding, 2020. "Is being an only child harmful to psychological health?: Evidence from an instrumental variable analysis of China's One-Child Policy," Papers 2005.09130, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    16. Choi, Byeong Yeob & Lee, Jae Won, 2019. "The isotonic regression approach for an instrumental variable estimation of the potential outcome distributions for compliers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 134-144.
    17. Jincheng Zhou & James S. Hodges & Haitao Chu, 2020. "Rejoinder to “CACE and meta‐analysis (letter to the editor)” by Stuart Baker," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1385-1389, December.
    18. Benedikt Koch & Kosuke Imai, 2025. "Statistical Decision Theory with Counterfactual Loss," Papers 2505.08908, arXiv.org.
    19. Soojin Park & Gregory J. Palardy, 2020. "Sensitivity Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Complier Average Causal Mediation Effects to Assumptions," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(4), pages 475-506, August.
    20. Laura Forastiere & Patrizia Lattarulo & Marco Mariani & Fabrizia Mealli & Laura Razzolini, 2021. "Exploring Encouragement, Treatment, and Spillover Effects Using Principal Stratification, With Application to a Field Experiment on Teens’ Museum Attendance," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 244-258, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:169:y:2006:i:3:p:507-523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.